KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - EMI Slep Tone Sound Choice case status?? Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Thu Jan 09, 2025 10:22 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 188 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 7:07 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am
Posts: 3312
Images: 0
Been Liked: 610 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
when KJs were dumb enough to run shows on their PC's...


Yes. KJ's using PC's are the dumb ones.

Only in:

Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 11:29 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
cueball wrote:
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
Back in the beginning, when KJs were dumb enough to run shows on their PCs...
wow, suddenly i'm to blame for the collapse of some manus?
Don't forget... Joe just called all KJs who run their shows on a PC dumb too.

No, I didn't. You are either stirring the pot or have comprehension problems. Either should be corrected.

That is NOT what I said, so you PC users can sheath your claws...

I SAID that those who were FIRST to do so are responsible for the quick market saturation of home PC users turned "KJs". Those who use PCs NOW are simply using familiar tools that are now a natural part of the industry.

However, two things remain inarguable facts:

1) While MP3s existed for quite awhile prior, karaoke piracy EXPLODED after producers ( and illegal distributors) ripped the tracks and put them online, where they could be obtained (hacked) for free without any special drives, physical media (discs) to buy, labels to worry about, bought and printed, and all the other time and expenses associated with disc pirates..

That HAPPENED. No if, ands, or buts.

2) As stated above, the market became saturated when folks at home (especially as the economy began to crash) realized that they could attempt to make an income using products that they already owned to cover what would have been the most expensive part of a KJ's business.
That HAPPENED. No if, ands, or buts.

Argue all you want, but those two things won't change. Therefore, not all responsibility for today's situation rests 100% on pirates. A lot of foot shooting was involved. Now, things are what they are, yes - the explosion in piracy is about to make major industry- wide changes in music sourcing, availability, business costs, and other things. However, that explosion didn't happen without help.

Also, the speedy onset of sourcing problems would have come with more notice and time to adjust if it were not for SC having trodon the publishers/owners toes, as well as making a frivolous, litigous cacaphony loud enough to awaken the giants - all of which was easiliy predicted by anyone with common sense. Thank you SC.
Btw- for Paradigm: I switched from cassettes for the higher quality laser discs, then switched to more economical, more compact, yet equal quality CDGs. When a better quality media ( that might also be devoid of certain legal worries) comes along, I will switch again.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Last edited by JoeChartreuse on Sat Jun 07, 2014 1:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 10:57 am 
Offline
Major Poster
Major Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 12:27 pm
Posts: 96
Location: Slidell, LA
Been Liked: 2 times
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EXPRESSWAY MUSIC, INC.,Plaintiff,v.SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION,Defendant.CIVIL ACTION FILE NUMBER:1:12-CV-00834-ALC-MHD


I.INTRODUCTION Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation (“Slep-Tone”) has long been known for producing karaoke music for purchase by individuals and karaoke jockeys. More recently, Slep-Tone and its counsel have been in the business of filing baseless trademark infringement complaints. Their money-making scheme operates as follows: Slep-Tone files complaints alleging infringement of Slep-Tone’s trademarks by individuals, karaoke jockeys, and establishments such as restaurants that offer karaoke services. Each complaint substantially mirrors a prior-filed complaint as if a form complaint is maintained by Slep-Tone for its various counsel. These complaints assume that any person or entity providing karaoke services is infringing their trademarks. Periodically,they select a number of targets within a federal jurisdiction against which to file the form complaint. In some cases, before filing a complaint, Slep-Tone, via its counsel or its authorized agent, distributes form settlement letters offering to settle the lawsuit for a minimal amount. In other cases, substantially identical letters are distributed after the complaint is filed. Although the infringement claims are baseless and the illicit scheme transparent (and well documented),
1
defendants choose to settle rather than expend a much greater sum to defend the suit.Rule 11 exists precisely to discourage this sort of conduct. Slep-Tone and its counsel conduct NO investigations prior to filing their form infringement complaints. Indeed, if they had conducted the most minimal investigation in this case, they would have found that Expressway has legally purchased its karaoke tracks and does not maintain a single counterfeit track, barring any possibility of success on the merits. Slep-Tone and its counsel should not be permitted touse the legal system to extort settlement fees based on mere guesses as to who could be infringing a particular trademark. Rule 11 sanctions should be imposed.

_________________
If you don't have anything nice to say, say it sarcastically!
The Truth often gets in the way of a good story.
Record companies should make every song in a karaoke version and kill the dispute!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 11:25 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
The motion you are referring to was denied.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 11:33 am 
Offline
Major Poster
Major Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 12:27 pm
Posts: 96
Location: Slidell, LA
Been Liked: 2 times
Just because it was denied doesn't mean there was no wrong doing? The heart of the document really hits home don't you think?

_________________
If you don't have anything nice to say, say it sarcastically!
The Truth often gets in the way of a good story.
Record companies should make every song in a karaoke version and kill the dispute!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 11:49 am 
Offline
Super Duper Poster
Super Duper Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm
Posts: 2593
Been Liked: 294 times
It seemed more like an agenda driven statement rather than a serious plea. It didn't cite any real evidence to back up the statements nor quote previous cases as examples like most of the other court documents we have seen.

Another document recently posted on here asked for dismissal and then quoted other cases and decisions as a basis for the request (fair use decisions on other cases, etc.). That one also seemed to follow the usual rhetoric but at least made an attempt to back it up by citing previous court decisions. However that one was also dismissed point by point with the judge saying the defendants had "misread" the decisions, etc. If that one didn't make it, I don't think someone just stating their opinion of what is going on really had a chance to succeed.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:19 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
Big Easy wrote:
Just because it was denied doesn't mean there was no wrong doing? The heart of the document really hits home don't you think?


The document you quoted from was full of misstatements of fact and misleading argument, and the court rejected it. As a work of fiction, yeah, sure, I guess it really hits home, but I'd rather read Le Carre or Vonnegut.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:49 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
Big Easy wrote:
Just because it was denied doesn't mean there was no wrong doing? The heart of the document really hits home don't you think?


The document you quoted from was full of misstatements of fact and misleading argument, and the court rejected it. As a work of fiction, yeah, sure, I guess it really hits home, but I'd rather read Le Carre or Vonnegut.


Vonnegut? You just may have a redeeming quality there, Jim :-) . One of my favorites.....

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Last edited by JoeChartreuse on Sat Jun 07, 2014 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 188 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 96 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech