|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
SoundKeg
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 8:26 am |
|
|
newbie |
|
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:49 pm Posts: 9 Location: Mint Hill, North Carolina Been Liked: 4 times
|
Lone Ranger, I am curious , over the years with all of the karaoke manufactures who have never licensed their songs or even tried to to any degree. You seem to have a high disdain for a company that did in fact pay royalties. Are you okay with the part of your library where the companies never tried? If so then I really do not see where you have anything to say...
Plus if you did not purchase your library through manufacturers or distributors, you know it's only a matter of time before the third party lawyers that bring these suits for the publisher's turn their attention to the host. And I imagine the host that can't show that they at least thought they purchased there product by legitimate means.........well lets just say I can't wait to see your post when that happens..............
|
|
Top |
|
|
KaraokeJerry
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 9:04 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 2:28 am Posts: 216 Location: Raleigh, NC Been Liked: 43 times
|
I so much enjoyed November, when you weren't posting. When you're doing stuff just to get a rise out of your "opponents," it's no fun for those of us who are trying to find out what's going on.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 9:26 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
MrBoo wrote: I thought I read that the complaint against KTS had been dismissed? Does this mean the complaint against SC has been resolved as well? The claims against KTS were voluntarily dismissed with prejudice following a settlement with KTS's insurance company. The complaint against SC remains unresolved.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 9:41 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
KaraokeJerry wrote: I so much enjoyed November, when you weren't posting. When you're doing stuff just to get a rise out of your "opponents," it's no fun for those of us who are trying to find out what's going on. I think we find out more by getting a response from the other side than just relying on that which they choose to tell us. Unless you put them on the spot and try to show that their position has some problems with it, all you are ever going to get from them is the spin. Do you think our government would ever tell us the truth unless there were reporters getting responses from them? Asking probing questions. For example do you think we would ever know that the war in Vietnam was going against us unless we had news coverage? The reason the current wars have dragged on so long is there isn't the same level of raw footage showing the battle night after night. The problem is some have grown so used to accepting anything Jim or Kurt put out without questioning it, that others that have a problem with their version of the truth are just trouble makers. They are invading the karaoke bubble.
|
|
Top |
|
|
MrBoo
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:08 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:35 am Posts: 1945 Been Liked: 427 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: The claims against KTS were voluntarily dismissed with prejudice following a settlement with KTS's insurance company. The complaint against SC remains unresolved.
Thank you..
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:43 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
KaraokeJerry wrote: I so much enjoyed November, when you weren't posting. When you're doing stuff just to get a rise out of your "opponents," it's no fun for those of us who are trying to find out what's going on. I think I've been very straightforward in answering questions on this site, when asked. If I can't comment, I say so. So I really don't understand why LR thinks the best way to deal with his lack of information is to make up something in order to force me to "correct the record," instead of simply asking questions. Well, I understand it. It's because he has a lot of hate in his heart for SC, and what he is doing is what Nixon's CREEP (Committee to Re-Elect the President) used to call "ratf---ing." It doesn't have to be true, in fact it's better if it isn't true, because the purpose is to misinform, not enlighten.
|
|
Top |
|
|
SoundKeg
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:45 am |
|
|
newbie |
|
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:49 pm Posts: 9 Location: Mint Hill, North Carolina Been Liked: 4 times
|
Wow, Lone Ranger, I believe you just displayed how biased you are. Couldn't it be that if Sound Choice wins that it shows that they did license things in a legal manner? But I don't see you throwing that scenario out there.
|
|
Top |
|
|
doowhatchulike
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:57 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am Posts: 752 Images: 1 Been Liked: 73 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: I haven't disclosed anything that's not already public information.
KTS did not want to settle, which is why I said that the insurance company settled. Those are the breaks.
LR, your comments have earned you an "ignore." You've decided that when you don't have facts, you'll just make them up. I don't have time to try to keep up with your imagination. Sorry if I am being redundant AND repetitive ( ), but does it actually say somewhere in the available court documents that "KTS did not want to settle"?
|
|
Top |
|
|
doowhatchulike
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:00 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am Posts: 752 Images: 1 Been Liked: 73 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: KaraokeJerry wrote: I so much enjoyed November, when you weren't posting. When you're doing stuff just to get a rise out of your "opponents," it's no fun for those of us who are trying to find out what's going on. I think I've been very straightforward in answering questions on this site, when asked. If I can't comment, I say so. So I really don't understand why LR thinks the best way to deal with his lack of information is to make up something in order to force me to "correct the record," instead of simply asking questions. Well, I understand it. It's because he has a lot of hate in his heart for SC, and what he is doing is what Nixon's CREEP (Committee to Re-Elect the President) used to call "ratf---ing." It doesn't have to be true, in fact it's better if it isn't true, because the purpose is to misinform, not enlighten. I wonder where the second E in the CREEP acronym comes from: is it the second or third E in RE-ELECT or the E in THE ?
|
|
Top |
|
|
kjmann
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:02 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:06 pm Posts: 181 Location: Canby, OR Been Liked: 21 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: ....For example do you think we would ever know that the war in Vietnam was going against us unless we had news coverage? Probably not, but we don't need your "National Enquirer" version of this information. so maybe it's time to shut your trap unless you have some real facts instead of your piss poor interpretation of other peoples statements on this or any other forum. man, you're more of a waste of skin than Chip is. -Sal
_________________ Sal "Kjmann" EsquivelKaraoke With Sal - Website
|
|
Top |
|
|
timberlea
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:32 am |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm Posts: 4094 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada Been Liked: 309 times
|
"I wonder where the second E in the CREEP acronym comes from: is it the second or third E in RE-ELECT or the E in THE ? : I would say the media or the original organization put it in because it sounds so much better than CREP would and gives it a certain slant. As for LR, I guess he never heard the axiom "It's better to keep your mouth shut and thought a fool than to open it and prove it."
_________________ You can be strange but not a stranger
Last edited by timberlea on Mon Dec 16, 2013 3:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 12:27 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
doowhatchulike wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: I haven't disclosed anything that's not already public information.
KTS did not want to settle, which is why I said that the insurance company settled. Those are the breaks.
LR, your comments have earned you an "ignore." You've decided that when you don't have facts, you'll just make them up. I don't have time to try to keep up with your imagination. Sorry if I am being redundant AND repetitive ( ), but does it actually say somewhere in the available court documents that "KTS did not want to settle"? Yes. They filed a motion to that effect, to try to prevent the insurance company from settling.
|
|
Top |
|
|
birdofsong
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 3:07 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:25 am Posts: 965 Been Liked: 118 times
|
kjmann wrote: man, you're more of a waste of skin than Chip is.
-Sal
Charming. It's it really necessary to take shots at Chip? What is the matter with you?
_________________ Birdofsong
|
|
Top |
|
|
kjmann
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 4:47 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:06 pm Posts: 181 Location: Canby, OR Been Liked: 21 times
|
birdofsong wrote: kjmann wrote: man, you're more of a waste of skin than Chip is.
-Sal
Charming. It's it really necessary to take shots at Chip? What is the matter with you? It's Easy to take shots at someone like him. He was absolutely worthless when he was on this forum. In fact, he was the Jerry Springer of this forum (constantly stirring the Sh#t in the pot). My opinion of Chip was common among many people on this forum (Which is probably why he was banned in the first place) and he is a good example of this sort of Crap. It's not my fault that he pissed off so many people that he got banned. I rarely put in my 2 cents in this forum, but LR acts more and more like Chip everyday that he is here and I'm Probably not the only one who thinks so. Piss off if you don't like my opinion of your husband. He made his reputation. Now he has to live with it. The same will eventually be true of LR if he doesn't stop making unsubstantiated statements in this forum.
_________________ Sal "Kjmann" EsquivelKaraoke With Sal - Website
|
|
Top |
|
|
birdofsong
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 4:54 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:25 am Posts: 965 Been Liked: 118 times
|
Whatever. All you do is make yourself look like a total donkey's behind when you take shots at someone who isn't even here to defend himself. There were far more people who appreciated Chip's participation in this forum, along with the proof he backed it up with. Piss off yourself.
_________________ Birdofsong
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:34 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
birdofsong wrote: Whatever. All you do is make yourself look like a total donkey's behind when you take shots at someone who isn't even here to defend himself. There were far more people who appreciated Chip's participation in this forum, along with the proof he backed it up with. Piss off yourself. You mean much the same way that "he who shall be named" brings me up in the Old Jolters Forum on Facebook? Not to mention that he posts inaccurate information and assumptions as well. The difference is that I left the Old Jolters forum on my own instead of getting the boot and I don't feel I need to ask to re-join just to correct his misinformation. I also don't have anyone popping in on my behalf to do it for me. -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
earthling12357
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:14 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm Posts: 1609 Location: Earth Been Liked: 307 times
|
c. staley wrote: I'm downright touched! First, there are a couple of entire threads devoted just little old to me at the "other place" and I'm not even a member! (one of them thanks to Chris Avis (the avid writer) ) Second, I now get a complete "debate style" named after me? All I can say is that I'd like to thank the academy.. and all the little people that made this what it is today..... and so on... and so on....
_________________ KNOW THYSELF
|
|
Top |
|
|
birdofsong
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:37 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:25 am Posts: 965 Been Liked: 118 times
|
chrisavis wrote: You mean much the same way that "he who shall be named" brings me up in the Old Jolters Forum on Facebook? Not to mention that he posts inaccurate information and assumptions as well.
...I left the Old Jolters forum on my own instead of getting the boot and I don't feel I need to ask to re-join just to correct his misinformation.
-Chris
So let me see if I have this straight...you left the Old Jolters, and yet...you can't seem to look away. I do have to agree...Chip is a compelling guy.
_________________ Birdofsong
|
|
Top |
|
|
timberlea
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:41 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm Posts: 4094 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada Been Liked: 309 times
|
The way a train wreck is.
_________________ You can be strange but not a stranger
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 225 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|