|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
TroyVnd27
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 8:14 am |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:10 pm Posts: 933 Location: Twin Lake, MI Been Liked: 59 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: The revenue from GEM license sales far exceeds the revenue from default judgments. Right now it does, but those judgments will hang on to their credit reports for 7 years? 10 years? As time passes - maybe people grow up a little - those defendants will want to make some sort of settlement. ALSO - as time passes, SC will come to realize that they will probably never collect the full balance, if anything at all. The plaintiff will then want to offer some sort of settlement. AND - maybe SC will assign those judgments to a collection agency for a fraction of the judgment value. Even at 5 cents on the dollar, that's a lot of money when you consider how many defaults there are. That's why I bet that, in the long run, those defaults will pay off better than the judgments.
_________________ I'm not a cheerleader, but I paid for my pom poms with my own money!
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 9:25 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
cueball wrote: chrisavis wrote: It doesn't take a accusation from Sound Choice for people to formulate an opinion around whether someone is a pirate or not.
-Chris I have to disagree with you there Chris. I have to bring up old news here. When Rodney (from California) was listed in a SC lawsuit from APS, he came on this forum to tell us that there were others (on a different forum) who were falsely accusing him of being a pirate and spreading the word, and this was based SOLELY on APS's accusation (on behalf of SC). And, if memory serves me correctly, "Insane KJ" was one of the people leading that crusade. There were one or two others from here that also formed and expressed negative opinions of Rodney ALL BASED ON that 1 accusation. You misunderstood what I was saying. People will formulate their opinions regardless of what Sound Choice has to say about it. Sound Choice actions may help formulate opinions, but they aren't the only catalyst. -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
Insane KJ
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 10:31 am |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:24 pm Posts: 317 Been Liked: 18 times
|
cueball wrote: I have to disagree with you there Chris. I have to bring up old news here. When Rodney (from California) was listed in a SC lawsuit from APS, he came on this forum to tell us that there were others (on a different forum) who were falsely accusing him of being a pirate and spreading the word, and this was based SOLELY on APS's accusation (on behalf of SC). And, if memory serves me correctly, "Insane KJ" was one of the people leading that crusade. You are incorrect Cue regarding me commenting on Rodney's case. I reported only facts. Some of those facts were pictures from Rodney's publicly accessible myspace and facebook pages he had/has to promote his karaoke business. Commenting on those pictures, I clearly pointed out that discs could be seen in many of the pictures along with a computer. If anything, I was showing that there was doubt that Rodney was a pirate. From the "other" forum:InsaneKJ wrote: Next is an image from KaraokeFest 2009 captured from Rodney's public MySpace pages that clearly shows CD Cases/Wallets/Binders layed out to Rodney's left. KS rules prohibit links to other forums. If anyone would like a direct link to my posts regarding Rodney on that "other" forum, please PM me.
_________________ -- Mark
|
|
Top |
|
|
earthling12357
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 12:07 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm Posts: 1609 Location: Earth Been Liked: 307 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: The publishers benefit from most settlements precisely because they receive a royalty on the replacement product that the settling operator receives. Didn't the publishers already receive their royalty when the replacement product was produced and imported to this country? Are there additional payments due the publishers each time a set is sold?
_________________ KNOW THYSELF
|
|
Top |
|
|
doowhatchulike
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 9:49 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am Posts: 752 Images: 1 Been Liked: 73 times
|
earthling12357 wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: The publishers benefit from most settlements precisely because they receive a royalty on the replacement product that the settling operator receives. Didn't the publishers already receive their royalty when the replacement product was produced and imported to this country? Are there additional payments due the publishers each time a set is sold? It could be that the publishers look at it as a means of skirting a higher rate to the publishers by repackaging it in the UK, especially material that was already produced in the US to begin with...
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 10:31 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
doowhatchulike wrote: earthling12357 wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: The publishers benefit from most settlements precisely because they receive a royalty on the replacement product that the settling operator receives. Didn't the publishers already receive their royalty when the replacement product was produced and imported to this country? Are there additional payments due the publishers each time a set is sold? It could be that the publishers look at it as a means of skirting a higher rate to the publishers by repackaging it in the UK, especially material that was already produced in the US to begin with... Which brings up a point: Since SC skirted U.S. licensing by way of PRS in the U.K, would any royalties be of the same amount they would have been if licensed here? I doubt it, or licensing wouldn't be so much less expensive over there. Yup, this may just be an "SC thing", and not industry wide..
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 2:27 am |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: Which brings up a point: Since SC skirted U.S. licensing by way of PRS in the U.K, would any royalties be of the same amount they would have been if licensed here? I doubt it, or licensing wouldn't be so much less expensive over there.
interesting point.....there didn't seem to be an issue with MCPS licensing in the U.S. until this happened.....
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 225 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|