Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked:634 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
No, still comical.
You find amusing James that someone would want to avoid trouble with you, by not using your product? It's comical not to condone theft of your product? That is funny someone would be opposed to your product not on the merits of that product, but because they know buying your product helps to fund your activities not all of which are approved of? Now that's comical. Just like wanting everyone to belief the reason you couldn't get licensing for your new product isn't connected with possible theft of your old product at least as far as the publishers are concerned. Have a funny legal day.
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked:334 times
DannyG2006 wrote:
Joe, there are 201, counting an update disc that contains songs they messed up on in the main collection.
Thanks, Danny. I have to admit that this question had nothing to do with the thread. A KJ friend simply asked be to find out for him.... Appreciate your help..
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
You find amusing James that someone would want to avoid trouble with you, by not using your product? It's comical not to condone theft of your product? That is funny someone would be opposed to your product not on the merits of that product, but because they know buying your product helps to fund your activities not all of which are approved of? Now that's comical. Just like wanting everyone to belief the reason you couldn't get licensing for your new product isn't connected with possible theft of your old product at least as far as the publishers are concerned. Have a funny legal day.
