|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:27 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
Lonman wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: If we both get where we are supposed to be going what difference does it make how we get there? The start of this thread began with a value comparison of two similar products. When you crunch the numbers I think that DK is the better value for the money. That a host will recoup the cost of the initial investment quicker with the DK brand over the SC brand. That DK holds it's value better than most brands. I thought everyone wanted a value comparison. Have a blessed day. I guess if I wasn't concerned about getting younger singers, DK all the way. Like you said you run a show of old farts for singers. They AREN'T going to care what it is. I run a show of younger, a lot of musicians some are trained singers, then some just know after being able to teach them, know different versions & do have preferences in brand that DO care about quality and the sound - and having stuff other than what DK produced plus having stuff at least 10 years AFTER what DK produced. So IMO the SC is a MUCH better value for that kind of a show. Older customers have more disposable income than many younger patrons, a fact that is not lost on many venue owners.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Insane KJ
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:29 am |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:24 pm Posts: 317 Been Liked: 18 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: It has been my experience that most patrons are more interested in if you have a particular song rather than the brand of the song. If they do request a brand it is usually DK, sometimes CB and a few times Zoom. Then you may want to buy this library for your show Ranger. That way you would have the most awesome show in your region with 50,000 freeware songs that your patrons would most be interested in! http://www.ebay.com/itm/50-thousad-of-K ... 589f6e2558
_________________ -- Mark
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:32 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: Lonman wrote: I guess if I wasn't concerned about getting younger singers, DK all the way. Like you said you run a show of old farts for singers. They AREN'T going to care what it is. I run a show of younger, a lot of musicians some are trained singers, then some just know after being able to teach them, know different versions & do have preferences in brand that DO care about quality and the sound - and having stuff other than what DK produced plus having stuff at least 10 years AFTER what DK produced. So IMO the SC is a MUCH better value for that kind of a show. Older customers have more disposable income than many younger patrons, a fact that is not lost on many venue owners. Oh again I disagree. I see the younger singers repeaditly hitting the 'bomb' drinks more often that are anywhere from $8-12 per hit. While the older singers tend to nurse a drink or a couple beers - that is also a fact. They may have more disposable income, but are usually smarter with their money & don't spend as much on booze like they used to do when they were younger and stupid!
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:33 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: So the enforcement of your rights does prop up the value of the SC product, without the legal process, your product would be in a free fall situation, as far as price. So there is an inflation of the price of the product. Have a legal day. The only thing this demonstrates is your lack of understanding of the term "inflation." The price of anything goes down if consumers are free to take it without consequences. The legal process is about establishing consequences. Despite your efforts to denigrate the process and the product, there is nothing illegitimate about either. I didn't say it was true inflation, I said the price of the product is higher due to legal process acting as a price support mechanism, rather than let market forces determine the value of the product. In other words the price is being manipulated by other than pure market forces. The process is flawed and needs to go back to the drawing board. Have a legal day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:35 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
Insane KJ wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: It has been my experience that most patrons are more interested in if you have a particular song rather than the brand of the song. If they do request a brand it is usually DK, sometimes CB and a few times Zoom. Then you may want to buy this library for your show Ranger. That way you would have the most awesome show in your region with 50,000 freeware songs that your patrons would most be interested in! http://www.ebay.com/itm/50-thousad-of-K ... 589f6e2558 I have all the library I currently need Insane. Have an Insane day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
timberlea
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:59 am |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm Posts: 4094 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada Been Liked: 309 times
|
Cue I've had White Castle and they were okay. As for Bud it would be a serious think of whether I'd drink it or die of thirst Lone the only reason the price would be lower is everyone is stealing and it is the enforcement that's keeping it at its true value. Honestly, if everyone were to buy a new car, then duplicating them (or making a duplicate of a duplicate from a friend), and using them forever or replacing the duplicates when needed, exactly what would the value of a car be? Nothing. I wonder if Ford, GM, Toyota, etc would accept that?
_________________ You can be strange but not a stranger
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 2:38 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: If we both get where we are supposed to be going what difference does it make how we get there? To you, a car is a car. Just transportation from Point A --> Point B. I spend 2+ hours in my vehicle every day, more on the weekends. I want to enjoy the ride in as much comfort and safety as possible. To you, karaoke music is karaoke music. Just get the most songs for the least amount of money possible. I want the best quality music and the most faithful reproductions of the originals. Do my fans notice? Some do, some don't. But I notice. It matters to me. Look. Some people are fine with hamburger! I prefer an aged steak. (Medium rare please). timberlea wrote: As for Bud it would be a serious think of whether I'd drink it or die of thirst ? Agreed! I'll order a cocktail before drinking "BMC" (Bud/Miller/Coors). Light, Ultra Light, Super Ultra Light, Mega Super-Duper Ultra Ice Platinum Light...it's a mass marketed, watered down race to the bottom to see who can make the beer that has the least flavor. Reminds me of a Microbew Ad I once saw that said "Whats the matter Lager boy? Afraid you might actually TASTE something?"
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 2:49 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: I didn't say it was true inflation, I said the price of the product is higher due to legal process acting as a price support mechanism, rather than let market forces determine the value of the product. In other words the price is being manipulated by other than pure market forces. The process is flawed and needs to go back to the drawing board. Have a legal day. I would include "theft" as an "other than pure market force." Eliminate both the legal process and the theft, and you might have an argument. Of course, you can't eliminate the theft except through the legal process. If that is your "moral" objection to the legal process, then your opinion is of no value. It's a fantasy.
|
|
Top |
|
|
timberlea
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 4:16 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm Posts: 4094 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada Been Liked: 309 times
|
Oh BTW try to open a hamburger joint and call it McDonald's (even if your last name is McDonald) and see how quick the Clown comes at you with legal action.
_________________ You can be strange but not a stranger
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 3:32 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: I didn't say it was true inflation, I said the price of the product is higher due to legal process acting as a price support mechanism, rather than let market forces determine the value of the product. In other words the price is being manipulated by other than pure market forces. The process is flawed and needs to go back to the drawing board. Have a legal day. I would include "theft" as an "other than pure market force." Eliminate both the legal process and the theft, and you might have an argument. Of course, you can't eliminate the theft except through the legal process. If that is your "moral" objection to the legal process, then your opinion is of no value. It's a fantasy. The only fantasy is Yours James and Kurt that this legal process of yours is going to solve the piracy problem anytime before SC itself goes under. I'm not the only host that has a problem with this legal solution of yours. SC is the only manu currently employing this legal process, if it is such a superior policy why haven't other manus come on board? Some hosts are even coming to the conclusion that maybe amnesty and licensing is the answer to the piracy problem. With industry wide theft reaching 95% of the SC product and your process only addressing less than 1% of the active hosts and venues after all this time, doesn't it stand to reason this process is broken and not working? With the exception of maybe a few select areas of the country. I know us big bad KJ's are beating up on poor little SC. The problem is SC, rather than a manu, has become their legal process, and that is why they are getting beat up on. Not for who they are but rather for their behavior. It is possible not to hate a person for who or what they are, but you can dislike their actions. You tell them you don't like what they do by not buying their product or using their service. Naturally the legal process is the only solution for you since you are a lawyer, how could it be any other way? To date this legal solution of yours has not worked that well, mainly because you don't have the resources as one enfeebled company to make it work, like it needs to. SC might have been able to turn things around if they would have joined Cloud, but that didn't happen. My objection is not morale it is practical, pragmatic and business centered. The definition of insanity is to repeat the same action over and over again and expect a different result. Have a legal day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 3:40 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
Lonman wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: Lonman wrote: I guess if I wasn't concerned about getting younger singers, DK all the way. Like you said you run a show of old farts for singers. They AREN'T going to care what it is. I run a show of younger, a lot of musicians some are trained singers, then some just know after being able to teach them, know different versions & do have preferences in brand that DO care about quality and the sound - and having stuff other than what DK produced plus having stuff at least 10 years AFTER what DK produced. So IMO the SC is a MUCH better value for that kind of a show. Older customers have more disposable income than many younger patrons, a fact that is not lost on many venue owners. Oh again I disagree. I see the younger singers repeaditly hitting the 'bomb' drinks more often that are anywhere from $8-12 per hit. While the older singers tend to nurse a drink or a couple beers - that is also a fact. They may have more disposable income, but are usually smarter with their money & don't spend as much on booze like they used to do when they were younger and stupid! Lonnie if I really had a problem making the venues money I wouldn't be working six days a week. Have a blessed day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 3:50 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
Bazza wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: If we both get where we are supposed to be going what difference does it make how we get there? To you, a car is a car. Just transportation from Point A --> Point B. I spend 2+ hours in my vehicle every day, more on the weekends. I want to enjoy the ride in as much comfort and safety as possible. To you, karaoke music is karaoke music. Just get the most songs for the least amount of money possible. I want the best quality music and the most faithful reproductions of the originals. Do my fans notice? Some do, some don't. But I notice. It matters to me. Look. Some people are fine with hamburger! I prefer an aged steak. (Medium rare please). timberlea wrote: As for Bud it would be a serious think of whether I'd drink it or die of thirst ? Agreed! I'll order a cocktail before drinking "BMC" (Bud/Miller/Coors). Light, Ultra Light, Super Ultra Light, Mega Super-Duper Ultra Ice Platinum Light...it's a mass marketed, watered down race to the bottom to see who can make the beer that has the least flavor. Reminds me of a Microbew Ad I once saw that said "Whats the matter Lager boy? Afraid you might actually TASTE something?" Gee Bazza I thought you are a hard nosed businessman, you don't watch your bottom line? I don't feel I'm losing any quality by avoiding the SC label. Most of my customers want DK, I play to the crowd. If they all started demanding SC I would have to rethink the boycott and maybe license GEM that hasn't happened yet. It is true I do watch costs a habit I picked up from my parents who were children during the Great Depression. That is why I don't have any debt. I own all my equipment and music, and run my business on the principles of hard work, cost containment, and family centered service to my customers. It has worked fairly well for me, can't say it will work for everyone. Have a blessed day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
leopard lizard
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 8:01 am |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm Posts: 2593 Been Liked: 294 times
|
One reason for SC staying high is also the types of songs they put out. Some shows may not have these types of singers but I get requests for Blues songs and Headbanger songs that were mainly just put out by SC. So often not only do they require a bit of tracking down but I pay the price to get them.
|
|
Top |
|
|
NoShameKaraoke
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 9:31 am |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 5:09 pm Posts: 481 Been Liked: 158 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: So the enforcement of your rights does prop up the value of the SC product, without the legal process, your product would be in a free fall situation, as far as price. So there is an inflation of the price of the product. Have a legal day. The only thing this demonstrates is your lack of understanding of the term "inflation." The price of anything goes down if consumers are free to take it without consequences. The legal process is about establishing consequences. Despite your efforts to denigrate the process and the product, there is nothing illegitimate about either. That's exactly what I was trying to get at. With inflation, the cost--what you actually paid for that set--is closer to $2K, which significantly alters the cost-per-track of your DK set vs a Gem series set.
_________________ Co-host of The Greatest Song Ever Sung (Poorly), a karaoke-themed podcast
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 11:41 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: Lonnie if I really had a problem making the venues money I wouldn't be working six days a week. Have a blessed day. Me neither working 7 nights a week for 20 years. But as a host I enjoy the younger crowd as they sing the music I like. I would put a bullet in brain if I had nights with standards and older music nightly.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 12:09 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
cueball wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: As I said, the few places left that SC allows to sell the product take advantage of the fact and use the SC fear factor( Even Lon posted: "I used to be able to pick up SC discs for $5-10 all day long in bulk buys up until the lawsuits started, then the prices doubled & tripled.") to gauge the customers. For example: In my opinion, Ace does this as well. I could be wrong, but I don't recall ever seeing the vendors (both B&M Stores and those familiar ONLINE stores with websites such as Karaoke.com, doowop.com, Ace Karaoke, etc...) ever offer a SC Spotlight disc at $5. I think Lonnie was referring to e-bay sales when he said he used to get them for $5-10 each. The regular Vendors (who sold/sell them in their B&M stores and through their ONLINE sales, haven't raised the prices. They're still selling them at whatever price they were charging 4 years ago (pre-lawsuits). While you are not wrong in regard to e-bay and other used prices,you are in regard to the new price structure as based on the new fear based pricing. The regular vendors that still exist HAVE raised their pricing by a huge percentage- again, Ace being the leader. They are NOT charging the pre-litigation prices.
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 1:14 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
That last Spotlight I bought from Ace was about 5 years ago, I paid $24.95. They are charging $22.95 now days.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 3:26 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
Lonman wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: Lonnie if I really had a problem making the venues money I wouldn't be working six days a week. Have a blessed day. Me neither working 7 nights a week for 20 years. But as a host I enjoy the younger crowd as they sing the music I like. I would put a bullet in brain if I had nights with standards and older music nightly. That is because you are younger Lonman, remember I'll be 68 this July, older music was what I was raised on, so I fit in perfectly with my target market the baby boomers. There is still a lot of life in us senior citizens, they say 60 is the new forty. My parents taught me to treat older citizens with respect. They always told me some day you'll be old yourself. Guess what it happened and some day it will happen to everyone, if they live long enough. Have a blessed day. P.S. Has far as a bullet to the brain I feel that way when a young singer comes up and starts rapping, or someone does heavy metal, that is why karaoke is something that can be applied to all groups. I have specialized much like a doctor and it has paid off for me.
Last edited by The Lone Ranger on Thu May 02, 2013 3:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 3:34 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
NoShameKaraoke wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: So the enforcement of your rights does prop up the value of the SC product, without the legal process, your product would be in a free fall situation, as far as price. So there is an inflation of the price of the product. Have a legal day. The only thing this demonstrates is your lack of understanding of the term "inflation." The price of anything goes down if consumers are free to take it without consequences. The legal process is about establishing consequences. Despite your efforts to denigrate the process and the product, there is nothing illegitimate about either. That's exactly what I was trying to get at. With inflation, the cost--what you actually paid for that set--is closer to $2K, which significantly alters the cost-per-track of your DK set vs a Gem series set. I suppose if you were to buy DK today, or you could pay nothing if you are willing to assume the risk as James has suggested. The value of any item is only what a person will pay for it a a given time. You could pay 1500.00 for an ounce of gold, if you are hungry you could trade it for a can of beans, depending on how bad you wanted the beans. Values vary with varying conditions, part of the added price of the GEM series is the legal process, since it seems to be a cost currently incurred only by the SC label. Have a blessed day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 4:14 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
Lonman wrote: That last Spotlight I bought from Ace was about 5 years ago, I paid $24.95. They are charging $22.95 now days. Which means the prices are stable for the most part, trading in a narrow range. The reason the price has come down a little I suppose that most of the hosts that buy product, for the most part have what they need already. The only potential growth part of the market is the 95% that have assumed the risk and have not purchased. The product out here has been purchased by the retailer for sale and SC a long time ago has been paid. New sales revolve around the licensing of the GEM series, and these are helped by the current legal process pushed by SC. If the legal process were to stop, you would have to see where the prices of discs and GEM would go. My feeling is the direction would be down, since prices are currently held high by this legal process price fixing mechanism. Have a blessed day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 93 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|