|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:38 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
Paradigm Karaoke wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: Only one problem James since the enforcement mechanism is not being employed for the DK product, using your reasoning shouldn't the value drop to zero along with that of the other non enforcement manus? There are two mechanisms that would explain why there is residual value for the DK product even though it can be obtained for free or nearly free. First, there may be some subjective value to owning the actual discs themselves. It could be sentimental value, or lack of familiarity with the mechanisms for obtaining the material electronically, or even lack of reliable internet (for example, my in-laws can't get cable or DSL internet, so they make do with dial-up). Second, while we say that a product can be obtained for free or nearly free, it does involve taking and using the product without paying for it. That does make a lot of people uncomfortable even if there are no consequences. Such persons would be more comfortable purchasing the product. If neither of these apply, the price is actually free. but why do none of these apply to SC? Because we are actively enforcing our IP rights.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:04 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
jclaydon wrote: The fact remains that Chris posted links with direct evidence that RARER sound choice discs are selling for $29.99 for ONE DISC.
that is well above current retail value for the little stock of in print discs that retailers are selling on ebay for an average of $17 plus shipping.
my local brick and motar store sells them for $25 which is why i don't buy from them any more Please note my emboldens. RARE is always more expensive. Keep in mind WHY they are rare, as well. There are a lot of SC discs out there, but the rare ones are those that had to be pulled. As I said, the few places left that SC allows to sell the product take advantage of the fact and use the SC fear factor ( Even Lon posted: "I used to be able to pick up SC discs for $5-10 all day long in bulk buys up until the lawsuits started, then the prices doubled & tripled.") to gauge the customers. For example: In my opinion, Ace does this as well. It's not quality that gets whatever money they get. It's fear-based inflation. I will agree with Jim that sentimentality may also have some bearing on those buy DKs, but the fact is DK's discs contain an incredibly high percentage of quality OFTEN-USED tracks, as compared to the Spotlight series from SC, which had maybe 3 per disc. This is one reason why what SC discs I have are mostly Artist series. Still only 2 or 3 per disc tops, but the multi-plexes were WAY cheaper).
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:36 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: Because we are actively enforcing our IP rights. HarringtonLaw wrote: First, there may be some subjective value to owning the actual discs themselves. It could be sentimental value, or lack of familiarity with the mechanisms for obtaining the material electronically, or even lack of reliable internet (for example, my in-laws can't get cable or DSL internet, so they make do with dial-up). this does not apply to SC? why not? HarringtonLaw wrote: Second, while we say that a product can be obtained for free or nearly free, it does involve taking and using the product without paying for it. That does make a lot of people uncomfortable even if there are no consequences. Such persons would be more comfortable purchasing the product. this doesnt apply to SC? why not? Because we are actively enforcing our IP rights.[/quote]
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:05 am |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: As I said, the few places left that SC allows to sell the product take advantage of the fact and use the SC fear factor( Even Lon posted: "I used to be able to pick up SC discs for $5-10 all day long in bulk buys up until the lawsuits started, then the prices doubled & tripled.") to gauge the customers. For example: In my opinion, Ace does this as well. I could be wrong, but I don't recall ever seeing the vendors (both B&M Stores and those familiar ONLINE stores with websites such as Karaoke.com, doowop.com, Ace Karaoke, etc...) ever offer a SC Spotlight disc at $5. I think Lonnie was referring to e-bay sales when he said he used to get them for $5-10 each. The regular Vendors (who sold/sell them in their B&M stores and through their ONLINE sales, haven't raised the prices. They're still selling them at whatever price they were charging 4 years ago (pre-lawsuits).
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:07 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: Please note my emboldens. RARE is always more expensive. Keep in mind WHY they are rare, as well. There are a lot of SC discs out there, but the rare ones are those that had to be pulled. They didn't always fall under the category 'had to be pulled', there were those that they simply didn't renew and moved the songs that did sell to another disc. Quote: As I said, the few places left that SC allows to sell the product take advantage of the fact and use the SC fear factor( Even Lon posted: "I used to be able to pick up SC discs for $5-10 all day long in bulk buys up until the lawsuits started, then the prices doubled & tripled.") to gauge the customers. For example: In my opinion, Ace does this as well. But again I was going with bulk sales - not individual discs. The bulks I used to pick up were discontinued or out of print discs that were included in the sale. I don't SEE the bulk sales as often as I used to. The retail sale for new discs is the same as it's always been anywhere between 15-18 per disc. That I have not seen change - except go lower over the years. When I first started buying SC (or ANY brand for that matter), they usually ran anywhere from 20-35 per disc. Quote: I will agree with Jim that sentimentality may also have some bearing on those buy DKs, but the fact is DK's discs contain an incredibly high percentage of quality OFTEN-USED tracks, as compared to the Spotlight series from SC, which had maybe 3 per disc. This is one reason why what SC discs I have are mostly Artist series. Still only 2 or 3 per disc tops, but the multi-plexes were WAY cheaper). DK is still not a highly requested brand around here - again, west coast started with Pioneer - I get more requests for Pioneer over DK for the older stuff.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:09 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
cueball wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: As I said, the few places left that SC allows to sell the product take advantage of the fact and use the SC fear factor( Even Lon posted: "I used to be able to pick up SC discs for $5-10 all day long in bulk buys up until the lawsuits started, then the prices doubled & tripled.") to gauge the customers. For example: In my opinion, Ace does this as well. I could be wrong, but I don't recall ever seeing the vendors (both B&M Stores and those familiar ONLINE stores with websites such as Karaoke.com, doowop.com, Ace Karaoke, etc...) ever offer a SC Spotlight disc at $5. I think Lonnie was referring to e-bay sales when he said he used to get them for $5-10 each. The regular Vendors (who sold/sell them in their B&M stores and through their ONLINE sales, haven't raised the prices. They're still selling them at whatever price they were charging 4 years ago (pre-lawsuits). Ebay sales were exactly what I was talking about. However on rare occasion I would find an overstock sale at karaoke.com where you could buy 3 Spotlights for $20.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 5:57 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
NoShameKaraoke wrote: Out of curiosity, Lone Ranger--when did you buy your DK set, and for how much? Back in the early 90's when I first started doing hosting, and I paid $1,000.00 for a never opened box. The host that had ordered the set put a 200.00 deposit on it and then never picked it up. The mom and pop shop where I used to buy all my music and equipment said I could have it for a thousand, it has been one of the best investments I have ever made, as far a return of initial cost. Have a blessed day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
timberlea
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 6:00 am |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm Posts: 4094 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada Been Liked: 309 times
|
And what was the sticker price on it?
_________________ You can be strange but not a stranger
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 6:05 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
timberlea wrote: And what was the sticker price on it? I would think originally it must have been around $1200.00, it doesn't matter since I have made many times over it's original price.
|
|
Top |
|
|
timberlea
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 6:31 am |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm Posts: 4094 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada Been Liked: 309 times
|
Bottom line, anyone who says brand names have no value, have no idea what they are talking about.
Is a car just a car or a hamburger just a hamburger or a is a box of corn flakes just a box of corn flakes. If so then why do we go to different brands, whether Yugo or Rolls Royce or McDonald's or a Wendy's or Kellog's or no name. A good brand name is usually better quality and consistent. Sure once in a while a lower or no name can be better but not usually.
_________________ You can be strange but not a stranger
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 6:40 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
timberlea wrote: Bottom line, anyone who says brand names have no value, have no idea what they are talking about.
Is a car just a car or a hamburger just a hamburger or a is a box of corn flakes just a box of corn flakes. If so then why do we go to different brands, whether Yugo or Rolls Royce or McDonald's or a Wendy's or Kellog's or no name. A good brand name is usually better quality and consistent. Sure once in a while a lower or no name can be better but not usually. Exactly what I said earlier. Lone prefers his 1972 VW Bug. I prefer my Mercedes. To each his own.
|
|
Top |
|
|
BruceFan4Life
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:32 am |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:03 pm Posts: 2674 Location: Jersey Been Liked: 160 times
|
timberlea wrote: Bottom line, anyone who says brand names have no value, have no idea what they are talking about.
Is a car just a car or a hamburger just a hamburger or a is a box of corn flakes just a box of corn flakes. If so then why do we go to different brands, whether Yugo or Rolls Royce or McDonald's or a Wendy's or Kellog's or no name. A good brand name is usually better quality and consistent. Sure once in a while a lower or no name can be better but not usually. Some people are quite happy buying a Corvette with all of the logos removed, if it saves them some money. It still runs like a Corvette and looks like a Corvette. I've been seeing more and more tracks that look like Sound Choice tracks but they don't say Sound Choice on them. The singers don't seem to mind not seeing a particular logo when they are singing.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:50 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
timberlea wrote: Bottom line, anyone who says brand names have no value, have no idea what they are talking about.
Is a car just a car or a hamburger just a hamburger or a is a box of corn flakes just a box of corn flakes. If so then why do we go to different brands, whether Yugo or Rolls Royce or McDonald's or a Wendy's or Kellog's or no name. A good brand name is usually better quality and consistent. Sure once in a while a lower or no name can be better but not usually. I never said brand names have no value, some brands are just a better value for the money. If the brand gets the job done and it's more cost effective why not use it? It is possible not to use some brands and still be successful in this industry. It's all about choice isn't it? Have a blessed day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:55 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
Bazza wrote: timberlea wrote: Bottom line, anyone who says brand names have no value, have no idea what they are talking about.
Is a car just a car or a hamburger just a hamburger or a is a box of corn flakes just a box of corn flakes. If so then why do we go to different brands, whether Yugo or Rolls Royce or McDonald's or a Wendy's or Kellog's or no name. A good brand name is usually better quality and consistent. Sure once in a while a lower or no name can be better but not usually. Exactly what I said earlier. Lone prefers his 1972 VW Bug. I prefer my Mercedes. To each his own. If we both get where we are supposed to be going what difference does it make how we get there? The start of this thread began with a value comparison of two similar products. When you crunch the numbers I think that DK is the better value for the money. That a host will recoup the cost of the initial investment quicker with the DK brand over the SC brand. That DK holds it's value better than most brands. I thought everyone wanted a value comparison. Have a blessed day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:03 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
BruceFan4Life wrote: timberlea wrote: Bottom line, anyone who says brand names have no value, have no idea what they are talking about.
Is a car just a car or a hamburger just a hamburger or a is a box of corn flakes just a box of corn flakes. If so then why do we go to different brands, whether Yugo or Rolls Royce or McDonald's or a Wendy's or Kellog's or no name. A good brand name is usually better quality and consistent. Sure once in a while a lower or no name can be better but not usually. Some people are quite happy buying a Corvette with all of the logos removed, if it saves them some money. It still runs like a Corvette and looks like a Corvette. I've been seeing more and more tracks that look like Sound Choice tracks but they don't say Sound Choice on them. The singers don't seem to mind not seeing a particular logo when they are singing. It has been my experience that most patrons are more interested in if you have a particular song rather than the brand of the song. If they do request a brand it is usually DK, sometimes CB and a few times Zoom.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:08 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: Paradigm Karaoke wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: Only one problem James since the enforcement mechanism is not being employed for the DK product, using your reasoning shouldn't the value drop to zero along with that of the other non enforcement manus? There are two mechanisms that would explain why there is residual value for the DK product even though it can be obtained for free or nearly free. First, there may be some subjective value to owning the actual discs themselves. It could be sentimental value, or lack of familiarity with the mechanisms for obtaining the material electronically, or even lack of reliable internet (for example, my in-laws can't get cable or DSL internet, so they make do with dial-up). Second, while we say that a product can be obtained for free or nearly free, it does involve taking and using the product without paying for it. That does make a lot of people uncomfortable even if there are no consequences. Such persons would be more comfortable purchasing the product. If neither of these apply, the price is actually free. but why do none of these apply to SC? Because we are actively enforcing our IP rights. So the enforcement of your rights does prop up the value of the SC product, without the legal process, your product would be in a free fall situation, as far as price. So there is an inflation of the price of the product. Have a legal day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:25 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
Bazza wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: The point is Bazza using the example of Brian I could sell my original set of DK for more than I originally gave for it. You would have to ask for less than you originally paid to license your set of GEM, otherwise the host could just license directly from SC. Also if this legal process of SC fails, what will the GEM license be worth, since it's price is probably tied to the SC legal price support system also? One thing I agree with you on, what does it matter if by the time SC collapses you have made back your initial investment many times over? Have a blessed day. I didn't license the GEM set in the hopes that one day I could resell the license for a profit. Anyone that thinks karaoke music is some kind of investment needs their head examined. I licensed GEM because I wanted the best base set in the business. Some simply want the lowest price songs they can find. I am willing to pay more for the highest quality. It isn't an investment for future resale profit, it is, however, an investment in your business which does have value, as far as the host earnings.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:08 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: So the enforcement of your rights does prop up the value of the SC product, without the legal process, your product would be in a free fall situation, as far as price. So there is an inflation of the price of the product. Have a legal day. The only thing this demonstrates is your lack of understanding of the term "inflation." The price of anything goes down if consumers are free to take it without consequences. The legal process is about establishing consequences. Despite your efforts to denigrate the process and the product, there is nothing illegitimate about either.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:24 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: If we both get where we are supposed to be going what difference does it make how we get there? The start of this thread began with a value comparison of two similar products. When you crunch the numbers I think that DK is the better value for the money. That a host will recoup the cost of the initial investment quicker with the DK brand over the SC brand. That DK holds it's value better than most brands. I thought everyone wanted a value comparison. Have a blessed day. I guess if I wasn't concerned about getting younger singers, DK all the way. Like you said you run a show of old farts for singers. They AREN'T going to care what it is. I run a show of younger, a lot of musicians some are trained singers, then some just know after being able to teach them, know different versions & do have preferences in brand that DO care about quality and the sound - and having stuff other than what DK produced plus having stuff at least 10 years AFTER what DK produced. So IMO the SC is a MUCH better value for that kind of a show.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:28 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: BruceFan4Life wrote: timberlea wrote: Bottom line, anyone who says brand names have no value, have no idea what they are talking about.
Is a car just a car or a hamburger just a hamburger or a is a box of corn flakes just a box of corn flakes. If so then why do we go to different brands, whether Yugo or Rolls Royce or McDonald's or a Wendy's or Kellog's or no name. A good brand name is usually better quality and consistent. Sure once in a while a lower or no name can be better but not usually. Some people are quite happy buying a Corvette with all of the logos removed, if it saves them some money. It still runs like a Corvette and looks like a Corvette. I've been seeing more and more tracks that look like Sound Choice tracks but they don't say Sound Choice on them. The singers don't seem to mind not seeing a particular logo when they are singing. It has been my experience that most patrons are more interested in if you have a particular song rather than the brand of the song. If they do request a brand it is usually DK, sometimes CB and a few times Zoom. I had this happen last night. I bought an SBI version of a newer song - can't remember right now, have it written down, but the singer came to me later saying he didn't like it at all. So I will start looking for a replacement - he's a good customer. It was a country song, i'll see if Digitrax has it.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: toqer and 101 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|