|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 15 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 12:53 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
After almost 2 years, the one and only absolutely definite pirate (track thief) includeded in the NJ suits is still up and running multiple shows on the same night with no interruption.
Way to go........ Helluva job fighting actual piracy....
FADING.....fading.....fading....fading....
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Smoothedge69
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:16 am |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am Posts: 3885 Images: 0 Been Liked: 397 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: After almost 2 years, the one and only absolutely definite pirate (track thief) includeded in the NJ suits is still up and running multiple shows on the same night with no interruption.
Way to go........ Helluva job fighting actual piracy....
FADING.....fading.....fading....fading.... There obviously isn't any money in going after your pirate. He probably can't afford the GEM series, or he can't pay a settlement. You're surprised, why???
_________________ I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:32 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
Smoothedge69 wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: After almost 2 years, the one and only absolutely definite pirate (track thief) includeded in the NJ suits is still up and running multiple shows on the same night with no interruption.
Way to go........ Helluva job fighting actual piracy....
FADING.....fading.....fading....fading.... There obviously isn't any money in going after your pirate. He probably can't afford the GEM series, or he can't pay a settlement. You're surprised, why??? This seems to be the pattern a big case filed with multiple suits some hosts get brow beaten into settling and the hosts that don't simply walk, since their is no follow through on the evidence being provided. Makes you wonder why any host would pay SC, especially since the agents you pay don't seem to be turning the money over to SC. Happy New Year smooth, Joe.
|
|
Top |
|
|
rickgood
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:47 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:09 pm Posts: 839 Location: Myrtle Beach, SC Been Liked: 224 times
|
Joe some of the same here in Raleigh, hire a decent lawyer and you can string it out for years it appears. I guess the evidence gathered by SC wasn't that impactful, plus some that weren't pirates caught up in the deal and still unable to get their names cleared. Maybe SC needs new or better lawyers, the ones they have can't seem to close the deal.
|
|
Top |
|
|
BruceFan4Life
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:26 am |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:03 pm Posts: 2674 Location: Jersey Been Liked: 160 times
|
Karaoke Pirates in NJ??? Say it isn't so. I just can't believe it.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:12 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
rickgood wrote: Joe some of the same here in Raleigh, hire a decent lawyer and you can string it out for years it appears. I guess the evidence gathered by SC wasn't that impactful, plus some that weren't pirates caught up in the deal and still unable to get their names cleared. Maybe SC needs new or better lawyers, the ones they have can't seem to close the deal. I wasn't surprised, and the pirate never bothered with a lawyer. As a matter of fact, it doesn't look like the suit has been pursued. I believe was done by an SC sub-contractor as well. I'm trying to find out if this is another SC default due to lack of follow-up, but have no solid information yet. BTW: Before anyone jumps on me, when I said almost 2 years, I meant how long it has been since the alleged investigations started, and it has actually been OVER 2 years. The actual suit was filed 08/10/11. I would hope Jim Harrington would be kind enough to bring us up to date on this suit: Slep-Tone v. Ryan Buckmueller Et Al Case# 2:11-cv-04636-JLL-MAH
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
BruceFan4Life
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:38 pm |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:03 pm Posts: 2674 Location: Jersey Been Liked: 160 times
|
Is Ryan Buckmueller the allged pirate? I've never met a KJ in NJ named Ryan. Maybe he uses a stage name that I would be more familiar with. Where does he work? Could it be the Jimmy Buffet place?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lone Wolf
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:55 am |
|
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:11 am Posts: 1832 Location: TX Been Liked: 59 times
|
He was not the only one that was named in the suit I wonder if anything else has been done on this case. GEZZZZ we never get any updates on cases since Chip with his pacer account got banned
_________________ I like everyone when I first meet them. If you don't like me that's not my problem it's YOURS! A stranger is a friend you haven't met yet
|
|
Top |
|
|
BruceFan4Life
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:37 am |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:03 pm Posts: 2674 Location: Jersey Been Liked: 160 times
|
Lone Wolf wrote: He was not the only one that was named in the suit I wonder if anything else has been done on this case. GEZZZZ we never get any updates on cases since Chip with his pacer account got banned and that's just the way THEY like it to be.
|
|
Top |
|
|
timberlea
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:45 am |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm Posts: 4094 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada Been Liked: 309 times
|
Nothing stopping anyone who is interested to get a Pacer account.
_________________ You can be strange but not a stranger
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:57 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: I would hope Jim Harrington would be kind enough to bring us up to date on this suit:
Slep-Tone v. Ryan Buckmueller Et Al Case# 2:11-cv-04636-JLL-MAH That lawsuit was being handled by a firm based in Pennsylvania. That firm was hired by APS & Associates without Slep-Tone's direct involvement. After APS was fired in February, APS apparently told the Pennsylvania firm to dismiss that lawsuit with prejudice--even though a motion to dismiss had been denied and discovery was proceeding. The firm did so without contacting, or apparently attempting to contact, SC. Because the lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice, there is very little if anything SC can do about it--except sue APS, which it has now done. Of course, a dismissal with prejudice would not cover any activity that occurred after the filing date of the lawsuit, so when we return to NJ, we will target new investigations appropriately.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:51 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
timberlea wrote: Nothing stopping anyone who is interested to get a Pacer account. Yep anyone can get a pacer account if you wish!
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
rickgood
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:49 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:09 pm Posts: 839 Location: Myrtle Beach, SC Been Liked: 224 times
|
How did SC hook up with the most incompetent company in America? Did nobody check their frickin references?
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 4:06 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: I would hope Jim Harrington would be kind enough to bring us up to date on this suit:
Slep-Tone v. Ryan Buckmueller Et Al Case# 2:11-cv-04636-JLL-MAH That lawsuit was being handled by a firm based in Pennsylvania. That firm was hired by APS & Associates without Slep-Tone's direct involvement. After APS was fired in February, APS apparently told the Pennsylvania firm to dismiss that lawsuit with prejudice--even though a motion to dismiss had been denied and discovery was proceeding. The firm did so without contacting, or apparently attempting to contact, SC. Because the lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice, there is very little if anything SC can do about it--except sue APS, which it has now done. Of course, a dismissal with prejudice would not cover any activity that occurred after the filing date of the lawsuit, so when we return to NJ, we will target new investigations appropriately. Yes James when you return, when you get back to fighting the good fight. When will that be? I thought you were going to appeal the the settlements in the Panama City Florida cases? I thought you were going to refile the dismissed cases in Las Vegas, that Donna Boris muffed, oh and by the way you handled at the end, didn't you? What are you going to do about the 40 dismissed cases in California are you going to refile them? What about the possible 31 counter suits that can be filed because of breach of contract concerning the California settlements? I say 31 since one defendant has already counter sued you. You may have sued APS and Donna but is it not true, they both could counter-sue you? The New Year has begun, you were supposed to be pressing the war against piracy on 5 fronts. Isn't closer to the truth that you and Kurt will be playing so much defense that you won't have much time for an offense? Have a nice day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 12:19 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: I would hope Jim Harrington would be kind enough to bring us up to date on this suit:
Slep-Tone v. Ryan Buckmueller Et Al Case# 2:11-cv-04636-JLL-MAH That lawsuit was being handled by a firm based in Pennsylvania. That firm was hired by APS & Associates without Slep-Tone's direct involvement. After APS was fired in February, APS apparently told the Pennsylvania firm to dismiss that lawsuit with prejudice--even though a motion to dismiss had been denied and discovery was proceeding. The firm did so without contacting, or apparently attempting to contact, SC. Because the lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice, there is very little if anything SC can do about it--except sue APS, which it has now done. Of course, a dismissal with prejudice would not cover any activity that occurred after the filing date of the lawsuit, so when we return to NJ, we will target new investigations appropriately. Thanks for the update, Jim. No, Ryan wasn't the track thief, but it doesn't matter now... Jim, if or when you return to NJ, it may be a good idea to acquaint yourself fully with our system and the way our courts deal with business suits ( no pun intended ). if you haven't done so already. Even the artist organizations tred a little more lightly here... No knock, just saying that the environment is not the same as, say, Florida.....
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 15 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 166 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|