|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
kjathena
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 12:12 pm |
|
|
Super Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm Posts: 1636 Been Liked: 73 times
|
LIKE
_________________ "Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain." Unknown "if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters." Lee McGuffey
|
|
Top |
|
|
birdofsong
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:54 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:25 am Posts: 965 Been Liked: 118 times
|
Thunder wrote: birdofsong wrote: I wonder why it is that the cheerleaders are wasting so much time talking abou cheating audits. Very strange to me.
Birdofsong MMMMMMMMMMMMMM that is interesting isn't it? Could it possibly be because some have already been caught trying to cheat the audits? Could it be because a group of KJs decided to get together and pool their disc to go through an audit and got busted trying? Could it be that some have run out after being served and bought up huge amounts of disc to CYA only to find out it wouldn't fly. Could it be that some pirates showed up for an audit with a brand new hard drive and 1/4 of the songs they had when they were investigated? That still doesn't explain why you would hypothesize what potential techniques could or couldn't fly to cheat. It just seems like a pointless conversation for honest people to have. Birdofsong
_________________ Birdofsong
|
|
Top |
|
|
Thunder
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:14 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am Posts: 1066 Location: Madison VA Been Liked: 0 time
|
birdofsong wrote: Thunder wrote: birdofsong wrote: I wonder why it is that the cheerleaders are wasting so much time talking abou cheating audits. Very strange to me.
Birdofsong MMMMMMMMMMMMMM that is interesting isn't it? Could it possibly be because some have already been caught trying to cheat the audits? Could it be because a group of KJs decided to get together and pool their disc to go through an audit and got busted trying? Could it be that some have run out after being served and bought up huge amounts of disc to CYA only to find out it wouldn't fly. Could it be that some pirates showed up for an audit with a brand new hard drive and 1/4 of the songs they had when they were investigated? That still doesn't explain why you would hypothesize what potential techniques could or couldn't fly to cheat. It just seems like a pointless conversation for honest people to have. Birdofsong Well, you are the one who says it was hypothesized, on the other hand I haven't seen a peep on the boards from those who were involved! Funny how all that rhetoric suddenly goes silent isn't it? Haven't seen any of the "my attorney is filing a damage claim" or "I will see them in court" and other such nonsense claims, from those who were filed against lately. Makes me wonder why
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:20 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
guess it depends on which side of the fence you are on. cheerleader side) people trying to figure out the ways it could be cheated to head it off with the manus and keep the thieves accountable.
non cheerleader side) trying to figure out how it can be cheated to show the faults in the manus process.
then again.......depending on which information manus use and follow up on, both sides could get their desired results.
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:24 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
Thunder wrote: Well, you are the one who says it was hypothesized, on the other hand I haven't seen a peep on the boards from those who were involved! What a huge troll Thunder...Of course it was hypothesized BY YOU... how many times did you say the word "COULD?" Thunder wrote: Could it possibly be because ... Could it be because .... Could it be that .... Could it be that ... This is YOU making the hypothesis here.... Birdofsong simply pointed that out.... and you're trying to spin it on her? Give me a break.... Thunder wrote: Funny how all that rhetoric suddenly goes silent isn't it? Haven't seen any of the "my attorney is filing a damage claim" or "I will see them in court" and other such nonsense claims, from those who were filed against lately. Makes me wonder why Rhetoric from WHO?.... name who suddenly went silent.... Was it LoneAvenger?, Skid Rowe, Jennifer Price?.... who? There has to be rhetoric first in order for it to go silent so where did it come from? (other than you) However I have seen some "voluntary dismissal WITH prejudice" going on with no explanation... Hypothesize on that one for a while... I've seen some talk of price fixing as well and of cheating the audits.... but that of course is coming only from the "certified, legal, legit, vetted and authorized" cheerleaders....
|
|
Top |
|
|
Thunder
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:31 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am Posts: 1066 Location: Madison VA Been Liked: 0 time
|
c. staley wrote: Thunder wrote: Well, you are the one who says it was hypothesized, on the other hand I haven't seen a peep on the boards from those who were involved! What a huge troll Thunder...Of course it was hypothesized BY YOU... how many times did you say the word "COULD?" Thunder wrote: Could it possibly be because ... Could it be because .... Could it be that .... Could it be that ... Thunder wrote: Funny how all that rhetoric suddenly goes silent isn't it? Haven't seen any of the "my attorney is filing a damage claim" or "I will see them in court" and other such nonsense claims, from those who were filed against lately. Makes me wonder why Rhetoric from WHO?.... There has to be rhetoric in order for it to go silent doesn't it? However I have seen some "voluntary dismissal WITH prejudice" going on with no explaination... Hypothesize on that one for a while... I guess it would help you to look up hypothesis to fully understand what it is! There is no rhetoric once it goes silent, so those that were putting it forward have ceased the rhetoric. Personally, I don't think you are very high up on the totem pole for the manus to give you an explaination. And it isn't my place to ask them for you, but there can be any one of many reasons for it.
|
|
Top |
|
|
earthling12357
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 5:39 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm Posts: 1609 Location: Earth Been Liked: 307 times
|
Thunder wrote: exweedfarmer wrote: Oh Sh**, there's about a gozillion ways to cheat an audit. It's binary information after all and that can be pushed, pulled, encrypted, compressed, into just about any form you like. Then, use a kiosk not books. Good luck to anyone trying to figure your encryption scheme out. I think you are missing the point of doing an audit to avoid a lawsuit! Don't do the audit go forward with the lawsuit, have your stuff encrypted during discovery and lose by default, have a song not on the system that the investigator sang and once again you are still probably in default. Every song in my entire library is encrypted on my hard drive and has been from the time I ripped them. The reason for this is so they would be useless if someone stole them from me. So my efforts to keep my library from being pirated are going to cause me to lose by default? That doesn't seem right at all.
_________________ KNOW THYSELF
|
|
Top |
|
|
Thunder
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:07 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am Posts: 1066 Location: Madison VA Been Liked: 0 time
|
earthling12357 wrote: Thunder wrote: exweedfarmer wrote: Oh Sh**, there's about a gozillion ways to cheat an audit. It's binary information after all and that can be pushed, pulled, encrypted, compressed, into just about any form you like. Then, use a kiosk not books. Good luck to anyone trying to figure your encryption scheme out. I think you are missing the point of doing an audit to avoid a lawsuit! Don't do the audit go forward with the lawsuit, have your stuff encrypted during discovery and lose by default, have a song not on the system that the investigator sang and once again you are still probably in default. Every song in my entire library is encrypted on my hard drive and has been from the time I ripped them. The reason for this is so they would be useless if someone stole them from me. So my efforts to keep my library from being pirated are going to cause me to lose by default? That doesn't seem right at all. Only if you don't allow access during discovery! BTW what player are you using that will play encrypted files?
|
|
Top |
|
|
MtnKaraoke
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:50 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:40 pm Posts: 1052 Images: 1 Been Liked: 204 times
|
Yeah, I was confused for a second there too... encrypted DURING discovery, meaning after you've been named and not dropped from the lawsuit you encrypted the files to prohibit investigation.
And I have to ask as well... what form of encryption allows a karaoke player to access encrypted files?
_________________ Never the same show twice!
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:25 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
Thunder wrote: While some people think that neither SC nor CB do any investigating would it really suprise anyone to find out that they actually do a very intensive investigation?
For those that still think this is BS please keep thinking that.
Thanks, don't mind if I do....
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:28 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
Thunder wrote: exweedfarmer wrote: Oh Sh**, there's about a gozillion ways to cheat an audit. It's binary information after all and that can be pushed, pulled, encrypted, compressed, into just about any form you like. Then, use a kiosk not books. Good luck to anyone trying to figure your encryption scheme out. I think you are missing the point of doing an audit to avoid a lawsuit! Don't do the audit go forward with the lawsuit, have your stuff encrypted during discovery and lose by default, have a song not on the system that the investigator sang and once again you are still probably in default. I think you are missing the point. SC will never go forward ( into court ) with a lawsuit, so the rest is noise, air, and coercion....
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 11:30 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
Thunder wrote: I guess it would help you to look up hypothesis to fully understand what it is! Apparently, you are confused as to it's meaning: Quote: 1. a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts. 2. a proposition assumed as a premise in an argument. So when you say, "Could it be this" 3 or four times followed by your conjecture, YOU are the one forming a hypothesis.... is this too difficult to comprehend for you? Apparently so. Thunder wrote: There is no rhetoric once it goes silent, so those that were putting it forward have ceased the rhetoric. Who is "those that were?" The question to YOU was "WHO is putting forth this rhetoric that has suddenly gone silent? You can't name a single person because there aren't any. Again you attempt to deflect the original question or ignore it because your statement are (as usual) baseless. Thunder wrote: Personally, I don't think you are very high up on the totem pole for the manus to give you an explaination. And it isn't my place to ask them for you, but there can be any one of many reasons for it. I wasn't addressing or questioning any manufacturer, I was addressing YOU.... but you can't answer any direct questions because you haven't a clue what you are talking about. So the easiest thing for you to do is simply push the responsibility off to someone else. Man up Thunder and stop playing these little schoolyard games.
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 11:44 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
MtnKaraoke wrote: Yeah, I was confused for a second there too... encrypted DURING discovery, meaning after you've been named and not dropped from the lawsuit you encrypted the files to prohibit investigation.
And I have to ask as well... what form of encryption allows a karaoke player to access encrypted files? Boatloads. There are plenty of TSR's (terminate-and-stay-resident programs) to handle such encryption. The user has no idea that they are running.... encrypting and decrypting data as it is shuffled and streamed through various data busses. They are transparent to your karaoke hosting program. The best are written in assembler. Think of these programs as "software dongles" that do take away some resources to run, but not so much as to be noticable. These TSR's can also be "locked" to operate only on a single computer (and not by looking at a NIC card ID or processor ID) - and a similar (sort of) scheme was offered to manufacturers (including SC) almost 10 years ago and they refused, opting instead to simply place a data track ahead of the cdg tracks to foil CDRwin and later to use Media Cloq on discs... and we all know where that went and how effective it has been.
Last edited by c. staley on Thu Apr 28, 2011 11:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
MtnKaraoke
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 11:47 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:40 pm Posts: 1052 Images: 1 Been Liked: 204 times
|
who offered it?
any idea why the mfr's opted not to go that route?
_________________ Never the same show twice!
|
|
Top |
|
|
earthling12357
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:42 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm Posts: 1609 Location: Earth Been Liked: 307 times
|
Thunder wrote: BTW what player are you using that will play encrypted files?
I use DigitalKJ and the built-in ripper encrypts everything automatically while ripping and decrypts it on playback.
_________________ KNOW THYSELF
|
|
Top |
|
|
Thunder
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:31 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am Posts: 1066 Location: Madison VA Been Liked: 0 time
|
Now you are being a tool..........
I downloaded and spent most of the day trying out the Digital KJ and it's ripper.
You are right it encrypts everything perfectly, so well in fact that those encrypted files play on Siglos, Sax & Dotty, and Karma just as any other un-encrypted file will play on all of them.
Just a question though, with all the available players out today why in the world would you pick Digital KJ to work with?
|
|
Top |
|
|
earthling12357
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 6:51 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm Posts: 1609 Location: Earth Been Liked: 307 times
|
Thunder wrote: Now you are being a tool..........
I downloaded and spent most of the day trying out the Digital KJ and it's ripper.
You are right it encrypts everything perfectly, so well in fact that those encrypted files play on Siglos, Sax & Dotty, and Karma just as any other un-encrypted file will play on all of them. I tested DigitalKJ thoroghly before going with it. The purpose of encrypting is so the file will be useless on any other computer or any other license of DigitalKJ. I came across the same thing in testing and asked the same thing! Then I found that winamp could only play the encrypted files if the DigitalKJ plug-ins were still loaded and only on the same computer that my DigitalKJ license resides. But If I close DigitalKJ and try another player it wouldn't play the encrypted file because the DigitalKJ plug-in was no longer active (aparently they wrote their own plug-in for winamp to achieve this). That qwerk doesn't bother me though because I just want to know it won't play on any other computer but mine. If you move that file to another computer or uninstall your DigitalKJ you'll find that file will be useless.
_________________ KNOW THYSELF
|
|
Top |
|
|
Thunder
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:05 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am Posts: 1066 Location: Madison VA Been Liked: 0 time
|
earthling12357 wrote: Thunder wrote: Now you are being a tool..........
I downloaded and spent most of the day trying out the Digital KJ and it's ripper.
You are right it encrypts everything perfectly, so well in fact that those encrypted files play on Siglos, Sax & Dotty, and Karma just as any other un-encrypted file will play on all of them. I tested DigitalKJ thoroghly before going with it. The purpose of encrypting is so the file will be useless on any other computer or any other license of DigitalKJ. I came across the same thing in testing and asked the same thing! Then I found that winamp could only play the encrypted files if the DigitalKJ plug-ins were still loaded and only on the same computer that my DigitalKJ license resides. But If I close DigitalKJ and try another player it wouldn't play the encrypted file because the DigitalKJ plug-in was no longer active (aparently they wrote their own plug-in for winamp to achieve this). That qwerk doesn't bother me though because I just want to know it won't play on any other computer but mine. If you move that file to another computer or uninstall your DigitalKJ you'll find that file will be useless. Karma does not use a winamp base but the files still work regardless, and Digital KJ is not running, although it is still loaded!
|
|
Top |
|
|
earthling12357
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:54 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm Posts: 1609 Location: Earth Been Liked: 307 times
|
Make sure you are using the actual file created by DigitalKJ and try it on a different computer.
_________________ KNOW THYSELF
|
|
Top |
|
|
earthling12357
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:02 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm Posts: 1609 Location: Earth Been Liked: 307 times
|
Thunder wrote: Just a question though, with all the available players out today why in the world would you pick Digital KJ to work with? I went with DigitalKJ because I was at a show years ago where the KJ was using it and I was impressed by the things he was doing with it. He was doing things with his audience screen I had never seen, a morphing scroll announcing upcoming singers, background visualizations, a dancing scooby doo and more. When I asked him about it he showed me the singer repertoire, the history reporting, the contest manager, and the rotation management. I was floored by it. Some of these features are old-hat these days, but back then I knew of no one that offered anything like it. I had to have it because I knew my show would be like nobody else's. And since then, when a DJ or KJ pops into my show for the first time I usually get the same response from them.
_________________ KNOW THYSELF
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 207 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|