KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - Sound Choice at it again in Florida. Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


wordpress-hosting

Offsite Links


It is currently Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:35 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 255 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 13  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 2:42 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:40 pm
Posts: 1052
Images: 1
Been Liked: 204 times
c. staley wrote:
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
it kinda depends on the wording used. if they say "only certified hosts" then its gonna be a problem, if it says "hosts that use original discs or certified PC hosts" then no issue. does anybody have a settlement agreement to see?


I have original discs.... I am therefore just as "certified" as anyone else.


I agree.

If a venue asks you if you have original discs, what do you tell them?

If a venue asks to see your discs to verify your statement before hiring you, what do you do?

If a "competitor" approaches one of your venues and offers to do a show with 120,000 tracks, how do you respond to that?

Specifically, how do you communicate with your venue to differentiate the fact that owning original discs is required to be considered legit and/or certified?

It isn't about being innocent or guilty, it is about meeting a requirement to be legit.

To call yourself a karaoke provider/KJ/host and make money from that activity you must meet the minimum requirement of legal possession of licensed, manufacturers' product.

Wouldn't you agree?

_________________
Never the same show twice!


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 3:57 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
it kinda depends on the wording used. if they say "only certified hosts" then its gonna be a problem, if it says "hosts that use original discs or certified PC hosts" then no issue. does anybody have a settlement agreement to see?


I'd like to see that too.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:00 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
c. staley wrote:
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
it kinda depends on the wording used. if they say "only certified hosts" then its gonna be a problem, if it says "hosts that use original discs or certified PC hosts" then no issue. does anybody have a settlement agreement to see?


I have original discs.... I am therefore just as "certified" as anyone else.


Not based on this discussion... unless you are planning to go back to the old ways and use your discs instead of your computer.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:06 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am
Posts: 1066
Location: Madison VA
Been Liked: 0 time
cueball wrote:
c. staley wrote:
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
it kinda depends on the wording used. if they say "only certified hosts" then its gonna be a problem, if it says "hosts that use original discs or certified PC hosts" then no issue. does anybody have a settlement agreement to see?


I have original discs.... I am therefore just as "certified" as anyone else.


Not based on this discussion... unless you are planning to go back to the old ways and use your discs instead of your computer.



Steven,

Paradigm is already a "certified" meaning their company has already shown that they have the origional disc in 1:1 relationship to what is on their hard drive, and this was certified by the manus.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:26 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
MtnKaraoke wrote:
c. staley wrote:
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
it kinda depends on the wording used. if they say "only certified hosts" then its gonna be a problem, if it says "hosts that use original discs or certified PC hosts" then no issue. does anybody have a settlement agreement to see?


I have original discs.... I am therefore just as "certified" as anyone else.


I agree.

If a venue asks you if you have original discs, what do you tell them?


I do, why do you ask?

MtnKaraoke wrote:
If a venue asks to see your discs to verify your statement before hiring you, what do you do?


Again, I would ask them why.



MtnKaraoke wrote:
If a "competitor" approaches one of your venues and offers to do a show with 120,000 tracks, how do you respond to that?


There is no response. It's entirely up to the venue isn't it? They are free to fire and hire whomever they like. I am not their business partner. If they feel someone else can do a better job and make them more money, it's well within their right to do so. Any show I do is not dependent on any specific library "size" or even brand.. If your show is based on your library or equipment then then I can understand how someone with a bigger library would make you feel threatened.

MtnKaraoke wrote:
Specifically, how do you communicate with your venue to differentiate the fact that owning original discs is required to be considered legit and/or certified?


I don't. Because I don't consider SC's labels to be any type of legal credential at all whether you use the label "certified", "legit", "vetted", "legal" or anything else. Bar owners don't want to get involved in the karaoke "business" per se. They want someone in to do it and if it's too much of a legal hot potato, they'll simply leave it alone. This is what you haven't figured out yet.

MtnKaraoke wrote:
It isn't about being innocent or guilty, it is about meeting a requirement to be legit.


You're right. It's not about innocent or guilty. But it's also not about meeting ANY VENDOR's "requirement" to be anything. You are attempting to make a couple of companys who have been SUED (and lost) for intellectual property THEFT (read as "piracy") in the millions like they are suddenly some kind of squeaky clean "authority." You might swallow that willingly, but I won't.

MtnKaraoke wrote:
To call yourself a karaoke provider/KJ/host and make money from that activity you must meet the minimum requirement of legal possession of licensed, manufacturers' product.

Wouldn't you agree?


To call yourself a karaoke manufacturer/provider and make MILLIONS from that activity you must meet the minimum requirement of legally acquiring ALL valid licensing for the intellectual products BEFORE you resell and mark them as "Used by permission." Anything less would be fraud.

Wouldn't you agree?


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 5:29 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:40 pm
Posts: 1052
Images: 1
Been Liked: 204 times
c. staley wrote:
MtnKaraoke wrote:
c. staley wrote:
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
it kinda depends on the wording used. if they say "only certified hosts" then its gonna be a problem, if it says "hosts that use original discs or certified PC hosts" then no issue. does anybody have a settlement agreement to see?


I have original discs.... I am therefore just as "certified" as anyone else.


I agree.

If a venue asks you if you have original discs, what do you tell them?


I do, why do you ask?
I ask because I don't want to support an operator who stole their music.

MtnKaraoke wrote:
If a venue asks to see your discs to verify your statement before hiring you, what do you do?


Again, I would ask them why.
And they would tell you that it is your ownership of said discs that insulates them from the risk associated with stolen music.



MtnKaraoke wrote:
If a "competitor" approaches one of your venues and offers to do a show with 120,000 tracks, how do you respond to that?


There is no response. It's entirely up to the venue isn't it? They are free to fire and hire whomever they like. I am not their business partner. If they feel someone else can do a better job and make them more money, it's well within their right to do so. Any show I do is not dependent on any specific library "size" or even brand.. If your show is based on your library or equipment then then I can understand how someone with a bigger library would make you feel threatened.
Chip, please refrain from this obvious baiting, I did not insult you or your intelligence nor accuse you of anything. I never suggested that anything was dependent on library size, what I was referring to was specifically expressed in the next paragraph. What I was actually saying...

MtnKaraoke wrote:
Specifically, how do you communicate with your venue to differentiate the fact that owning original discs is required to be considered legit and/or certified?


When I say required, I mean by US not THEM. I mean that for anyone who is in this business to make a living and owns/purchased all of their music to recognize another as legitimate, wouldn't you agree that that should be the baseline requirement?


I don't. Because I don't consider SC's labels to be any type of legal credential at all whether you use the label "certified", "legit", "vetted", "legal" or anything else. Bar owners don't want to get involved in the karaoke "business" per se. They want someone in to do it and if it's too much of a legal hot potato, they'll simply leave it alone. This is what you haven't figured out yet.
What you haven't figured out yet is that I don't care how you feel about SC. I also have experienced quite the opposite when I've discussed karaoke with bar owners. They are concerned with the legality because karaoke is either already making them money or has the potential to make them money. It just doesn't make business sense to make decisions because you're in fear.


MtnKaraoke wrote:
It isn't about being innocent or guilty, it is about meeting a requirement to be legit.


You're right. It's not about innocent or guilty. But it's also not about meeting ANY VENDOR's "requirement" to be anything. You are attempting to make a couple of companys who have been SUED (and lost) for intellectual property THEFT (read as "piracy") in the millions like they are suddenly some kind of squeaky clean "authority." You might swallow that willingly, but I won't.

I did not say ANY VENDOR's requirement. I am not conferring any authority, you however can't seem to stop chewing on that bone. I never said anything about squeaky clean, no attempt on my part whatsoever. The activities and resultant litigation and resolution that you constantly refer to not relative to the KJ's responsibility. Right now, the entire industry is trying to right itself and continue forward while you continually dissent without any constructive or problem solving intent.


MtnKaraoke wrote:
To call yourself a karaoke provider/KJ/host and make money from that activity you must meet the minimum requirement of legal possession of licensed, manufacturers' product.

Wouldn't you agree?


To call yourself a karaoke manufacturer/provider and make MILLIONS from that activity you must meet the minimum requirement of legally acquiring ALL valid licensing for the intellectual products BEFORE you resell and mark them as "Used by permission." Anything less would be fraud.

Wouldn't you agree?
Yes. I would (if I were damaged by this activity) take them to court and recover said damages if I was successful. But wait... isn't that what happened? Isn't that over? Time served? Restitution paid? Agreements made? Get over it, its old news.

Like I said before... I'm not altogether on-board with the ideas that the mfrs should be involved in certifying KJ's.
Right now, they are the only one's with the time, money and organization in place to do so. I took action to preempt any problems with these mfrs. I do believe that some sort of standard or minimum requirements should be met. I'm still trying to figure that one out and you aren't really helping.

_________________
Never the same show twice!


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:00 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am
Posts: 1066
Location: Madison VA
Been Liked: 0 time
Sandman,

Your forehead is bloody! Please stop before you knock yourself out over nothing! :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 8:07 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster

Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Posts: 1636
Been Liked: 73 times
anyone disc based can have the venues do an audit themself..disc by disc to insure they will not have a problem (not sure how many will take the time for a large library (just seeing a van load of cases wont work)...then cert is un-needed.........Trivia will never replace Karaoke here...its been tried and failed a horrible death

_________________
"Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain."
Unknown
"if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters."
Lee McGuffey


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 8:27 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
That's all that is being said here. Can on operator that just runs discs only - no computer, be certified as well. Why is it limited to computer operators - or is it that disc users just haven't done so yet.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 9:23 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
i think being disc based counts just the same as 1:1. i also think showing those discs so they can be seen as originals, just like the PC hosts do, is fair as well. i, as a PC host, can make fake discs just as easy as a disc based host could. it is all about every song i offer to my customers is backed up by an original manu disc. every song Joe for instance offers his customers is backed up by an original manu disc, no burns, just like mine. so same cert should be given if the same audit is done.

Chip, am i reading your response right? if a venue owner wanted to be sure he only hired people with legitimately purchased libraries, you would play hard to get and basically make him just take your word for it? why not show him?

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 9:51 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am
Posts: 1066
Location: Madison VA
Been Liked: 0 time
Certificates are given to those who are disc based and go through the audit, we had two in Charlotte that were disc based I believe.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:13 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am
Posts: 1066
Location: Madison VA
Been Liked: 0 time
kjathena wrote:
anyone disc based can have the venues do an audit themself..disc by disc to insure they will not have a problem (not sure how many will take the time for a large library (just seeing a van load of cases wont work)...then cert is un-needed.........Trivia will never replace Karaoke here...its been tried and failed a horrible death



Trivia has been tried every where, it works for a couple of months and then drops off to nothing!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:30 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:40 pm
Posts: 1052
Images: 1
Been Liked: 204 times
Ha!

Trivia is the 2nd most successful night at my longest running venue.

2nd to karaoke that is.

_________________
Never the same show twice!


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:50 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
KaraokeJerry wrote:
I'm not trying to court trouble so I've stayed off the boards.
But here is a twist to consider. How could suing the venues affect the disc-based KJ's, like me?
Let's say the venues are herded into agreements to hire only certified KJ's. As I understand it, the certifications are only for computer-based KJ's, the GEM series is only for computer, that does me no good. (And now Chartbuster wants to charge $199 a year to certify?)
I need none of that, I only use manufacturers' CDGs and LaserDiscs, I have them with me every show I do.
But perhaps there comes a day when I can't be hired by a venue because I'm not certified? But that same venue could hire a rehabbed pirate who will still pay only a fraction of what I've got sunk into my collection?

Somebody please, please tell me I'm thinking foolishly.


You're not thinking foolishly at all, Jerry. I'm manufacturer disc based as well, and this has been my bone of contention all along. SC is, as Chip put it so eloquently, "poisoning the well" for everyone, not just pirates. Venues HAVE been easing off karaoke in some areas, simply because they don't want to be bothered, or have waves made for their businesses.

SC, being out of the karaoke production business for some time now, does not have any customer base to worry about, and so couldn't care less about their effect on the Karaoke Hosting business one way or the other.

They have merely found a new source of income generation.

As for "Certifications" by any manufacturer? Unfortunately venues couldn't care less, any more than they care about NAME or or other DJ "certifications". Venues ( and I've been everything from a bartender to a manager to an owner) ONLY care about business running smoothly, and with the least amount of involvement from outsiders as possible.

The worst part is that it's all big noise from a teeny little company with no juice. It's all bark, but it's loud and annoying to vendors.

You won't SC in a courtroom for them any more than you have for KJs.

Remember- They have absolutely NO STAKE in the business of karaoke any longer. They will attempt to coerce as much money as possible until the well runs dry.

Does anyone know if ANY of the listed venues are connected to hotels or other high income businesses, or are the only going after small single owner places with hopes that they won't fight?

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 11:03 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
cueball wrote:

To me, it sounds like KaraokeJerry doesn't want to pay CB that $199 fee. I know that I DON'T!!! Steve, maybe you feel it's worth it to pay that fee (as you have stated in some past posts), but I don't. I am only doing a show at 1 place, and that's only 12 shows a year at this place (due to my schedule and when the bar wants to have karaoke). I get paid $150 for a 3 hour show there. I am Disc Based too (and you know that, because you've seen me tote my library with me years ago... it's grown even more since you last saw me). I'm not shelling out $199 to receive a BS Certificate of Certification from a Manufacturer, when the Venues could care less.
.



Add to that the little business of requiring you to mark your discs soldering iron...... Oh yeah- THAT'S gonna happen.... :lol: :roll:

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 11:06 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
Lonman wrote:
Thunder wrote:
you just tell them you are disc based and legal

If a club is looking for a 'certified' kj off of say the Sound Choice site and only wants a kj that is 'certified', then someone running discs would not fall into that catagory simply because they are running discs. A club wouldn't know the difference.


....And therein lay the problem, boys and girls. You can be SURE SC won't spell it out for them either....

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:43 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
so Joe, were you still a venue owner, would you not care if your host was using a pirated hard drive and just look the other way to stay blissfully ignorant? run the rest of your business with stolen beer from your vendors, jukebox with limewire tracks, have your tv's attached to tapped cable from next door? or follow the rules for all that and say screw it, karaoke doesn't matter that much to care about? that is what it sounds like in your post to Jerry.

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 4:18 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
it kinda depends on the wording used. if they say "only certified hosts" then its gonna be a problem, if it says "hosts that use original discs or certified PC hosts" then no issue. does anybody have a settlement agreement to see?


c. staley wrote:
I have original discs.... I am therefore just as "certified" as anyone else.


cueball wrote:
Not based on this discussion... unless you are planning to go back to the old ways and use your discs instead of your computer.


Thunder wrote:
Steven,

Paradigm is already a "certified" meaning their company has already shown that they have the origional disc in 1:1 relationship to what is on their hard drive, and this was certified by the manus.



Steve... my comment was intended for Chip, not Paradigm.... Read the whole series of quotes in full, not in bits and pieces (where you only read Paradigm's part, and thought I was commenting to that). I am re-quoting everything, but this time I am separating the quotes, so you can read it more clearly.


Last edited by Cueball on Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:48 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 4:30 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
Chip, am i reading your response right? if a venue owner wanted to be sure he only hired people with legitimately purchased libraries, you would play hard to get and basically make him just take your word for it? why not show him?


It's not a matter of "hard to get" at all. My feeling is you (and other cheerleaders) are completely suckered in to SC's game of "legitimately purchased libraries" you can't see the forest for the trees.

"Legit", "certified", "legal", "audited", "inspected", "vetted", whatever words you care to attach to to your business is nothing more than an excuse to try add value to your own inability to make money. Why is it you think that ANY bar owner would care in the first place? Because of the marketing of FEAR through "rumors of lawsuits by SC?" You are cheerleading for the company that is promoting fear to the very venues you want to make your customers. The same company that claims you should be "legit", "certified", "legal", "audited", "inspected", "vetted" when they have no legal authority to impose this on anyone in the first place.

How about I ask the bar owner to "audit" all of the tap equipment, kitchen area, tax receipts and liquor license because I want to make sure that THEY are safe for consumers like me and "legal?" How far will that go? It won't because I don't have any right to make any of those assessments do I? Nope. Just as SC has no right to claim that an "audit is required to be legal."

If SC wants to sue pirates then let 'em at it... let 'em gather real EVIDENCE and sue them until the cows come home - I don't care. You have been suckered by SC and CB to be their "salespeople" but you don't see that. You think they're doing something to "help you" when in fact, you are doing more to only help them sell THEIR product to the very pirates in your neck of the woods at a financed, deep discount price. If they are so "right" in what they are doing, why hasn't a single court case from 2009 that are still on the books not completed? Ever bother to ask yourself that or are you simply ignoring it altogether? Don't blame it on the "wheels of justice" because from what I've seen, the standstill is not caused by the courts.

You bought or otherwise own your discs right?
What else is necessary for you to operate your business?
    Is it a requirement that you be "audited" by a vendor you've already paid to be in business?
    Is it a requirement that you be "certified" by a vendor you've already paid to be in business?
    Is it a requirement that you be "vetted" by a vendor you've already paid to be in business?
    Is it a requirement that you be "anything" by a vendor you've already paid to be in business?

You see, the penalty for purchasing and or using SC and CB products is a lawsuit.

How about if someone sends a letter to your venues stating that they are "officially notifying the club that they think that you might be an infringer" with a stern warning that you should be fired immediately and send along with it, a copy of the latest filing against venues in Florida from SC?

This way, they would not be accusing you of anything other than stating that "they think" or "are lead to believe." The club doesn't need evidence of anything more than the legal hassle they might have if they continue to keep you. They'd tell you; "buh-bye!"

Stand on your own two feet and stop blaming others (like pirates) for your problems or hoping that others (like SC) will make it all better for you. The common denominator here is that you're not doing anything for yourself in either situation.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:00 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm
Posts: 4094
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Been Liked: 309 times
I wonder what Chip would do if we ripped off his kiosks and made copies and started selling them for pennies on the dollar? Mmmmm, methinks he would do what the karaoke manufacturers are doing. Suing violators. But we are just making copies for our show, so that should be okay. Buy one and make copies for our own use. Why buy 4-5 kiosks when one will do. Why buy from Chip when Joe Blow has the same thing at a fraction of the cost.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 255 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 13  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech