|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
PyrateSilly
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:55 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:46 pm Posts: 107 Been Liked: 11 times
|
They are about ready to stop and check "suspisious" people now in AZ. So guess we are not too far from that.
|
|
Top |
|
|
tovmod
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:20 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:36 pm Posts: 613 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Manobeer @ Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:16 pm wrote: Just because I am legal, does not mean I would "like" an IRS audit. Just because I am sober, does not mean I would "love" to be pulled over and asked to take field sobriety tests. Just because I am healthy does not mean I would "like" a hernia exam.
If I the customer can find other companies that dont subject their customers to lawsuits and "audits"... Why would you object to me choosing those other companies?
In some cases we do not have a choice, but when it comes to purchasing Karaoke discs we still do.
I admit that I think SC tracks are great, but to ME... it is not currently worth the possible "inconvenience".
That pretty much sums it up for me!
|
|
Top |
|
|
tovmod
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:45 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:36 pm Posts: 613 Been Liked: 0 time
|
JoeChartreuse @ Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:04 pm wrote: Wall Of Sound @ Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:34 am wrote: Joe,
Instead of posting your spin on what Kurt is talking about, could you kindly link to the posts that Kurt has made so people can see EXACTLY what he says? Wall, AKA InsaneKJ - previously booted from this forum for trolling- My statement, as you KNOW, was from info given on another forum where you troll. diafel PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:29 am wrote: Wall Of Sound @ Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:51 pm wrote wrote: I would normally post links to back up these claims but I'm not sure this forum would allow links to another forum. If the mods will allow it, they can PM me....
WOS, you're an idiot.
I guess there are several people who see the fallacy with your thinking and the provocative nature of your posts. I imagine that it is out of sheer frustration with you that some have resorted to personally attacking you?
You can't seem to understand a simple fact: Honest people don't necessarily act like sheep as you have stated you are willing to behave if accused by SC. And honest people don't take lightly to having their time intruded upon, or being falsely accused (by a supplier), or having their businesses practices incorrectly impugned and their business' name maligned.
I make most of my real money doings Weddings, Bar Mitzvahs, Quinceaneras and similar private parties, events having nothing to do with karaoke. If someone googles my name, I would derive no benefit from having a frivolous and unfounded lawsuit show up in association with my name!
You don't have to agree with those who have problems with SC , but you DO HAVE to respect those who don't buy into your "if you have nothing to hide" crap!
|
|
Top |
|
|
diafel
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:57 am |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:27 am Posts: 2444 Been Liked: 46 times
|
tovmod @ Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:45 am wrote: You don't have to agree with those who have problems with SC , but you DO HAVE to respect those who don't buy into your "if you have nothing to hide" crap!
Thank you. That was very well said.
|
|
Top |
|
|
leopard lizard
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:32 am |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm Posts: 2593 Been Liked: 294 times
|
By that same token, there is no shortage of people calling those who disagree with THEIR pont of view schills, not capable of thinking for themselves or labelling their opinions as "c--p." I don't agree with it coming from either direction.
|
|
Top |
|
|
jerry12x
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 10:00 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:40 am Posts: 2289 Location: Bolton UK Been Liked: 3 times
|
leopard lizard @ Fri Jun 18, 2010 5:32 pm wrote: I don't agree with it coming from either direction.
OMG Someone that thinks for themselves.
Quick... Do a Stepford Wives on her.
|
|
Top |
|
|
tovmod
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 12:08 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:36 pm Posts: 613 Been Liked: 0 time
|
leopard lizard @ Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:32 am wrote: By that same token, there is no shortage of people calling those who disagree with THEIR pont of view schills, not capable of thinking for themselves or labelling their opinions as "c--p." I don't agree with it coming from either direction.
NO.... Sorry, it's not "the same token". The phrase "if you have nothing to hide" implies that you DO HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE IF YOU DISAGREE. And if that isn't a clear enough reason for those of us who have had with WOS and the likes, than nothing I can say will make it any clearer!
|
|
Top |
|
|
jerry12x
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 12:31 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:40 am Posts: 2289 Location: Bolton UK Been Liked: 3 times
|
tovmod @ Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:08 pm wrote: leopard lizard @ Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:32 am wrote: By that same token, there is no shortage of people calling those who disagree with THEIR pont of view schills, not capable of thinking for themselves or labelling their opinions as "c--p." I don't agree with it coming from either direction. NO.... Sorry, it's not "the same token". The phrase "if you have nothing to hide" implies that you DO HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE IF YOU DISAGREE. And if that isn't a clear enough reason for those of us who have had with WOS and the likes, than nothing I can say will make it any clearer!
Hmmm.
Your inference does not make the above statement inaccurate though.
Does it.
|
|
Top |
|
|
jerry12x
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 1:54 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:40 am Posts: 2289 Location: Bolton UK Been Liked: 3 times
|
tovmod @ Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:08 pm wrote: The phrase "if you have nothing to hide" implies that you DO HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE IF YOU DISAGREE. And if that isn't a clear enough reason for those of us who have had with WOS and the likes, than nothing I can say will make it any clearer!
"if you have nothing to hide" implies that you DO HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE IF YOU DISAGREE.
Maybe it's a culture thing.
Over here if you have nothing to hide often means
you have nothing to worry about.
Shows how different areas translate things.
|
|
Top |
|
|
leopard lizard
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:05 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm Posts: 2593 Been Liked: 294 times
|
The intent of my post was to say that there has been name calling, innuendo and disrespect of other's opinions coming from ALL sides and we probably aren't advancing the argument when we do that.
|
|
Top |
|
|
tovmod
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:14 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:36 pm Posts: 613 Been Liked: 0 time
|
jerry12x @ Fri Jun 18, 2010 12:31 pm wrote: tovmod @ Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:08 pm wrote: leopard lizard @ Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:32 am wrote: By that same token, there is no shortage of people calling those who disagree with THEIR pont of view schills, not capable of thinking for themselves or labelling their opinions as "c--p." I don't agree with it coming from either direction. NO.... Sorry, it's not "the same token". The phrase "if you have nothing to hide" implies that you DO HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE IF YOU DISAGREE. And if that isn't a clear enough reason for those of us who have had with WOS and the likes, than nothing I can say will make it any clearer! Hmmm. Your inference does not make the above statement inaccurate though. Does it. Yes, it does! It makes it inaccurate in so far as they are not "by the same token" When party #1 suggests he has nothing to hide", he is implying that party #2 does have something to hide ( READ AS: engages in the criminal act of piracy) And when party #2 responds with the suggestion that party #1 can't think for himself, the two accusations are not equivalent in nature. They are not!
And perhaps if the day ever comes that the shills and their ilk stop suggesting that those who disagree with them have something to hide we will have reached the day when the use of personal descriptions in this debate will cease? And again, being subtle about it and using the phrase I have nothing to hide doesn't change the characterization that one person is depicting of another through implication and/or innuendo!
And if those of us who disagree with "those who have nothing to hide" simply stated in response that we have nothing to hide, how would that statement be received? It would be received with the admonition ---- "so, what are you complaining about? Just agree to SC demands (as Athena did) and prove you have nothing to hide"
And then..... here we go again..... back to the top!!!! [b] I have nothing to hide [/b]
|
|
Top |
|
|
leopard lizard
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:26 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm Posts: 2593 Been Liked: 294 times
|
leopard lizard @ Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:05 pm wrote: The intent of my post was to say that there has been name calling, innuendo and disrespect of other's opinions coming from ALL sides and we probably aren't advancing the argument when we do that.
Again.
|
|
Top |
|
|
jerry12x
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:55 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:40 am Posts: 2289 Location: Bolton UK Been Liked: 3 times
|
Tov, you appear a little paranoid.
I am worried that you may be over excited.
Please try and calm down.
You can play with words all night long if you want to
really, you're a big boy and you can do that.
Have you got any brandy. That might help.
I do not feel I have the right to try and tell others what to think.
Do you think that is one of my weaknesses.?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Wall Of Sound
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:19 pm |
|
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:35 am Posts: 691 Location: Carson City, NV Been Liked: 0 time
|
jerry12x @ Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:55 pm wrote: Tov, you appear a little paranoid.
Yeah, I wonder if he has something to hide!
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:27 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
kjathena @ Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:15 pm wrote: "
1) As of today 5 people I KNOW to be pirates have dissappeard from our area.
KJAthena
What Athena didn't mention here but put forth on the other forum is that NONE of the 5 shows that disappeared were named by SC for anything.[b] They are just gone....
Argument with venue owner?
Wasn't bringing in enough to justify being there?
The host sucked and Athena runs a good show?
Found better venue elsewhere?
Retired?
Nothing to do with SC????
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:29 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
Manobeer @ Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:16 pm wrote: I admit that I think SC tracks are great, but to ME... it is not currently worth the possible "inconvenience".
Just good business practice in a nutshell...
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:31 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
birdofsong @ Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:02 pm wrote: It's like saying...give me your money and then, as a bonus, I'll sodomize you later, but I'm not going to tell you that part now. Who the hell would choose that if they were allowed to make an informed choice up front? It's a bait and switch...
I thought I was just purchasing Karaoke discs. It seems, however, now they have come with invisible strings.
No thank you.
birdofsong
Couldn't have said it better myself- and I sure have been trying.....
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
karaoke for food.....
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:14 am |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:27 pm Posts: 265 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Quote: SC "could" come back tru your area years later and want to reverify you are still legal.
hehehe...sound choice will believe you the first time but not the second time around..hilarious. And our poor lonman saved every scrap of paper since moses, that's gotta rain on his parade. People people people.......
_________________ Sweet Little Me In Karaokeland........
|
|
Top |
|
|
tovmod
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:57 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:36 pm Posts: 613 Been Liked: 0 time
|
JoeChartreuse @ Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:27 pm wrote: kjathena @ Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:15 pm wrote: "
1) As of today 5 people I KNOW to be pirates have dissappeard from our area.
KJAthena What Athena didn't mention here but put forth on the other forum is that NONE of the 5 shows that disappeared were named by SC for anything.[b] They are just gone....
Argument with venue owner?
Wasn't bringing in enough to justify being there?
The host sucked and Athena runs a good show?
Found better venue elsewhere?
Retired?
Nothing to do with SC????
Thanks for wondering out loud. I have also wondered about this same since I first ran into this assertion on another forum.
I haven't pressed the matter because I was paranoid that Jerry12x would claim that I was being paranoid. And who can withstand such scrutiny from Jerry12x?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:02 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
karaoke for food..... @ Mon Jun 28, 2010 3:14 am wrote: And our poor lonman saved every scrap of paper since moses, that's gotta rain on his parade.l
No rain here. I didn't save the receipts for anything but tax purposes, but do have every one for every year.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 221 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|