|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Odie
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:59 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:46 pm Posts: 3377 Been Liked: 0 time
|
I don't know who these guys think they are, but they're messin' with my favorite solar system!!! This kind of nonsense has to stop! LOL
"PLUTO GETS THE BOOT! ---------
Pluto no longer a planet, say astronomers.
Thursday, August 24, 2006; Posted: 10:27 a.m. EDT (14:27 GMT)
PRAGUE, Czech Republic (AP) -- Leading astronomers declared Thursday that Pluto is no longer a planet under historic new guidelines that downsize the solar system from nine planets to eight."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Chuck2
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:02 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:35 am Posts: 4179 Location: Grand Prairie, TX Been Liked: 3 times
|
Oh great, now the planets are leaving us too? First it was site members now it's planets?
I am not happy. Did I really say something bad enough for Pluto to be downgraded like that?
Me and my big mouth.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Babs
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:06 am |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 11:37 am Posts: 7979 Location: Suburbs Been Liked: 0 time
|
I remembered talk of this before. So they've made it official now.
don't worry Pluto isn't going anywhere LMAO
It's like the tomato - first we thought it was a vegetable now we find out it is a fruit.
Doesn't matter I still eat them. LMAO
_________________ [shadow=pink][glow=deepskyblue]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
[updown] ~*~ MONKEY BUSINESS KARAOKE~*~ [/shadow][/updown][/glow]
|
|
Top |
|
|
Chuck2
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:07 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:35 am Posts: 4179 Location: Grand Prairie, TX Been Liked: 3 times
|
Oh man, now Pluto is a fruit. Or are tomatoes made of Plutonium?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Babs
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:12 am |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 11:37 am Posts: 7979 Location: Suburbs Been Liked: 0 time
|
Silly the moon is made of cheese, so why not
_________________ [shadow=pink][glow=deepskyblue]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
[updown] ~*~ MONKEY BUSINESS KARAOKE~*~ [/shadow][/updown][/glow]
|
|
Top |
|
|
Chuck2
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:16 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:35 am Posts: 4179 Location: Grand Prairie, TX Been Liked: 3 times
|
I just had lunch but I could go for a grilled moon sammich. As long as it doesn't get tinkled on.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Babs
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:20 am |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 11:37 am Posts: 7979 Location: Suburbs Been Liked: 0 time
|
Yum add a slice of pluto and I'll be right over. LMAO
_________________ [shadow=pink][glow=deepskyblue]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
[updown] ~*~ MONKEY BUSINESS KARAOKE~*~ [/shadow][/updown][/glow]
|
|
Top |
|
|
TopherM
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:42 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 10:09 am Posts: 3341 Location: Tampa Bay, FL Been Liked: 445 times
|
I read an article on this last week. They actually added a 10 planet along with Pluto when they officially made Pluto a planet back in the 1930s. They then realized that the other planet was orbiting the sun in an asteroid belt and should therefore be classified as a very very big astoriod, so they stopped calling it a planet in the 1940s. Same thing this time around with Pluto. Pluto is in a highly eliptical orbit suggestive of an astoroid belt, suggesting that for clarification purposes it is more accurate to call it a really big astoroid than a planet.
This also comes after they have discovered three bodies of mass that are much bigger than Pluto over the last 10 years, but these are also in highly eliptical orbits sugestive of astoroid behavior. The Pluto decision was less about making Pluto NOT a planet as it was defining the word PLANET before we ended up with 25 of them!!
It used to be based solely on an arbitrary mass size. Well, like I said, within the last 10 years they have discovered three bodies of mass larger than Pluto, so should they have been introduced as planets as well?? Instead of doing this, they redefined planet to mean the bodies of mass that are in more circular orbits around the sun, and got rid of the mass component (though, of course, their mass is what makes their orbits more circular!!. So now we have, and by the new definition should ALWAYS have 8 planets (barring a castostrophic event), and that is that!!
But I do want science teachers everywhere to regrade all of their astronomy tests from the past 76 years!! I knew Pluto was a dog, and not a planet!!
_________________ C Mc
KJ, FL
|
|
Top |
|
|
pflugerville
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:38 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 6:04 pm Posts: 1688 Location: wishing i was at wrigley Been Liked: 0 time
|
it's okay that pluto is no longer a planet....i have gained enough weight over the past couple of months that i now have a gravitational feild around my huge body (no uranus jokes!) and i also have a moon! (no black hole jokes either!)
_________________ All work and no play make Homer something something
|
|
Top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:42 pm |
|
|
I knew that Clyde Tombaugh needed glasses--well, so much for amatuer astrologists!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Magz
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:48 pm |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:02 am Posts: 193 Location: Georgia Been Liked: 0 time
|
Hmm I think it all comes down the size. Must have been male scientists whom didn't feel quite adequate in themselves.... so they had to pick on the smallest planet.
_________________ [scroll][glow=darkorchid]~I'm the girl your mother warned you about~[/scroll][/glow]
|
|
Top |
|
|
twansenne
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:24 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:03 pm Posts: 1921 Images: 1 Location: N. Central Iowa Been Liked: 53 times
|
Babs @ Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:06 pm wrote: I remembered talk of this before. So they've made it official now. don't worry Pluto isn't going anywhere LMAO
It's like the tomato - first we thought it was a vegetable now we find out it is a fruit. Doesn't matter I still eat them. LMAO
Acording to the USDA, the tomato is classified a vegtable, although it is technically a fruit. Ya get the best of both worlds, well, unless you live on Pluto.
|
|
Top |
|
|
knightshow
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:31 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 2:40 am Posts: 7468 Location: Kansas City, MO Been Liked: 1 time
|
as far as Pluto is concerned, they've been wanting to declassify that for a long time. I remember in Junior High (what they call MIDDLE SCHOOL nowadays) in the mid seventies the various discussions about what constitutes the idea behind a planet, and that technically, Pluto was really the size of a Planetoid... but they wanted to keep it a planet like a grandfather clause...
The one thing I love about Astronomy is that the more we dig into it, the more we learn. And of course, the better the technology, the more we find out and understand.
|
|
Top |
|
|
MorganLeFey
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:03 pm |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:26 am Posts: 7441 Location: New Zealand Been Liked: 8 times
|
Butterfly2231983 @ Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:48 am wrote: Hmm I think it all comes down the size. Must have been male scientists whom didn't feel quite adequate in themselves.... so they had to pick on the smallest planet.
this occured to me too...redheads think alike
_________________ "Be who you are and say what you feel... Because those that matter... Don't mind...And those that mind... Don't matter."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:07 pm |
|
|
I'm still waiting for them to discover the secret planet of "The Crab People", which we all know is hidden behind the moon and I'm still wholly convinced the planet Mongo is ripe for discovery any day now....
|
|
Top |
|
|
planet_bill
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:12 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:35 am Posts: 854 Location: Cedar Park, Tx Been Liked: 1 time
|
no vocals @ Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:38 pm wrote: it's okay that pluto is no longer a planet....i have gained enough weight over the past couple of months that i now have a gravitational feild around my huge body (no uranus jokes!) and i also have a moon! (no black hole jokes either!)
You seem pretty worried there - no vocals.
Bill
_________________ The Truth Is Out There
|
|
Top |
|
|
planet_bill
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:14 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:35 am Posts: 854 Location: Cedar Park, Tx Been Liked: 1 time
|
michaeljayklein @ Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:07 pm wrote: I'm still waiting for them to discover the secret planet of "The Crab People", which we all know is hidden behind the moon and I'm still wholly convinced the planet Mongo is ripe for discovery any day now....
Man, I love eating crab. If there is a secret planet of crab people, I'm going to show up with my butter, and lemon and conquer!!!
Bill
_________________ The Truth Is Out There
|
|
Top |
|
|
planet_bill
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:15 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:35 am Posts: 854 Location: Cedar Park, Tx Been Liked: 1 time
|
I don't care what these "scientists" say. I say there are 9 planets and Pluto is one of them, and that's the way it's going to remain.
_________________ The Truth Is Out There
|
|
Top |
|
|
TopherM
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:58 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 10:09 am Posts: 3341 Location: Tampa Bay, FL Been Liked: 445 times
|
planet_bill @ Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:15 pm wrote: I don't care what these "scientists" say. I say there are 9 planets and Pluto is one of them, and that's the way it's going to remain.
OK, we discovered five large bodies in the 1800s (Ceres, Pallas, Juno, Vesta, Hygeia) that were declared planets at the time. All of these objects are around the same size or larger than Pluto AND orbit between Mars and Jupiter.
There are TWELVE, count them TWELVE objects about the same size or larger than Pluto past Neptune (Chiron and Sedna being the largest).
There is even an object called Charon that orbits near Pluto that is almost the same size.
Why are these 17 objects not planets? Because in both cases, the first four objects and the other twelve object are in the same orbits with other countless objects, which by definition makes them astoriods.
Pluto is in the same orbit with uncountable smaller objects. By definition, that makes it an astoroid.
The definition of a planet according to the International Astronomical Union:
a celestial body that is (a) in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit
So, you can pick. We can either change the definition and go back to the old definition, in which case we have about 25 planets that we know of, or we can stick to the new, more consise definition and FOREVER have 8 planets.
We had a crappy definition, so we IMPROVED the definition. It's called PROGRESS for all you ignorants out there!!
_________________ C Mc
KJ, FL
|
|
Top |
|
|
Shunn
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 7:05 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:00 pm Posts: 637 Songs: 48 Location: Texas Been Liked: 0 time
|
Chuck2 @ Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:02 pm wrote: Oh great, now the planets are leaving us too? First it was site members now it's planets?
I am not happy. Did I really say something bad enough for Pluto to be downgraded like that?
Me and my big mouth.
Chuck, you did it again? You got Pluto banned? That's it, man! You better remove all your posts and hope they vote Pluto back in![schild=11 fontcolor=DC143C shadowcolor=00FFFF shieldshadow=1]Come back PLUTO![/schild]
_________________ Who loves ya baby?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 633 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|