|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Chuck2
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:17 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:35 am Posts: 4179 Location: Grand Prairie, TX Been Liked: 3 times
|
Steven Kaplan @ Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:58 am wrote: Thank you jazzy. It's been at least 35 years since I studied any of this, and come to think of it, I might NEVER have learned or questioned the actual derivation of the Perfect 4th and 5th. Although I do recall why they are the Sub Dominant, Dominant, etc.. It would make ALOT of sense to me if Pythagorus and Aristotle had ALOT of bearing on classical styles... Because even in the older days, Music being an "Aesthetic" area, European, or ancient Greek belief still was prevalent during the Baroque period (at least I think it was) and you DID in fact hear the goal was often to compose the "Perfect style" of music... The philosophy of Aesthetic areas..
Here, let me enter a quote from an excerpt that discussed "styles" of music during the older period.. It just makes alot of sense to me that THAT would've been the actual reason for the terms Perfect 4th and 5th.. Thanks Jazzy..
Here's the quote:
"It was the aim of Classical composers to achieve "perfect" music. That is, music that was completely perfect from a technical standpoint. This restriction led to very conservative music, strong but not really emotional. This is how most of Classical style music went and how the composers composed it (with the notable exception of Beethoven). Don’t get the wrong idea about this; the music Mozart gave us is beautiful and moving, and he was a born and bred Classical composer. Conservative does not mean boring. There are many notable examples of the Classical style, including the musical stereotype that is Beethoven’s 5th symphony."
One other question. Is the 7 tone scale also referred to as the "Diatonic scale" which is also Greek ? Another thing I forgot. I've so often heard kids on the piano being told "Diatonic" or just the white keys...Which I think technically is quite inaccurate... I assumed the Diatonic scale to be the term for the 7 tone scale.. I wish I still had my way-back machine so I could go to hear this music when it was first played.
I sold it to some dog and his boy.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Steven Kaplan
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:55 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:48 pm Posts: 13645 Been Liked: 11 times
|
Music theory and even music instrument lesson's were EXTREMELY conservative in the 1960's. Alot of classically trained musicians during that period shunned ALOT of what's evolved into acceptable music today.. They really did seem to be opponents of Jazz evolving, the didn't like it, I can vouch for that !! Not sure what todays thoughts in theory are regarding Parallelism., but parallel 5th's were always a HUGE no-no... I'm sure even years later, MANY cringed when they saw Berklee became an actual accredited 4 years school for music... Prior to that you had Julliard, Eastman, Hartt in the Northeast.. and if a person wanted a musical education besides one of the larger Universities such as Indiana... They auditioned to get into one of these schools... THings were so rigid when I started studying music, quite honestly I'm amazed that people even started accepting the Suzuki method in the 1960's when they did..
My parents, and their friends in fact said DO NOT allow Steve to study that "quack" fad.. (The classically trained older school musicians that is). THings were very rigid.. People were rigid in classical forms of music when I studied...When I got into rock music (at an older age) I had to keep it a secret for awhile... I actually did... It was as though I became a rebel, outlaw, and "bad kid" just based upon an aesthetic interest of my time !
_________________ Northeast United States runner up for the "Singing Hall of Shame".
|
|
Top |
|
|
Chuck2
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:01 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:35 am Posts: 4179 Location: Grand Prairie, TX Been Liked: 3 times
|
Schools understand that they are in business to make money. They will do what they can to maintain a high reputation but sometimes a compromise must be made.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Steven Kaplan
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:05 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:48 pm Posts: 13645 Been Liked: 11 times
|
Chuck, That's undeniably true. One problem I have with that line of thought, is that similarly when Money and business is what rules the path an Aesthetic area takes.. It's at the expense (IMHO) of the quality of the art-form... You compromise the art to "get rich", and personally I feel this is horrible. However this is just my opinion... I separate the two areas... If I don't enjoy I type of music... MONEY will not get me to perform it... Honestly... Business is a whole different area however... and the dollar is powerful
on the flipside of my train of thought however, there IS a positive aspect to this.. The music world now acknowledges a form of music *I* liked... So in reality this becomes SO totally subjective... All we know is that change, and evolution is inevitable... and much of what we do like is based upon our conditioning, and that which we become used to !
_________________ Northeast United States runner up for the "Singing Hall of Shame".
|
|
Top |
|
|
Chuck2
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:13 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:35 am Posts: 4179 Location: Grand Prairie, TX Been Liked: 3 times
|
Steven Kaplan @ Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:05 pm wrote: Chuck, That's undeniably true. One problem I have with that line of thought, is that similarly when Money and business is what rules the path an Aesthetic area takes.. It's at the expense (IMHO) of the quality of the art-form... You compromise the art to "get rich", and personally I feel this is horrible. However this is just my opinion... I separate the two areas... If I don't enjoy I type of music... MONEY will not get me to perform it... Honestly... Business is a whole different area however... and the dollar is powerful on the flipside of my train of thought however, there IS a positive aspect to this.. The music world now acknowledges a form of music *I* liked... So in reality this becomes SO totally subjective... All we know is that change, and evolution is inevitable... and much of what we do like is based upon our conditioning, and that which we become used to ! I tend to agree with you on the business aspect and the allowance of newer music.
Fortunately, they seem to take a slow approach to such an allowance. This lets fads just die and music that becomes more mainstream and lasts will eventually be accepted.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Steven Kaplan
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:55 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:48 pm Posts: 13645 Been Liked: 11 times
|
We've been "between styles" for a LONG time, haven't we been ? Now seems to be quite an ecclectic period, a more diverse time where there are many stations playing so many different styles. However in MY area at least. It's been that way for quite some time.
_________________ Northeast United States runner up for the "Singing Hall of Shame".
|
|
Top |
|
|
Steven Kaplan
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:58 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:48 pm Posts: 13645 Been Liked: 11 times
|
Quote: If you think about trying to sing a straight tone, your chords are a little more tightly adducted (held closed). This is not to say that you put undue stress or "squeeze" the chords, but liken it to holding a cup firmly (not tightly) in your grasp.
Jazzy, Is it the goal of a vocalist to be able to sustain a note for a long duration W/O breaking into a vibrato ? Is it also a goal to be able to control different types of vibrato's ? Or is that just VERY difficult to do, in lieu of the fact vibrato becomes somewhat of a natural quality or "habit".
_________________ Northeast United States runner up for the "Singing Hall of Shame".
|
|
Top |
|
|
Steven Kaplan
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:02 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:48 pm Posts: 13645 Been Liked: 11 times
|
Quote: I had a math teacher that made life even more difficult when he told me that how could somebody that played Bach so well be so pathetic in math....real inspiration that bozo.
I wonder how he'd also feel about most of the famous highly paid musicians today, failing rudimentary music theory, let alone Classic theory 1-2 and 300 level music comp... THat was close to rocket science IMO in terms of it's difficulty..
Realistically "how good" a musician is, involves specific areas of math, but like the person who can mix substances and blow certain things up, some musicians are technicians, not theorists, It's a different aspect of "math" and abstraction... Doesn't mean you can pass Quantitative sciences such as Organic Chemistry, Ace Algebra, or become another Architectural engineer who designs a city..
I have no knowledge of this, but wouldn't it be ironic, if even JS Bach flunked math ?, that wouldn't surprise me. Innovator, with a particular knack, or "nuance-specific" CAN preclude genius
We can even view this humorously.. JS Bach was known for "Counterpoint".. But how do we know that during the beginning of HIS time, he wasn't chastised for his coordination problems, maybe he had some type of brain dysfunction, and his intent was actually to play the notes of his left, and right hand simultaneously ? His instructors might've cringed, held their ears and screamed...
" Johanne !!! Didn't you practice playing your two octave scales with the metronome like I told you to" ? You are supposed to play those two notes TOGETHER !!
Bach: "I thought I just did" :(
Instructor: "Take up a different interest, You have no future as a musician, you
are a clutz"
_________________ Northeast United States runner up for the "Singing Hall of Shame".
|
|
Top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:08 pm |
|
|
Steve, I think they only there were only 18 keys on the instruments they played back then and it got lost in translation over the years. Many people don't realize it but the common, everyday egg slicer was actually used as a percussive string instrument back in his day. That's all they used it for. Then one day, while practicing chamber music Mozart dropped the hardboiled egg he had brought for lunch that day into the thing and history was made. Mozart was known for eating while performing--in fact, it was a "selling" point with him.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Chuck2
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:01 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:35 am Posts: 4179 Location: Grand Prairie, TX Been Liked: 3 times
|
michaeljayklein @ Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:08 pm wrote: Mozart was known for eating while performing--in fact, it was a "selling" point with him. ...just another example of how a truly talented person can have liberty from professionalism.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 1:38 am |
|
|
Somebody add something good in place of this post. Thank you, Michael
|
|
Top |
|
|
Steven Kaplan
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 6:47 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:48 pm Posts: 13645 Been Liked: 11 times
|
Karaoke Kelley started a thread "warm up songs" over in the Discussion Forum. I figured I'd steal it, and bring it over here, because quite honestly, I think it's an excellent thread that's important to consider. How many do "warmup songs" or warmup exercises before singing ? What is the importance of warming up first ? and most importantly HOW should/does a vocalist "warm up" ?
Sorry for stealing your thread Kelley, My hopes are in that posting it here it will get the attention it deserves, and not end up off-topic. My hopes are to keep this thread on topic. Meaning
"A more serious thread for musicians that wish for one to exist"
_________________ Northeast United States runner up for the "Singing Hall of Shame".
|
|
Top |
|
|
Chuck2
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 6:56 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:35 am Posts: 4179 Location: Grand Prairie, TX Been Liked: 3 times
|
Steven Kaplan @ Sat Aug 05, 2006 9:47 am wrote: Karaoke Kelley started a thread "warm up songs" over in the Discussion Forum. I figured I'd steal it, and bring it over here, because quite honestly, I think it's an excellent thread that's important to consider. How many do "warmup songs" or warmup exercises before singing ? What is the importance of warming up first ? and most importantly HOW should/does a vocalist "warm up" ? The importance of warming up is the same as for an athlete stretching their muscle to warm-up. It can help with range and quality but it helps prevent vocal damage. I sometimes warm up.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Steven Kaplan
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 7:00 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:48 pm Posts: 13645 Been Liked: 11 times
|
What does a warmup routine consist of ? How long should a person "warmup" ?
_________________ Northeast United States runner up for the "Singing Hall of Shame".
|
|
Top |
|
|
Steven Kaplan
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 7:05 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:48 pm Posts: 13645 Been Liked: 11 times
|
How does a new singer, with no prior formal training, establish his/her proper singing range ? How could I know what my correct vocal register is ? There often is a tendency for those of us that like the rock genre, to hear our actual voice lower than it actually sounds, You may have noticed that many inexperienced male rock vocalists have a tendency to try to push their singing range up into a tenor range. That's not always natural for a person that might be a baritone, or bass.
_________________ Northeast United States runner up for the "Singing Hall of Shame".
|
|
Top |
|
|
Chuck2
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 7:18 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:35 am Posts: 4179 Location: Grand Prairie, TX Been Liked: 3 times
|
Steven Kaplan @ Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:00 am wrote: What does a warmup routine consist of ? How long should a person "warmup" ? I do some very boring and sometimes funny warmups that I learned doing dinner theater as a child. I will post some of mine if needed but it maybe from the wrong point of view since many of my warmups are for articulation as well as voice.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Chuck2
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 7:25 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:35 am Posts: 4179 Location: Grand Prairie, TX Been Liked: 3 times
|
Steven Kaplan @ Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:05 am wrote: How does a new singer, with no prior formal training, establish his/her proper singing range ? How could I know what my correct vocal register is ? There often is a tendency for those of us that like the rock genre, to hear our actual voice lower than it actually sounds, You may have noticed that many inexperienced male rock vocalists have a tendency to try to push their singing range up into a tenor range. That's not always natural for a person that might be a baritone, or bass. Most men are actually baritone or second tenor. That is where my strongest voice is. I was fortunate enough to have a broader than average range. I am just posting the part that is relevent to me. I recomend someone who teaches voice to give the better answer. You know who you are.
BTW- I am serious about my singing just as I am serious about my acting. I am not so serious about Improv, but I love to do that too. I just hope that I am considered serious enough to post in this thread since the name has changed.
I guess I should get that answer from my signature.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Steven Kaplan
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 7:32 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:48 pm Posts: 13645 Been Liked: 11 times
|
That makes sense Chuck. Alot of the rock vocalists had voices in the tenor range, of course alot of these vocalists were also teenagers during that time too, that or early 20s. I suppose there were also the baritones too, My guess is Jim Morrison would've been a baritone for instance. Seems that when ever I listen to a tape of amateurs, especially relatively newer less experienced vocalists trying to sing something that isn't traditional blues, but more of a classic harder rock genre.. It almost sounds as though their register is contrived, pushed up, and not natural. I suppose the few first tenors, that sing in that range, are often the males that just happen to have higher voices to begin with, or vocal chords that are naturally suited to higher range singing ? How many once older, and mature can handle the first tenor range ? Don't singers vocals ranges continue to lower slightly as they get older ? Also any infection, throat surgery often will lower a persons voice too (I think)
_________________ Northeast United States runner up for the "Singing Hall of Shame".
|
|
Top |
|
|
Redhead1
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 8:09 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 9:38 pm Posts: 159 Been Liked: 0 time
|
I haven't been over here in the forums in quite some time, but this topic captured my interest. I would categorize myself as a serious singer and would love to have real feedback. Steven gave me a critique on a song quite awhile ago that I found to be very helpful. There are many areas in my performances where I know I fall short. For instance, I have a difficult time transitioning to notes that are in the bottom of my register...they often lack that full-bodied sound. That's just one element among several that I'm becoming more aware of. Any techniques/exercises that would help me correct the problem would be helpful. When I'm doing normal warm-ups, I don't seem to have the problem so much since I'm focusing on moving up and down the scale as seamlessly as possible. The trouble appears on performances of certain songs.
I'm so happy to have discovered this thread. I really would love to receive feedback that would help me to improve in all areas. Those of you who are familiar with my voice probably can think of some elements that stand out to you as problem areas, though I may already be aware of them myself.
Also, some of you were talking about vibrato. Mine only seems to come in one speed...I wish I could slow it down a bit on certain songs, but have no idea if that's possible to do or how to do it.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 9:15 am |
|
|
I think we were talking about warm up exercises or songs we do before singing. One excercise I learned works great for loosening up your jaw and facial muscles connected with singing...this works wonders especially for highstrung shmos like myself who have a tendency to be a bit tense...
Just go up the scale and sing "PAW" each note (you don't even have to do a scale, but it seems to work better) with the emphasis on the "P" and sing it with as much force as you can. Ideally, your cheeks should swell out a bit. Practice in the mirror. Your lips should be like "fish lips".
Do this for a minute or so or until you feel your mandibles loosening up.
I have another little "tip" I learned that I'll post later. This one is great!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 773 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|