|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 20 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
robdogkaraoke
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:06 pm |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 8:46 pm Posts: 472 Location: MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CANADA Been Liked: 0 time
|
Finally picked up the Mackie CXF12mkII what an awesome board. I'm now officially an ex behringer user. Thanks for all your input everyone. By the way massive sound quality difference.
_________________ ROBDOG *WOOF WOOF*
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:18 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
robdogkaraoke @ Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:06 pm wrote: I'm now officially an ex behringer user. Thanks for all your input everyone. By the way massive sound quality difference.
Welcome to the world of good sound quality!
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
robdogkaraoke
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:26 pm |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 8:46 pm Posts: 472 Location: MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CANADA Been Liked: 0 time
|
Lonman @ Sun Jun 04, 2006 5:18 pm wrote: robdogkaraoke @ Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:06 pm wrote: I'm now officially an ex behringer user. Thanks for all your input everyone. By the way massive sound quality difference. Welcome to the world of good sound quality!
Yup , But I still gotta get used to the effects. Not sure which to use for a nice reverb type effect. Any Idea's Lonman?
_________________ ROBDOG *WOOF WOOF*
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:42 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
robdogkaraoke @ Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:26 pm wrote: Yup , But I still gotta get used to the effects. Not sure which to use for a nice reverb type effect. Any Idea's Lonman?
Well I use an outboard effect processor for delay in conjunction with the internal reverb to get a layered effect for different songs. The internal reverb setting I generally use is the med or large plate. Spring for older 50's 60's tunes Chorus, flange or phaser for some current rock. But primarily the plate verbs for most songs.
But play with them, you'll get some fun ones that you'll be able to use with certain songs for sure.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
robdogkaraoke
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:51 pm |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 8:46 pm Posts: 472 Location: MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CANADA Been Liked: 0 time
|
Thanks Lon I will play around untill it fits
_________________ ROBDOG *WOOF WOOF*
|
|
Top |
|
|
Kellyoke
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:18 am |
|
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 627 Location: TN Been Liked: 1 time
|
Congrats Robdog! I personally feel it is one of the best all around mixers. And as Lonman said, play around with it. You'll find different effects work better at times depending on the venue.
Kelly
|
|
Top |
|
|
robdogkaraoke
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:42 am |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 8:46 pm Posts: 472 Location: MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CANADA Been Liked: 0 time
|
Will do. Thanks Kelly
_________________ ROBDOG *WOOF WOOF*
|
|
Top |
|
|
Babs
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:20 am |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 11:37 am Posts: 7979 Location: Suburbs Been Liked: 0 time
|
I confess I too am a Mackie lover. :oh yeah:
_________________ [shadow=pink][glow=deepskyblue]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
[updown] ~*~ MONKEY BUSINESS KARAOKE~*~ [/shadow][/updown][/glow]
|
|
Top |
|
|
mroctober
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:29 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 1:52 pm Posts: 680 Location: Gainesville Florida Been Liked: 2 times
|
wow ...did a google search and founs the mackie CFX12.mkll and saw a price of $1495.00
then saw it was in Austrailia
Musicians friend has it for $499.00
that much of a difference huh? ( in sound )
Might have to sell my berringher and go mackie.
Thanks
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:33 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
mroctober @ Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:29 pm wrote: Might have to sell my berringher and go mackie. Thanks
It makes a difference!
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
robdogkaraoke
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:16 pm |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 8:46 pm Posts: 472 Location: MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CANADA Been Liked: 0 time
|
I got it $599. Canadian plus tax. Go for it mroctober you'll love it!
_________________ ROBDOG *WOOF WOOF*
|
|
Top |
|
|
Micky
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:26 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 6:13 pm Posts: 1625 Location: Montreal, Canada Been Liked: 34 times
|
robdogkaraoke @ Sun Jun 04, 2006 6:06 pm wrote: Finally picked up the Mackie CXF12mkII what an awesome board. I'm now officially an ex behringer user. Thanks for all your input everyone. By the way massive sound quality difference.
I'm next on the list I have this board in mind
|
|
Top |
|
|
micbob
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:18 pm |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 218 Location: Fredericksburg, VA Been Liked: 0 time
|
Is there a big difference (sound quality) between the DFX 12 and the Mackie CXF12mkII?
|
|
Top |
|
|
knightshow
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:16 am |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 2:40 am Posts: 7468 Location: Kansas City, MO Been Liked: 1 time
|
the dfx series doesn't allow for the adjustment of the midrange like the cfx series does.
Yeah... it can!
|
|
Top |
|
|
gunghouk
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:57 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:30 am Posts: 140 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Aside from the new panel graphics and coloured knobs the Mk II is the same internally as the original CFX12 (Mackies own words). I just picked an original CFX12 up from Ebay for £143 with a flightcase (about US$230).
I've had a DFX6 and DFX12 and a load of Behringers, the last one being a Xenyx 1832FX (nice full featured mixer). I have to confess to likeing the mellower sound of the Mackies though.
Bottom line is go for a MK1 CFX mixer for a much lower cost than the MKII coz they sound the same anyway.
If I had bit the bullet in the beginning then maybe I wouldn't have spend so much time, energy and money looking for the ultimate small, versatile and sweet sounding mixer.
Still I got there in the end (well maybe )
GH
|
|
Top |
|
|
Jian
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:28 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 10:18 pm Posts: 4080 Location: Serian Been Liked: 0 time
|
They are Chinese, those low end Mackie. Am I right?
_________________ I can neither confirm nor deny ever having or knowing anything about nothing.... mrscott
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:49 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Jian @ Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:28 am wrote: They are Chinese, those low end Mackie. Am I right?
Yes alot of the Mackie line are made in China - as with MOST of the lower priced equipment from ANY manufacturer these days. Each manufacturer still have their own design & performance specs to work up to.
The CFX line isn't exactly a low end board - grant you, it isn't their greatest either, but still blows much of the competition away sound wise, the DFX would be the lowest on the Mackie line.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Jian
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 8:45 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 10:18 pm Posts: 4080 Location: Serian Been Liked: 0 time
|
From what I know Peavey have not made the move yet?
_________________ I can neither confirm nor deny ever having or knowing anything about nothing.... mrscott
|
|
Top |
|
|
SwingcatKurt
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:14 am |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2003 10:35 pm Posts: 1889 Images: 1 Location: portland, oregon Been Liked: 59 times
|
Mackie vs Yamaha 1000 watt powered mixers-----what do you think?---flat board type--not the square shaped box type
_________________ "You know that I sing the Blues and I do not suffer fools. When I'm on that silver mic, it's gonna cut ya, just like a knife"-The SWINGCAT
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:58 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
SwingcatKurt @ Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:14 am wrote: Mackie vs Yamaha 1000 watt powered mixers-----what do you think?---flat board type--not the square shaped box type
If I had a choice between a flat board & box type board, I would actually opt for the flat Yamaha - however Mackie doesn't make a flat powered board yet to really compare to. I personally don't care for box type mixers.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 20 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Dr Fred and 697 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|