Yes, please make this sticky. I actually enjoy reading their arguments.

All you have to do is pick any thread and wait. Mr. Staley will eventually wedge his vendetta against SC into the conversation, I'll have no choice but to respond, etc.

All you have to do is pick any thread and wait. Mr. Staley will eventually wedge his vendetta against SC into the conversation, I'll have no choice but to respond, etc.

It takes two people to argue,,, hmmm,, I wonder who is the second person??? and who is the first???

Do you think Mr. Staley should be able to use this forum as a platform to present unchallenged misinformation and untruths about SC? When you suggest that I should just ignore him, that's really what you're saying.

I have a responsibility to correct incorrect information about Sound Choice, and I will continue to do that. You can look back over the entirety of my participation over this board, and you'll never see a single instance of my turning a thread about an unrelated topic into a thread about SC. The same cannot be said of Mr. Staley.

You can look back over the entirety of my participation over this board, and you'll never see a single instance of my turning a thread about an unrelated topic into a thread about SC. The same cannot be said of Mr. Staley.

How about this thread that is actually titled "Non SC/karaoke question for Timberlea"?
It instantly spiraled into a thread all about SC once you jumped into the fray.
viewtopic.php?f=26&t=23252

Uhmm What are the manufacturers doing to combat piracy other than financing the ones they bust.? A license is issued to a DJ/KJ.... He is found out to have been Busted for piracy , the license is pulled simple. As part of an ASCAP/BMI agreement the bar/venue cannot host said DJ. I made the ascap part up but I hope you get the idea. I am Licensed in Massachusettes for 2 different Fields Lifting/Hoist and also Digging. If I operate and get caught the mass dept of safety then can issue fines. Dont even start with an industrial accident. Pretty easy. no license no work.


Johnny What is you fantasy of how the music world can be fixed. I know SC isnt go about it the right way. If they Nailed the guys via a real investigation I'd have no problem. Noooo Gotta throw everyone in a lawsuit first then sort later.

Just as every positive SC comment does not need to be instantly refuted with a negative one, the reverse is also true.

You mean the thread that featured this comment, to which my response was directed:
I didn't make that thread about SC. "thewraith" did.

You can look back over the entirety of my participation over this board, and you'll never see a single instance of my turning a thread about an unrelated topic into a thread about SC.

And obviously you ignored entirely and did jump in the thread that was titled:
"Non SC/karaoke question for Timberlea"

Specifically EXcluding SC and asked about "ALL THE OTHER" manufacturers. But you had to stick your response in there because you felt you needed to defend the accusation of a lack of investigations? Do I need to pull the documentation of APS that proves there was in fact, a lack of investigations?

You weren't responding to "correct misinformation" at all, you were trying to deflect from the truth because that would sting a little. Sorry, nice try.
SC was specifically EXCLUDED from the thread, but you had to make it about SC. And this is exactly how you twist an untruth into you being some sort of victim.

So this statement is actually 100% untrue:

(1) The thread wasn't about SC,
(2) The title specifically excluded SC and,
(3) The thread was directed to timberlea but,
(3) You jumped in and made your argument in defense of Sound Choice.

Cracks me up how often you accuse me of lying and you turn around pull this crap.

Are you high?

I don't respond to "negative" SC comments. I respond to requests for information and statements that contain incorrect information, both of which applied in that thread from the very beginning of the comments about SC.

I cannot leave those two categories unanswered. If I left questions unanswered, I would be criticized for ignoring people. (And believe me, that's happened lots of times when I took more than a day to respond to a question.) In the second category, allowing incorrect information to go unchallenged would lead to that information being accepted as true.

If that makes you uncomfortable, so be it, but your wrath is properly directed at the people who assert the incorrect, false, or misleading information in the first place.

The only fantasy is in your own mind, that we don't do a "real investigation" before filing lawsuits.

Infinite likes!

You can look back over the entirety of my participation over this board, and you'll never see a single instance of my turning a thread about an unrelated topic into a thread about SC.