KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - Download Based Host - OR- "1:1" Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Fri Jan 17, 2025 3:34 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:38 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
Are you going to answer the question I asked above (Originally asked of Timberlea-J.C.):

"
You buy a download {any manufacturer's}- for which you NEVER had a disc.. You're not "1:1". Can you use it? Keep in mind that only SC uses the 1:1 bit to any great length in the karaoke industry. Can you use that download, or does 1:1 ONLY have relevance to SC?"

*************************************
As you have noted, SC is the only company talking about 1:1 or doing any enforcement around it. From the SC point of view, 1:1 refers to a relationship between a physical disc and a copy to another disc or to a ripped format. Downloads are (obviously) different and the 1:1 would presumably mean 1 download for every 1 rig it will be used on.

-Chris
**********************************


A near miss, Chris. This was about disc ownership-possession- for every track. When I stated that I had receipts for all, someone answered that this wasn't enough. How could I prove that I hadn't sold the disc on e-bay, or to another KJ if I lost an original disc?

The same would go for a download, for which there ISN'T any disc. How can one prove that, once downloaded, infinite copies were not made and distributed?

Therefore, if one is pro-SC methodology, one is then a believer in their "1:1" formula. That being said, no pro-SC methodology host (aka "Cheerleader") can be a download host without being a complete hippocrite.

Hence, my question: How many pro-SC methodology hosts here are also using downloads- of ANY brand- without buying a corresponding disc?

For example: Chris, do you use downloads in your show for which you have no corresponding disc OR are you "1:1"?

**********************************

No answer from Chris or Timberlea. I'm thinking that even "Cheerleaders" are having trouble with SC's "1:1" wishes and downloading.

Can't be both, but I'm certain some who claim to be "1:1" are also downloaders- Download hosts have discussed it here.

Anyone care to show some courage and step up?

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Last edited by JoeChartreuse on Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 5:08 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm
Posts: 4094
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Been Liked: 309 times
We're neither.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:25 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
A near miss, Chris. This was about disc ownership-possession- for every track. When I stated that I had receipts for all, someone answered that this wasn't enough. How could I prove that I hadn't sold the disc on e-bay, or to another KJ if I lost an original disc?

The same would go for a download, for which there ISN'T any disc. How can one prove that, once downloaded, infinite copies were not made and distributed?


No more than one can prove that once a disc has been acquired that infinite burns were not produced then distributed. There is a code of honor that applies here. Some ignore it, others do not.

JoeChartreuse wrote:
Therefore, if one is pro-SC methodology, one is then a believer in their "1:1" formula. That being said, no pro-SC methodology host (aka "Cheerleader") can be a download host without being a complete hippocrite.


I can easily recognize Sound Choice's 1:1 policy as it pertains to physical discs while recognizing technology trends that suggest 1:1 is intended to mean One Download:One System. That doesn't make me a hypocrite, it means I keep up with technological advances and I adhere to the spirit of the policy all the while paying for ALL of my karaoke music, and supporting the industry.

JoeChartreuse wrote:
Hence, my question: How many pro-SC methodology hosts here are also using downloads- of ANY brand- without buying a corresponding disc?


Silly question. Nobody can or will ever be able to answer this question because there are no comprehensive records regarding hosts (regardless of SC stance) and how they obtain their music.

The "here" clause won't do you any good because no one "here" is obligated to answer and "here" is only a very small sampling of the total number of karaoke hosts in the US that pay for downloads. Too many people "here" form opinions about the entire state of the karaoke industry based on what happens "here" instead or what really takes place out there.

JoeChartreuse wrote:
For example: Chris, do you use downloads in your show for which you have no corresponding disc OR are you "1:1"?


You know the answer to this - Yes. I purchase downloads. By their very nature, there is no disc. I am beginning to think that luddite is not a sufficient adjective for you.

JoeChartreuse wrote:
No answer from Chris or Timberlea. I'm thinking that even "Cheerleaders" are having trouble with SC's "1:1" wishes and downloading.

Can't be both, but I'm certain some who claim to be "1:1" are also downloaders- Download hosts have discussed it here.

Anyone care to show some courage and step up?


Challenge Accepted (pulling on my big boy courage pants):

I am 1:1 and I am a paid downloader. As I have explained above, they can easily and peacefully co-exist.

I purchase downloads on a per rig basis. I use separate accounts per rig to help ensure I don't accidentally download the same track to more than one system. I have thus paid for "Call Me Maybe" downloads 3 times according to my records. I am therefore 1:1 on a Download:Rig basis. The same as you should be 1:1 from a Disc:Rig basis.

As noted above, I keep up with technological trends and I adhere to the spirit of the suggested policies. Sound Choice has their definition of 1:1 tied to physical discs because that is all they produce. KaraokeVersion.com can't have a 1:1 policy tied to discs because they don't produce discs. They produce downloads. Thus I apply 1:1 on a Download:Rig basis. That is the spirit of what is trying to be accomplished.

Your attempt to position people who download as somehow being incompatible with Sound Choice 1:1 policy is futile.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:48 am 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:04 pm
Posts: 336
Been Liked: 33 times
For an easy answer to the question of 1-1 downloads, anyone can be receive anwsers from the 2 legal download sites here in the USA. Simply email Digitrax and All Star Karaoke and ask for the rules. They will be happy to educate anyone who asks.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:39 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
Ya know.....since there aren't any absolute rules in any of this, it really only takes a little common sense and honesty to ensure you are doing the right thing.

This pretty much sums it up - Pay for everything you use.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:23 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
chrisavis wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
A near miss, Chris. This was about disc ownership-possession- for every track. When I stated that I had receipts for all, someone answered that this wasn't enough. How could I prove that I hadn't sold the disc on e-bay, or to another KJ if I lost an original disc?

The same would go for a download, for which there ISN'T any disc. How can one prove that, once downloaded, infinite copies were not made and distributed?


No more than one can prove that once a disc has been acquired that infinite burns were not produced then distributed. There is a code of honor that applies here. Some ignore it, others do not.

So, answer number one: You are a downloader, and you do not buy the discs that to match the songs-which is what SC wants. You do as you wish with other brands. You are NOT "1:1". SO- you are saying that "1:1"- in your opinion- is neither a "rule" nor a "legality", but only a wish of SC. RIGHT???

JoeChartreuse wrote:
Therefore, if one is pro-SC methodology, one is then a believer in their "1:1" formula. That being said, no pro-SC methodology host (aka "Cheerleader") can be a download host without being a complete hippocrite.


I can easily recognize Sound Choice's 1:1 policy as it pertains to physical discs while recognizing technology trends that suggest 1:1 is intended to mean One Download:One System.
Nope, SC's "1:1" policy means that you own and possess the disc for each and every track on your computer,
That doesn't make me a hypocrite,.......
YES, it does....

JoeChartreuse wrote:
Hence, my question: How many pro-SC methodology hosts here are also using downloads- of ANY brand- without buying a corresponding disc?


Silly question. Nobody can or will ever be able to answer this question because there are no comprehensive records regarding hosts (regardless of SC stance) and how they obtain their music.
Of course the CAN- they just won't.

The "here" clause won't do you any good because no one "here" is obligated....

Of course no one is OBLIGATED- I would only hope that those with any honor at all do. Anyone else use downloads while supposedly subscribing to SC's "1:1"?

JoeChartreuse wrote:
For example: Chris, do you use downloads in your show for which you have no corresponding disc OR are you "1:1"?


You know the answer to this - Yes. I purchase downloads. By their very nature, there is no disc. I am beginning to think that luddite is not a sufficient adjective for you.

JoeChartreuse wrote:
No answer from Chris or Timberlea. I'm thinking that even "Cheerleaders" are having trouble with SC's "1:1" wishes and downloading.

Can't be both, but I'm certain some who claim to be "1:1" are also downloaders- Download hosts have discussed it here.

Anyone care to show some courage and step up?


Challenge Accepted (pulling on my big boy courage pants):

I am 1:1 and I am a paid downloader. As I have explained above, they can easily and peacefully co-exist.

Therefore you are NOT "1:1" per SC mentality, and do not consider it a rule or a legality- only a bending to SC's wishes.. That's one, and thank you.
Your attempt to position people who download as

somehow being incompatible with Sound Choice 1:1 policy is futile.

-Chris


Then you need to do a bit more thinking. SC's "1:1" policy requires a disc for every track. You do not follow that policy. You- though an SC customer, are not in compliance and open to legal suit, whether audited or not.

Worse, those who paid in good faith for SC tracks from Clark, DOPi, and the original T-soft are screwed as well- by SC.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:40 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
The SC policy is for SC tracks only.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 12:13 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
Lonman wrote:
The SC policy is for SC tracks only.



Agreed, and my point...

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:10 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
Lonman wrote:
The SC policy is for SC tracks only.



Agreed, and my point...


So how am I a hypocrite again? How am I open to a lawsuit?

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:29 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
Nope, SC's "1:1" policy means that you own and possess the disc for each and every track on your computer,


The policy actually says "original media," not "disc."

For SC, for now, that means the same thing. For other manus, it could mean something else. But I don't see what the issue is. SC's policy has the force of law as applied to SC's tracks, because the law gives us the right to grant or withhold authorization. With respect to others' tracks, our focus is on making certain that pirates don't use unpaid copies of other brands to compete unfairly. Our media-shifting policy is irrelevant to that.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:57 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:11 am
Posts: 1832
Location: TX
Been Liked: 59 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
Nope, SC's "1:1" policy means that you own and possess the disc for each and every track on your computer,


The policy actually says "original media," not "disc."

For SC, for now, that means the same thing. For other manus, it could mean something else. But I don't see what the issue is. SC's policy has the force of law as applied to SC's tracks, because the law gives us the right to grant or withhold authorization. With respect to others' tracks, our focus is on making certain that pirates don't use unpaid copies of other brands to compete unfairly. Our media-shifting policy is irrelevant to that.


Then how can you require KJ's to remove other manu's material if it is found on their systems and they do no have a physical disc for it?

_________________
I like everyone when I first meet them. If you don't like me that's not my problem it's YOURS!
A stranger is a friend you haven't met yet


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:07 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
Lone Wolf wrote:
Then how can you require KJ's to remove other manu's material if it is found on their systems and they do no have a physical disc for it?


We don't. At least, that's not the whole story. The injunctions we propose (and that get entered) merely require that the defendant obtain written permission from the manu they obtained it from. In the case of a (legal) download, what is authorized by the manu would be governed by the terms of service associated with the download, and would ordinarily include permission.

When we do it by settlement, there are accommodations for other media types, including downloads.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:35 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am
Posts: 752
Images: 1
Been Liked: 73 times
chrisavis wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
Lonman wrote:
The SC policy is for SC tracks only.



Agreed, and my point...


So how am I a hypocrite again? How am I open to a lawsuit?

-Chris


A response worth considering to the second question is that, if this attempt to make the presence of other company's material on a PC controllable by a third party is continuously upheld, you can be approached with OR without their material and be sued by anyone...I cannot help but believe that attempts to enforce this scenario should be considered overreaching.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:42 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
timberlea wrote:
We're neither.



Once again, Timberlea, no one said your were. I asked your opinion of pro-SC methodology KJs who would use downloads to run their shows without having corresponding discs.

I'm not here to out anyone, but know some do, as they have discussed it here.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:53 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
chrisavis wrote:
[You know the answer to this - Yes. I purchase downloads. By their very nature, there is no disc. I am beginning to think that luddite is not a sufficient adjective for you.

JoeChartreuse wrote:
No answer from Chris or Timberlea. I'm thinking that even "Cheerleaders" are having trouble with SC's "1:1" wishes and downloading.

Can't be both, but I'm certain some who claim to be "1:1" are also downloaders- Download hosts have discussed it here.

Anyone care to show some courage and step up?

I am 1:1 and I am a paid downloader. As I have explained above, they can easily and peacefully co-exist.
Your attempt to position people who download as somehow being incompatible with Sound Choice 1:1 policy is futile.

-Chris


First understand that I have no policies regarding how another KJ runs his/her business- I am speaking of SC.

SC's "1:1" policy is a disc for every track. WHile I'm sure you are compliant to their wishes in regard to their brand, your entire library is NOT "1:1" as described by SC.

I couldn't care less. The point is that by doing this, you are saying that you don't believe SC's WISHES have anything to do with being "legal" or "legit". If you did, your entire library would be "1:1".

I happen to agree with you, by the way.

You simply wish to comply with their wishes in regard to their brand, which is up to you.

That's one. Anyone else?

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:56 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
kjflorida wrote:
For an easy answer to the question of 1-1 downloads, anyone can be receive anwsers from the 2 legal download sites here in the USA. Simply email Digitrax and All Star Karaoke and ask for the rules. They will be happy to educate anyone who asks.



Really? Wasn't it you who recently posted that your own wife states that if you want answers like that you do NOT ask the salesman/supplier??

I agree with her by the way- alway said she's a smart lady... :D

However, this thread is NOT about the merits or lack thereof regarding downloading in general.

This was the question:

(You buy a download (any manufacturer's)- for which you NEVER had a disc.. You're not "1:1". can you use it? Keep in mind that only SC uses the 1:1 bit to any great length in the karaoke industry. Can you use that download, or does 1:1 ONLY have relevance to SC?"

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Last edited by JoeChartreuse on Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:58 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
chrisavis wrote:
Ya know.....since there aren't any absolute rules in any of this, it really only takes a little common sense and honesty to ensure you are doing the right thing.

This pretty much sums it up - Pay for everything you use.

-Chris


Agreed, but nothing to do with the OP.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:05 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
Nope, SC's "1:1" policy means that you own and possess the disc for each and every track on your computer,


The policy actually says "original media," not "disc."

For SC, for now, that means the same thing. For other manus, it could mean something else..


No argument with what you wrote, but had no relevance to the OP.

I hear a lot of language mangling here. "Legal" or "Legit" instead of "Compliant.". Pro-SC hosts are saying that if one doesn't follow SC's wishes, then they are neither.

Yet somehow they only apply this to SC product, meaning that apparently they don't follow their own rules for defining "Legit" and "Legal".

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:18 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
chrisavis wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
Lonman wrote:
The SC policy is for SC tracks only.



Agreed, and my point...


So how am I a hypocrite again? How am I open to a lawsuit?

-Chris


You ( and other pro-SC methodology folks)do not make that distinction when you post. You folks describe those who don't comply to SC's wishes as not "legal", not "legit", and sometimes "pirates"- even if they paid for their tracks- simply because they don't want to pay for an audit, or even merely because SC has sued them.

As for lawsuits-: If one of your download brands ever decided to go the way of SC, you would be non-compliant ( or if you prefer, not "legal"). This would also apply to those downloaded SC tracks that were availble from Dopi, the the original T-soft, and at least one other site- even if you paid for them. Sure, you could do what you and other Pro-SC folks knock others for and go scurrying to buy up product- but it doesn't change the fact that you are not running "1:1" NOW- yet you can call yourself "legal" because it's not SC.

Bottom line: SC does not make the laws, and despite your stance here you agree with me in regard to the running of your show.

SO- how about knocking off the use of "legal" and "legit" and stick with merely "SC Compliant"? A lot less confrontational, and certainly more truthful.

Chris, I never said that you are doing anything wrong. I just said that you're not "1:1" per SC's description, except for SC product. Ease up......

BTW- Nothing to do with SC, but a download host would have a harder time proving purchase in good faith than one who owns the disc, should the sleeping giants ( publishers/owners) ever awaken. Doesn't mean the disc owner would be immune, but owning the mfrs. discs would at least shift some of the liability.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:16 am 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
chrisavis wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
Lonman wrote:
The SC policy is for SC tracks only.



Agreed, and my point...


So how am I a hypocrite again? How am I open to a lawsuit?

-Chris


You ( and other pro-SC methodology folks)do not make that distinction when you post. You folks describe those who don't comply to SC's wishes as not "legal", not "legit", and sometimes "pirates"- even if they paid for their tracks- simply because they don't want to pay for an audit, or even merely because SC has sued them.

As for lawsuits-: If one of your download brands ever decided to go the way of SC, you would be non-compliant ( or if you prefer, not "legal"). This would also apply to those downloaded SC tracks that were availble from Dopi, the the original T-soft, and at least one other site- even if you paid for them. Sure, you could do what you and other Pro-SC folks knock others for and go scurrying to buy up product- but it doesn't change the fact that you are not running "1:1" NOW- yet you can call yourself "legal" because it's not SC.

Bottom line: SC does not make the laws, and despite your stance here you agree with me in regard to the running of your show.

SO- how about knocking off the use of "legal" and "legit" and stick with merely "SC Compliant"? A lot less confrontational, and certainly more truthful.

Chris, I never said that you are doing anything wrong. I just said that you're not "1:1" per SC's description, except for SC product. Ease up......

BTW- Nothing to do with SC, but a download host would have a harder time proving purchase in good faith than one who owns the disc, should the sleeping giants ( publishers/owners) ever awaken. Doesn't mean the disc owner would be immune, but owning the mfrs. discs would at least shift some of the liability.

I disagree. 1:1 ONLY applies to those buying the original media (a disc) and shifting it to hard drive - regardless of manu - however SC is the only one enforcing that stance. 1 disc to 1 shifted product in a single system ie 1:1.
A download IS the original media, there is no 1:1 rule, you are not shifting the media from one format to another that it wasn't originally sold in, you are putting it on the hard drive in the format you bought it. If you put it on ANOTHER hard drive for a multi show purpose, then you would need to purchase a 2nd copy of that track. And if you want to get nitpicky how about 1:1 = 1 download per 1 system!

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 108 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech