Maybe Phill can set the site up to reject any post with incorrect grammar or spelling.
| Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums https://mail.karaokescene.net/forums/ |
|
| Pocket Songs an unlicensed brand? https://mail.karaokescene.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=24102 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Second City Song [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Pocket Songs an unlicensed brand? |
Wow! 573 Pocket Songs listed in that Warner lawsuit against that karaoke express website! http://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/29/d ... -05-21-12/ Do you think Pocket Songs will now have problems producing new music? |
|
| Author: | mightywiz [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Pocket Songs an unlicensed brand? |
thats why all of us people that bought their music in good faith should start a class action lawsuit against all these manufactures..... |
|
| Author: | timberlea [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Pocket Songs an unlicensed brand? |
Again, people who do not understand leagalese. It is not saying the songs produced by Pocket Songs, SC, CB, etc are not licenced (at least in this suit). It is saying the Defendant is/was selling CDs that were counterfeit and therefore not licenced. A genuine disc is licenced, a counterfeit is not licenced. It is similar to Copyright/Trademark. I guess they believe it is easier to go the unlicenced route to the counterfeit route. |
|
| Author: | Lonman [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Pocket Songs an unlicensed brand? |
timberlea wrote: Again, people who do not understand leagalese. It is not saying the songs produced by Pocket Songs, SC, CB, etc are not licenced (at least in this suit). It is saying the Defendant is/was selling CDs that were counterfeit and therefore not licenced. Which is why one of the members here said they wouldn't shop there anymore because they received burns instead of actual product. |
|
| Author: | Second City Song [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Pocket Songs an unlicensed brand? |
timberlea and Lonman. Thank you for making these points. This is what I was hoping to hear and basically why I created the thread. All this anti - (enter manu here) talk gets really old when it has nothing to do with the original thread topics! |
|
| Author: | earthling12357 [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Pocket Songs an unlicensed brand? |
timberlea wrote: Again, people who do not understand leagalese. It is not saying the songs produced by Pocket Songs, SC, CB, etc are not licenced (at least in this suit). It is saying the Defendant is/was selling CDs that were counterfeit and therefore not licenced. A genuine disc is licenced, a counterfeit is not licenced. It is similar to Copyright/Trademark. I guess they believe it is easier to go the unlicenced route to the counterfeit route. Oh please, Oh please, Mr. "leagalease", Won't you show us where in that lawsuit it says what you have just claimed? |
|
| Author: | karaokegod73 [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Pocket Songs an unlicensed brand? |
If people writing these legal complaints can't write proper English that doesn't need to be interpreted then good luck to them. |
|
| Author: | johnny reverb [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Pocket Songs an unlicensed brand? |
Maybe Phill can set the site up to reject any post with incorrect grammar or spelling.
|
|
| Author: | Brian A [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Pocket Songs an unlicensed brand? |
I think it’s a matter of typing too fast. I typed the word leagalese & there was a red underline. The forum is equipped with auto correct spell checks or word recognition. A red underline indicates a possible spelling error. Right click on that word in order to bring up the correct spelling options. I use it all the time. Just a friendly suggestion in case you’re not aware of this great feature.
|
|
| Author: | Paradigm Karaoke [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Pocket Songs an unlicensed brand? |
haha, i use that all the time. i think i could misspell my own name sometimes. |
|
| Author: | Brian A [ Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Pocket Songs an unlicensed brand? |
Paradigm Karaoke wrote: haha, i use that all the time. i think i could misspell my own name sometimes. Likewise. Every now & then I misspelled my name Brian to Brain. 
|
|
| Author: | diafel [ Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Pocket Songs an unlicensed brand? |
timberlea wrote: It is not saying the songs produced by Pocket Songs, SC, CB, etc are not licenced (at least in this suit). It is saying the Defendant is/was selling CDs that were counterfeit and therefore not licenced. Really?? where in the suit does it say that, or is this just mere speculation? If so, perhaps you should label it as such, since you usually like to be so sticky about such things. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|