Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm Posts: 1636 Been Liked:73 times
Earthling and Lepardlizard, Thank you for getting what it was that I was trying to get accross I understand that there are those who feel that it would be better IF SC were to sue under copyright law instead of Trademark law. I also know that there are reasons that they choose to go this route but am not an expert as to all the ins and outs.That might be a subject to bring up for discussion with Harrington Law. Personally I wish the federal and state governments would get involved and bring criminal court charges as well
_________________ "Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain." Unknown "if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters." Lee McGuffey
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm Posts: 2593 Been Liked:294 times
A few years ago Party Tyme/Sybersound attempted to sue some other karaoke companies for unfair competition because they were able to sell their songs for less due to not obtaining licensing. The judge ruled that only the original copyright owner could sue for damages relating to copyright so Party Tyme was unable to proceed. I have always wondered if that left SC no other option but trademark.
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm Posts: 1636 Been Liked:73 times
Three green smileys?
_________________ "Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain." Unknown "if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters." Lee McGuffey
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 261 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
