|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Bazza
|
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2015 8:24 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
c. staley wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: Also, since all tracks will have individual embedded graphics, along with other tracking codes and passive security measures, we will be able to track any pirated copies to the source and take action. No, you won't.... It will be about as effective as MediaCloq was. Just like the GEM series was going to be "Instantly Pirated". Right? Five years. Nothing.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 12:05 am |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
In the Pep FAQ's" Pep website wrote: Who can make a Sound Choice Advance reservation? This program is available to Sound Choice Certified KJs, GEM Series Licensees, HELP Licensees, and verified Original Disc-Based KJs. If you don't fit one of those categories, now is the time to change that. We will check eligibility.
Can I reserve more than one set? How many sets do I need? We will enforce the same 1:1 correspondence requirement for this product as with all of our products. You need one set for each system you intend to put these tracks on. You will receive one downloadable Digital Album (8-12 tracks) for each set you reserve and pay for. Not that this matters, applies, or affects me, but, aren't the HELP Lincensees under a different set of rules, where they can be 1:x (x being any number of systems they may have in their operating rigs)?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 12:12 am |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
audioprola wrote: Does anyone know when new production will begin. Pep website wrote: The number of tracks will be determined based on the number of paid reservations the company receives before September 30, with a guaranteed minimum of 8 tracks. After the reservations period closes, those who made reservations will cast votes to influence the selection of songs to be produced.
The company will deliver the tracks within 1-2 months after the reservations period closes, subject to licensing and production considerations.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Smoothedge69
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 12:18 am |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am Posts: 3885 Images: 0 Been Liked: 397 times
|
This whole thing is a joke!! You are going to have a handful of host with new SC material. That is certainly NOT going to scare those who don't use SC. There are only so many new song releases on the radio, to make into Karaoke. So, those will already be covered, time and time again by SBI, Zoom, Part Tyme, and DTE. The quality of PT, ZM, AND SBI keeps getting better. Sorry, but after all this time, SC is just a name of an old company. I talk to A LOT of people, and most think SC is out of business. This new business model is NEVER going to make Kurt the kind of money he used to make, and that is speculating that there is even going to BE new production. Hey Kurt..........you blew it, throw in the damn towel already!! Let the BIG boys play now!! You are finished!!
_________________ I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE
|
|
Top |
|
|
jdmeister
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 7:08 am |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 4:12 pm Posts: 7703 Songs: 1 Location: Hollyweird, Ca. Been Liked: 1089 times
|
I dug through some boxes yesterday, guess what? Double handful of SC disks still in shrink wrap.. Maybe I'll post them up for sale.. Ask why that can happen, the answer is, "Impulse Buyer", sees a bargain, buys even though has the same item already.
|
|
Top |
|
|
jdmeister
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 7:09 am |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 4:12 pm Posts: 7703 Songs: 1 Location: Hollyweird, Ca. Been Liked: 1089 times
|
Smoothedge69 wrote: This whole thing is a joke!! You are going to have a handful of host with new SC material. That is certainly NOT going to scare those who don't use SC. There are only so many new song releases on the radio, to make into Karaoke. So, those will already be covered, time and time again by SBI, Zoom, Part Tyme, and DTE. The quality of PT, ZM, AND SBI keeps getting better. Sorry, but after all this time, SC is just a name of an old company. I talk to A LOT of people, and most think SC is out of business. This new business model is NEVER going to make Kurt the kind of money he used to make, and that is speculating that there is even going to BE new production. Hey Kurt..........you blew it, throw in the damn towel already!! Let the BIG boys play now!! You are finished!! Maybe Kurt needs to return to real estate speculation..
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 7:58 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
Bazza wrote: c. staley wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: Also, since all tracks will have individual embedded graphics, along with other tracking codes and passive security measures, we will be able to track any pirated copies to the source and take action. No, you won't.... It will be about as effective as MediaCloq was. Just like the GEM series was going to be "Instantly Pirated". Right? Five years. Nothing. Right... Because it's; (1) All "oldies" by today's standards and, (2) There is nothing on the "Blue label Gem" series that hasn't already been redistributed through a torrent site from the original "red label." So, there's really no point.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:54 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
c. staley wrote: Bazza wrote: Just like the GEM series was going to be "Instantly Pirated". Right? Five years. Nothing. Right... Because it's; (1) All "oldies" by today's standards and, (2) There is nothing on the "Blue label Gem" series that hasn't already been redistributed through a torrent site from the original "red label." So, there's really no point. If this were true, you'd only see ONE torrent of every movie on the net! I mean there is no point to pirating the BLU-RAY when the 1080i is already out there...right? And yet, there are dozens. Hundreds even of various qualities and configurations. Your post implies that nobody wants them, as the pirated red label songs already exist. This only proves you know nothing about the internet world of piracy. I can tell you, without a doubt, the complete GEM set would be the HOTTEST Karaoke torrent in years. Every disc? Every song? In MUCH better quality than what's out there now? C'mon Chip. Surely you can't be this naive? The reason the GEM set hasn't been pirated via Torrent or Usenet is ONLY because of their many security measures and the licensing agreement. IT HAS WORKED! For five years! I don't care who you are or what you think about Soundchoice. THAT is a monumental and undeniable victory in today's world. I guarantee you companies are taking note of the GEM success against piracy.
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 11:34 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
Bazza wrote: If this were true, you'd only see ONE torrent of every movie on the net! I mean there is no point to pirating the BLU-RAY when the 1080i is already out there...right? And yet, there are dozens. Hundreds even of various qualities and configurations. Apples to oranges. - remember? You don't need "higher resolution" and the only people that are really concerned even about bitrate -- are the KJ's. But a comparison to movies is ridiculous. Bazza wrote: Your post implies that nobody wants them, as the pirated red label songs already exist. This only proves you know nothing about the internet world of piracy. I can tell you, without a doubt, the complete GEM set would be the HOTTEST Karaoke torrent in years. Baloney. The stuff is already out there. And you are correct: I know nothing about the internet world of piracy -- because I'm not a pirate. But apparently, you and a whole host of cheerleaders know all the the in's and outs..... -- just sayin'. Bazza wrote: Every disc? Every song? In MUCH better quality than what's out there now? C'mon Chip. Surely you can't be this naive? Not naive at all, but actually a realist because "every disc" and "every song" is already out there. The only people that care about bitrate are the KJ's and nil to none of the patrons that come in really care. Bazza wrote: The reason the GEM set hasn't been pirated via Torrent or Usenet is ONLY because of their many security measures and the licensing agreement. IT HAS WORKED! For five years! Bwhahaha! The sad part about this is that you actually believe it. The real reason that it's not there is because there's no demand for it. There's nothing there that anyone wants. Bazza wrote: I don't care who you are or what you think about Soundchoice. THAT is a monumental and undeniable victory in today's world. I guarantee you companies are taking note of the GEM success against piracy. Yeah, it's legendary alright.... in your own mind. And that's the only place.
|
|
Top |
|
|
jclaydon
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 1:28 pm |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:16 pm Posts: 2027 Location: HIgh River, AB Been Liked: 268 times
|
c. staley wrote: Bazza wrote: If this were true, you'd only see ONE torrent of every movie on the net! I mean there is no point to pirating the BLU-RAY when the 1080i is already out there...right? And yet, there are dozens. Hundreds even of various qualities and configurations. Apples to oranges. - remember? You don't need "higher resolution" and the only people that are really concerned even about bitrate -- are the KJ's. But a comparison to movies is ridiculous. Bazza wrote: Your post implies that nobody wants them, as the pirated red label songs already exist. This only proves you know nothing about the internet world of piracy. I can tell you, without a doubt, the complete GEM set would be the HOTTEST Karaoke torrent in years. Baloney. The stuff is already out there. And you are correct: I know nothing about the internet world of piracy -- because I'm not a pirate. But apparently, you and a whole host of cheerleaders know all the the in's and outs..... -- just sayin'. Bazza wrote: Every disc? Every song? In MUCH better quality than what's out there now? C'mon Chip. Surely you can't be this naive? Not naive at all, but actually a realist because "every disc" and "every song" is already out there. The only people that care about bitrate are the KJ's and nil to none of the patrons that come in really care. Bazza wrote: The reason the GEM set hasn't been pirated via Torrent or Usenet is ONLY because of their many security measures and the licensing agreement. IT HAS WORKED! For five years! Bwhahaha! The sad part about this is that you actually believe it. The real reason that it's not there is because there's no demand for it. There's nothing there that anyone wants. Bazza wrote: I don't care who you are or what you think about Soundchoice. THAT is a monumental and undeniable victory in today's world. I guarantee you companies are taking note of the GEM success against piracy. Yeah, it's legendary alright.... in your own mind. And that's the only place. And this right here is EXACTLY why I posted the original message. I guess time will prove out whom is right. I know who I am putting my money on.
|
|
Top |
|
|
jclaydon
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 1:47 pm |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:16 pm Posts: 2027 Location: HIgh River, AB Been Liked: 268 times
|
On a slightly different but related note, initial piracy of any Advance tracks is going to require acess to either the master tracks, or a track that was purchased.
Let's just assume, for the sake of argument that it will not come from any users who have signed the license and purchased tracks.
That means the only other possibility is from the masters, which have to be hacked and any protection schemes removed. Not an impossible task, by any stretch of the imagination, but I would say it would require a level of skill that is beyond 80% of the people who use the internet.
That being said however, The ONLY way to prevent this 100% is to make sure that the master files are not connected to the internet, or a server of ANY kind.
But they want to deliver this files digitally which will require a connection to the internet.
My suggestion? Set up a specific time for each user thru skype and initiate a direct computer to computer file transfer. If these files are only connected to the internet while the file transfer is going on, since the hacker doesn't know where or when, it is is far less likely that someone will be able to hack the feed.
Just my 2 cents, for what it's worth
-James
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 3:01 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
c. staley wrote: Bazza wrote: Every disc? Every song? In MUCH better quality than what's out there now? C'mon Chip. Surely you can't be this naive? Not naive at all, but actually a realist because "every disc" and "every song" is already out there. The only people that care about bitrate are the KJ's and nil to none of the patrons that come in really care. also keep in mind, we are talking about pirates who are the ones who rip these songs in at 192. they don't see the need for higher bitrate and don't care enough to buy better quality.
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:13 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
jclaydon wrote: And this right here is EXACTLY why I posted the original message. I guess time will prove out whom is right. I know who I am putting my money on. Wait a frickin' second! "TIME WILL PROVE OUT WHO IS RIGHT?!" Are you f'in SERIOUS? Do you own a calendar? Can you tell time? IT'S BEEN FIVE YEARS!!! So, tell us. Are you putting your money on the people that, for five years, have said that the GEM set is evil? A bad business decision? A money losing proposition? A ruse? A scam? A sure way to screw your business? OR the guy who, after FIVE YEARS of using the product has just proven it isn't? How much time must elapse? PLEASE! We really wanna know! Paradigm Karaoke wrote: also keep in mind, we are talking about pirates who are the ones who rip these songs in at 192. they don't see the need for higher bitrate and don't care enough to buy better quality. The lame excuses you people come up with are absolutely comical! "Oh, pirates don't WANT better quality! Thieves don't know the difference! They are just a bunch of idiots!". They are HAPPY with their sh!tty quality bit-rates and f'ed up video you see. Keep dreaming gents. The tech savvy among us understand your 90's attitude. But hey! Don't stop believing! c. staley wrote: Apples to oranges. - remember? You don't need "higher resolution" and the only people that are really concerned even about bitrate -- are the KJ's. But a comparison to movies is ridiculous. Ridiculous, eh? Because movie thieves are more quality conscious than karaoke thieves? This whole line of thinking is antique. "Oh, pirates don't WANT better quality!". Well, that my friend is BULLSH!T. The pirates (aka F'ing THIEVES) are just like you and me. They want better quality songs and higher resolution. And if you were to give it to them for FREE, they would take it in a heartbeat! BUT IT HASN'T HAPPENED! Why?! Because of the GEM SET security features and the license agreement. AGAIN I SAY...this is unprecedented. Especially after FIVE YEARS! Bazza wrote: Your post implies that nobody wants them, as the pirated red label songs already exist. This only proves you know nothing about the internet world of piracy. I can tell you, without a doubt, the complete GEM set would be the HOTTEST Karaoke torrent in years. c. staley wrote: Baloney. The stuff is already out there. And you are correct: I know nothing about the internet world of piracy -- because I'm not a pirate. But apparently, you and a whole host of cheerleaders know all the the in's and outs..... -- just sayin'. Ah yes. The "guilty by knowledge" angle, also known as an "accessory" in legal terms. Because I understand and work with technology every day, I MUST BE A PIRATE! Gotcha! This is by far the lamest response I have ever seen from you. Honestly, I held you to higher debate standards than this. So. Back on target! You will notice dear readers that my old friend did not give ANY rebuttal to my point. He merely attempted to deflect my SPOT ON comment by committing character assassination and implying one MUST be a pirate if one understands technology. Well done! You will also notice that he admits to NOT UNDERSTANDING PIRACY TECHNOLOGY. You should take EVERY comment in the future with a grain of salt, as Mr. Staley has admitted he simply doesnt understand ANYTHING he is claiming to comprehend. Bazza wrote: Every disc? Every song? In MUCH better quality than what's out there now? C'mon Chip. Surely you can't be this naive? cstaley wrote: Not naive at all, but actually a realist because "every disc" and "every song" is already out there. The only people that care about bitrate are the KJ's and nil to none of the patrons that come in really care. I see. So this is your angle now? There has been no pirating of the best base set in karaoke history, because thieves have no desire for quality?! You casually dismissed my earlier movie analogy. Why? It's exactly the same. Why is it that movie pirates want BLU-RAY quality, but Karaoke pirates don't?! Why exactly are Karaoke thieves ecstatically happy with crappy quality? I'd love to know. But then again you have admitted to not understanding how it all works anyway. So why is it that we should believe you again? Bazza wrote: The reason the GEM set hasn't been pirated via Torrent or Usenet is ONLY because of their many security measures and the licensing agreement. IT HAS WORKED! For five years! cstaley wrote: Bwhahaha! The sad part about this is that you actually believe it. The real reason that it's not there is because there's no demand for it. There's nothing there that anyone wants. You know, there was a day when your cackles were believed by the less educated. When all you had to do was rant & scream and your minions would fall in line and back you up. But those days are gone, especially now that you admit you really don't understand the technology of piracy anyway. You have one option. GIVE US SOME EVIDENCE! It's been FIVE YEARS my dear friend! It's not me believing anything. This is not a religion. It's not about faith. I have FIVE YEARS of proof! How many years does it take?! Seven? Ten? Fifteen? C'mon. Are you seriously going to cling to your original argument after FIVE YEARS?! Give it up dude. You have been proven wrong. Not by me...but by TIME. Bazza wrote: I don't care who you are or what you think about Soundchoice. THAT is a monumental and undeniable victory in today's world. I guarantee you companies are taking note of the GEM success against piracy. cstaley wrote: Yeah, it's legendary alright.... in your own mind. And that's the only place. It's plainly obvious who is right and who is wrong here. You've lost your touch in your long absence. But hey. "Nice Try".
|
|
Top |
|
|
jclaydon
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 12:27 am |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:16 pm Posts: 2027 Location: HIgh River, AB Been Liked: 268 times
|
all I can add at this point is that I REALLY REALLY hope that PEP is able to keep to its three month release schedule *end of September plus two months* I will be really nice to have some definitive proof to rub in the naysayers faces Altho I guess there is the slim chance I will be eating crow. My guess is we will know one way or the other within two months after the first new release. Consdering that the red label tracks usually were pirated within the first week of release, I would say that is more than enough time for definitive proof. hope you all brought popcorn -James
|
|
Top |
|
|
jclaydon
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 12:54 am |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:16 pm Posts: 2027 Location: HIgh River, AB Been Liked: 268 times
|
Bazza wrote: jclaydon wrote: And this right here is EXACTLY why I posted the original message. I guess time will prove out whom is right. I know who I am putting my money on. Wait a frickin' second! "TIME WILL PROVE OUT WHO IS RIGHT?!" Are you f'in SERIOUS? Do you own a calendar? Can you tell time? IT'S BEEN FIVE YEARS!!! So, tell us. Are you putting your money on the people that, for five years, have said that the GEM set is evil? A bad business decision? A money losing proposition? A ruse? A scam? A sure way to screw your business? OR the guy who, after FIVE YEARS of using the product has just proven it isn't? How much time must elapse? PLEASE! We really wanna know! [: Bazza When I said 'time will tell' I meant in regards to the ADVANCE series. The release of these tracks will offer incontrovertible, undeniable proof so that people can't use the lame excuse of "It's because it's already available" All it's going to take is ONE song that has never ever been released on karaoke then we will absolutely know the truth once and for all. For the record, my money is on I won't be seeing any advance tracks on the torrent after release. There is NO way someone would pay that much money for new music and risk a lawsuit just to stick it to a karaoke producer, I could of course be wrong, but I seriously doubt it. After all, a long while back I think I remember seeing someone post that their gem series was stolen,, and they STILL haven't shown up on the torrents. That says to me that they either didn't know what they had stolen, or they didn't want to get caught.. -James Again, i'm hoping that I will find out in about three months or so
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 5:59 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
jclaydon wrote: When I said 'time will tell' I meant in regards to the ADVANCE series. The release of these tracks will offer incontrovertible, undeniable proof so that people can't use the lame excuse of "It's because it's already available" Ahhh, I get it now. Brilliant! jclaydon wrote: All it's going to take is ONE song that has never ever been released on karaoke then we will absolutely know the truth once and for all. For the record, my money is on I won't be seeing any advance tracks on the torrent after release. Yup. jclaydon wrote: There is NO way someone would pay that much money for new music and risk a lawsuit just to stick it to a karaoke producer, I could of course be wrong, but I seriously doubt it. I don't think the money has anything to do with it. It's the fact that they WILL get caught, and thus be legally liable. jclaydon wrote: After all, a long while back I think I remember seeing someone post that their gem series was stolen,, and they STILL haven't shown up on the torrents. I forgot about that. It was an evil roomate or some such, right?
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 9:22 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
Bazza wrote: c. staley wrote: Apples to oranges. - remember? You don't need "higher resolution" and the only people that are really concerned even about bitrate -- are the KJ's. But a comparison to movies is ridiculous. Ridiculous, eh? Because movie thieves are more quality conscious than karaoke thieves? This whole line of thinking is antique. "Oh, pirates don't WANT better quality!". Well, that my friend is BULLSH!T. The pirates (aka F'ing THIEVES) are just like you and me. They want better quality songs and higher resolution. And if you were to give it to them for FREE, they would take it in a heartbeat! BUT IT HASN'T HAPPENED! Why?! Because of the GEM SET security features and the license agreement. "Higher resolution?" Really? For graphics made up of 8x8 bitmapped text? Have you been drinking or are you really that ignorant of what makes up karaoke graphics? Bazza wrote: Your post implies that nobody wants them, as the pirated red label songs already exist. This only proves you know nothing about the internet world of piracy. I can tell you, without a doubt, the complete GEM set would be the HOTTEST Karaoke torrent in years. c. staley wrote: Baloney. The stuff is already out there. And you are correct: I know nothing about the internet world of piracy -- because I'm not a pirate. But apparently, you and a whole host of cheerleaders know all the the in's and outs..... -- just sayin'. There, I highlighted what you MISREAD. How did "know nothing about the internet world of piracy" Suddenly become "I know nothing of the TECHNOLOGY of piracy?" Figures you would misinterpret and twist to suit your on-going rant: Bazza wrote: You will also notice that he admits to NOT UNDERSTANDING PIRACY TECHNOLOGY. You should take EVERY comment in the future with a grain of salt, as Mr. Staley has admitted he simply doesn't understand ANYTHING he is claiming to comprehend. Obviously, you have (among other life challenges) reading comprehension problem because I understand "the technology" just fine. You just wallow in the words you've attempted to put in my mouth... to further your agenda. When I say "technology" I mean that I do not have any of the techonology: I do not have any IRQ software, P2P software or any of the technological tools.... because I have no need for them. cstaley wrote: Not naive at all, but actually a realist because "every disc" and "every song" is already out there. The only people that care about bitrate are the KJ's and nil to none of the patrons that come in really care. Bazza wrote: I see. So this is your angle now? There has been no pirating of the best base set in karaoke history, because thieves have no desire for quality?! You casually dismissed my earlier movie analogy. Why? It's exactly the same. Why is it that movie pirates want BLU-RAY quality, but Karaoke pirates don't?! Why exactly are Karaoke thieves ecstatically happy with crappy quality? I'd love to know.
But then again you have admitted to not understanding how it all works anyway. So why is it that we should believe you again? Read my lips: There has been no need to pirate the gem set because all those songs have already been pirated from your brand -- and contrary to your belief, most pirates that download it obviously don't care about the differences between 128 and 320 when it comes to bitrate because they are just like the patrons: They don't care as long as they have "the song." Bazza wrote: You know, there was a day when your cackles were believed by the less educated. When all you had to do was rant & scream and your minions would fall in line and back you up. But those days are gone, especially now that you admit you really don't understand the technology of piracy anyway. You have one option. GIVE US SOME EVIDENCE! It's been FIVE YEARS my dear friend! It's not me believing anything. This is not a religion. It's not about faith. I have FIVE YEARS of proof! How many years does it take?! Seven? Ten? Fifteen? Once again, (and contrary to your spewing) the gem set of oldies is nothing that can't be pirated off the red label... and already has been.... capish? So why would anyone on the planet want it? Even after 5 years? or 6 years, or 20 years? It's easy to say; no one wants my blue toy... because it's special... when the truth is that everyone already has a red one. But keep on telling yourself that fib... it's easier for you to believe it. I would only agree with you if the same songs weren't already out on the red label.... but they are so once again, you're just howling at moon and don't realize how dumb you look. Bazza wrote: It's plainly obvious who is right and who is wrong here. You've lost your touch in your long absence. Not at all. You're desperately flailing about... hoping that someone will believe the same old story you've been repeating for 5 years.... But it won't matter if you end up repeating it for the next 20 years, it won't change the fact that every song on the gem has already been redistributed -- even before the gem was wrongfully produced. But what has happened in the last 5 years is that the very company that leased you this product is out of business, (gone, as in kaput) the lease picked up by their successor who holds "the paper." And 5 years later, I'm still in business..... Bet you didn't see that coming!
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 9:47 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
Was somebody trying to put you out of business?
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 10:22 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: Was somebody trying to put you out of business? Nope... I didn't even transfer assets and explode into dust and ashes... (Like Slep-Tone did.) BTW; did you send out legal notices to all the Slep-Tone licensees that PEP was a successor and that they should send their payments to you?
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 10:48 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
c. staley wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: Was somebody trying to put you out of business? Nope... I didn't even transfer assets and explode into dust and ashes... (Like Slep-Tone did.) No, you just scaled back your operations by 80% when you realized you might get sued, then spent the next six years whining about how much wrong we were doing. c. staley wrote: BTW; did you send out legal notices to all the Slep-Tone licensees that PEP was a successor and that they should send their payments to you? And now we know Mr. Staley's flavor of the week for this week. Hmmm...still bitter, I see. Since you're not a licensee, I guess you're condemned forever not to know, because what happens between us and our licensees is between us and our licensees.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 261 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|