|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
jclaydon
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 6:00 am |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:16 pm Posts: 2027 Location: HIgh River, AB Been Liked: 268 times
|
cueball wrote: Bazza wrote: How many GEM torrents have there been in the last 4.5 years? ZERO. How many GEM knockoffs have been on eBay on the last 4.5 years? ZERO. How many hard drive sellers have GEM songs on their drives? ZERO.
And how many GEM Songs are NEW-NEVER-BEFORE-RELEASED-SONG-TRACKS - ZERO! So, what's your point Bazza? All the SC material that exists is ALREADY OUT THERE on Torrents sites and in Hard Drive sales. So, in other words, What's in the GEM series is already out there in a previous life. What point are you trying to make? The point is no one has stolen the actual tracks which are BETTER quality and 100% perfect graphics which 99.9% of the torrents are not. If you are going to go to the trouble of stealing something, you might as well get the best version you can get. It wouldn't be that hard to put the actual tracks on mirc or a torrent, but because they are watermarked and traceable, no one in their right mind would. And no one has.
|
|
Top |
|
|
mckyj57
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 7:05 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm Posts: 5576 Location: Cocoa Beach Been Liked: 122 times
|
jclaydon wrote: mckyj57 wrote: jclaydon wrote: A copy protection scheme does not have to be unbreakable, that is absolutely impossible. All it has to do, is make it so that it is easier to pay for material than it is to steal it. That was true in the days of distributed "cracks" as the way to get at pirated medis. Nowadays, the crack is done for you; you never "crack" the media, you download copies from various places. Repeat after me -- there are no hard-media copy protection schemes in use at this time. Nor are there likely to be any. I never said anything about hard media, that was Joe. I am talking more about the current protection schemes that require you to connect to the website in order to renew or validate your license. Exactly like digitrax and the karaoke cloud does. You have to connect every single month in order to keep using the tracks. That's streaming, not media, and it is completely different. Quote: In that senario, it is a hell of a lot easier to just keep paying than to crack the files, or to try to find a source for them. The way you pirate streams is by grabbing the stream. It isn't impossible at all. If it is going to output audio and video, at some point you can hijack it. It isn't done now because there is no streaming-only content and hard media is what is pirated. But if there were no hard media to hijack, you can bet that there would be people hijacking the streams and the graphics and producing MP4 and AVI karaoke files. None of those things have anything to do with copy protection.
_________________ [color=#ffff55]Mickey J.[/color] Alas for those who never sing, but die with all their music in them. -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:41 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
jclaydon wrote: cueball wrote: Bazza wrote: How many GEM torrents have there been in the last 4.5 years? ZERO. How many GEM knockoffs have been on eBay on the last 4.5 years? ZERO. How many hard drive sellers have GEM songs on their drives? ZERO.
And how many GEM Songs are NEW-NEVER-BEFORE-RELEASED-SONG-TRACKS - ZERO! So, what's your point Bazza? All the SC material that exists is ALREADY OUT THERE on Torrents sites and in Hard Drive sales. So, in other words, What's in the GEM series is already out there in a previous life. What point are you trying to make? The point is no one has stolen the actual tracks which are BETTER quality and 100% perfect graphics which 99.9% of the torrents are not. If you are going to go to the trouble of stealing something, you might as well get the best version you can get. It wouldn't be that hard to put the actual tracks on mirc or a torrent, but because they are watermarked and traceable, no one in their right mind would. And no one has. Exactly. Thank You.
|
|
Top |
|
|
mckyj57
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:41 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm Posts: 5576 Location: Cocoa Beach Been Liked: 122 times
|
Bazza wrote: jclaydon wrote: cueball wrote: Bazza wrote: How many GEM torrents have there been in the last 4.5 years? ZERO. How many GEM knockoffs have been on eBay on the last 4.5 years? ZERO. How many hard drive sellers have GEM songs on their drives? ZERO.
And how many GEM Songs are NEW-NEVER-BEFORE-RELEASED-SONG-TRACKS - ZERO! So, what's your point Bazza? All the SC material that exists is ALREADY OUT THERE on Torrents sites and in Hard Drive sales. So, in other words, What's in the GEM series is already out there in a previous life. What point are you trying to make? The point is no one has stolen the actual tracks which are BETTER quality and 100% perfect graphics which 99.9% of the torrents are not. If you are going to go to the trouble of stealing something, you might as well get the best version you can get. It wouldn't be that hard to put the actual tracks on mirc or a torrent, but because they are watermarked and traceable, no one in their right mind would. And no one has. Exactly. Thank You. Apparently there also have not been any stolen drives or disk sets (at least by someone who knew what they stole).
_________________ [color=#ffff55]Mickey J.[/color] Alas for those who never sing, but die with all their music in them. -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 2:07 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
The GEM really is the best method of making it easily identifiable as to the real owner and if it's stolen. ally that to new music downloads and it would help in the future. I'm sure there is a way to add that watermark with a name to the cdg file at the time of download.
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 2:58 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
Paradigm Karaoke wrote: yes, you can steal anything you want from SC and will not be sued if you pay $200 a month. the publishers will get none of that money and you will still be breaking the law, but SC...or PEP will do the right thing and keep quiet not telling the publishers about you....exactly what they wanted you NOT TO DO BEFORE. So why wasn't there any hate for Stellar and their CAP program which is EXACTLY what you describe?(except it was a one time fee instead of monthly)
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 5:04 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
because there were no other expectations. SC has touted that wrong is wrong and tried to keep the integrity of what they were attempting to do in the forefront of it while calling on our morals to do the right thing and report theft. Stellar never made such expectations. it is not WHAT SC is doing that i have the issue with. if you know of piracy, the right thing to do was report it, unless you are SC then it is not your problem to report piracy. it's the double standard again.
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
doowhatchulike
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 5:54 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am Posts: 752 Images: 1 Been Liked: 73 times
|
Paradigm Karaoke wrote: because there were no other expectations. SC has touted that wrong is wrong and tried to keep the integrity of what they were attempting to do in the forefront of it while calling on our morals to do the right thing and report theft. Stellar never made such expectations. it is not WHAT SC is doing that i have the issue with. if you know of piracy, the right thing to do was report it, unless you are SC then it is not your problem to report piracy. it's the double standard again. Does it further chap your hide that they chose the name of your fair city for the "new" company name???
|
|
Top |
|
|
CafeBar
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 3:01 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 9:21 pm Posts: 245 Been Liked: 95 times
|
doowhatchulike wrote: Does it further chap your hide that they chose the name of your fair city for the "new" company name??? Given the circumstances, I'm going to make a wild-assed guess that it might have been named after the mythical bird that rises from the ashes, not after the city. I could be wrong. Also, St. Paul's Cathedral isn't named after St. Paul, Minnesota.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 4:40 am |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
doowhatchulike wrote: Does it further chap your hide that they chose the name of your fair city for the "new" company name??? nah, i see where they were going with it and i would probably do the same. if it works, a phoenix would be a great analogy.
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
doowhatchulike
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 6:33 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am Posts: 752 Images: 1 Been Liked: 73 times
|
CafeBar wrote: doowhatchulike wrote: Does it further chap your hide that they chose the name of your fair city for the "new" company name??? Given the circumstances, I'm going to make a wild-assed guess that it might have been named after the mythical bird that rises from the ashes, not after the city. I could be wrong. Also, St. Paul's Cathedral isn't named after St. Paul, Minnesota. Please note post #19 on this page, to see that way before now, I noted this very thing: viewtopic.php?f=26&t=31328Also, there is a very good chance that the CITY Phoenix was named after the mythical bird, which would, by association, make my statement (though always meant to be tongue-in-cheek) valid...
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lone Wolf
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 11:37 am |
|
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:11 am Posts: 1832 Location: TX Been Liked: 59 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: doowhatchulike wrote: I want to apologize if my interest in this came across as being "frustrated",
No, actually, it came across more as you being a dick about it. Did I read this right? An officer of the court called someone a DICK in an open forum? And yet he has not been chastised by Admin or others? I have seen people banned for less.
_________________ I like everyone when I first meet them. If you don't like me that's not my problem it's YOURS! A stranger is a friend you haven't met yet
|
|
Top |
|
|
CafeBar
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 12:23 pm |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 9:21 pm Posts: 245 Been Liked: 95 times
|
doowhatchulike wrote: CafeBar wrote: doowhatchulike wrote: Does it further chap your hide that they chose the name of your fair city for the "new" company name??? Given the circumstances, I'm going to make a wild-assed guess that it might have been named after the mythical bird that rises from the ashes, not after the city. I could be wrong. Also, St. Paul's Cathedral isn't named after St. Paul, Minnesota. Please note post #19 on this page, to see that way before now, I noted this very thing: viewtopic.php?f=26&t=31328 Thanks for clearing that up. I did notice on that other thread you already had two more posts pointing out to other people that you thought of it first. Guys, can we all chip in and buy this guy a special ribbon or something?
|
|
Top |
|
|
mrmarog
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 1:10 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:13 pm Posts: 3801 Images: 1 Location: Florida Been Liked: 1612 times
|
mrmarog wrote: Since we are just "speculating".......How about a CAP, like Stellar tried? It could be to the benefit of everyone including the "rights holders". Actually especially the rights holders, if it was set up with that in mind. It seems as though I might have been the closest of the speculators... minus the new ownership twist.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:52 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
jclaydon wrote: cueball wrote: Bazza wrote: How many GEM torrents have there been in the last 4.5 years? ZERO. How many GEM knockoffs have been on eBay on the last 4.5 years? ZERO. How many hard drive sellers have GEM songs on their drives? ZERO.
And how many GEM Songs are NEW-NEVER-BEFORE-RELEASED-SONG-TRACKS - ZERO! So, what's your point Bazza? All the SC material that exists is ALREADY OUT THERE on Torrents sites and in Hard Drive sales. So, in other words, What's in the GEM series is already out there in a previous life. What point are you trying to make? The point is no one has stolen the actual tracks which are BETTER quality and 100% perfect graphics which 99.9% of the torrents are not. If you are going to go to the trouble of stealing something, you might as well get the best version you can get. It wouldn't be that hard to put the actual tracks on mirc or a torrent, but because they are watermarked and traceable, no one in their right mind would. And no one has. The SC catalogue was offered on line legitimately (SC original tracks) 2 or 3 times for short periods ( Stingray may still be offering them in Canada, not sure..). What makes you so sure THOSE tracks have not been pirated. Personally, I am certain that they have. What would have stopped that from happening?
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
jclaydon
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:45 pm |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:16 pm Posts: 2027 Location: HIgh River, AB Been Liked: 268 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: jclaydon wrote: cueball wrote: Bazza wrote: How many GEM torrents have there been in the last 4.5 years? ZERO. How many GEM knockoffs have been on eBay on the last 4.5 years? ZERO. How many hard drive sellers have GEM songs on their drives? ZERO.
And how many GEM Songs are NEW-NEVER-BEFORE-RELEASED-SONG-TRACKS - ZERO! So, what's your point Bazza? All the SC material that exists is ALREADY OUT THERE on Torrents sites and in Hard Drive sales. So, in other words, What's in the GEM series is already out there in a previous life. What point are you trying to make? The point is no one has stolen the actual tracks which are BETTER quality and 100% perfect graphics which 99.9% of the torrents are not. If you are going to go to the trouble of stealing something, you might as well get the best version you can get. It wouldn't be that hard to put the actual tracks on mirc or a torrent, but because they are watermarked and traceable, no one in their right mind would. And no one has. The SC catalogue was offered on line legitimately (SC original tracks) 2 or 3 times for short periods ( Stingray may still be offering them in Canada, not sure..). What makes you so sure THOSE tracks have not been pirated. Personally, I am certain that they have. What would have stopped that from happening? They problably have been.. The difference, is that to the best of my knowledge no one has made them available for public consumption. How can i be so sure? Because I have downloaded from these torrents and mirc before. I used to do it all the time before i was a host. If i wanted to, i know EXACTLY where to go, and how to get the songs i want. And you know what the weird thing is, I went back about a year ago to see if things have changed much. They haven't.. people are still posting NEW stuff at 128k because they don't know any better. The only high quality files that are available to torrent that i know of are from someone who actually bought a track from karaokeversion and then just uploaded it -James
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2015 12:41 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
jclaydon wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: jclaydon wrote: cueball wrote: Bazza wrote: How many GEM torrents have there been in the last 4.5 years? ZERO. How many GEM knockoffs have been on eBay on the last 4.5 years? ZERO. How many hard drive sellers have GEM songs on their drives? ZERO.
And how many GEM Songs are NEW-NEVER-BEFORE-RELEASED-SONG-TRACKS - ZERO! So, what's your point Bazza? All the SC material that exists is ALREADY OUT THERE on Torrents sites and in Hard Drive sales. So, in other words, What's in the GEM series is already out there in a previous life. What point are you trying to make? The point is no one has stolen the actual tracks which are BETTER quality and 100% perfect graphics which 99.9% of the torrents are not. If you are going to go to the trouble of stealing something, you might as well get the best version you can get. It wouldn't be that hard to put the actual tracks on mirc or a torrent, but because they are watermarked and traceable, no one in their right mind would. And no one has. The SC catalogue was offered on line legitimately (SC original tracks) 2 or 3 times for short periods ( Stingray may still be offering them in Canada, not sure..). What makes you so sure THOSE tracks have not been pirated. Personally, I am certain that they have. What would have stopped that from happening? They problably have been.. The difference, is that to the best of my knowledge ( My Emboldens - J.C.) no one has made them available for public consumption. How can i be so sure? Because I have downloaded from these torrents and mirc before. I used to do it all the time before i was a host. -James Anyone who hacked the sites I mentioned would have no reason to put them on the sites that you mentioned. That doesn't mean the HD sellers don't offer them, or that other sites don't have them. We will have to agree to disagree.
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:04 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
It wouldn't be too difficult to take the 320k GEM rips and replace the graphics with red label graphics. Will save a lot of time in creating the base 320k, artifact free torrents that will inevitably show up because of the HELP program.
I know I joked about it before, but there might be an opportunity to make some money on the side selling access to "a collection of Sound Choice music that meets the strict qualifications of the PEP HELP program".
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
doowhatchulike
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 10:55 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am Posts: 752 Images: 1 Been Liked: 73 times
|
CafeBar wrote: doowhatchulike wrote: CafeBar wrote: doowhatchulike wrote: Does it further chap your hide that they chose the name of your fair city for the "new" company name??? Given the circumstances, I'm going to make a wild-assed guess that it might have been named after the mythical bird that rises from the ashes, not after the city. I could be wrong. Also, St. Paul's Cathedral isn't named after St. Paul, Minnesota. Please note post #19 on this page, to see that way before now, I noted this very thing: viewtopic.php?f=26&t=31328 Thanks for clearing that up. I did notice on that other thread you already had two more posts pointing out to other people that you thought of it first. Guys, can we all chip in and buy this guy a special ribbon or something? As many can agree, especially those in a legal profession, words (and the occasional emoticon) are all that can be used in a forum such as this to portray one's thoughts on a subject. Therefore, the choosing of those words is tantamount to this experience. That being said: One cannot claim to make a "wild assed guess" and "notice on that other thread" a prior posting, both at the same time. If it was noticed to have already been suggested, restating it has no logical purpose. Situations like this could cause one to conclude that minimal reading and comprehension skills were not utilized initially. All obvious sarcasm aside, you are welcome for me clearing that up, and everyone chipping in and buying me anything would certainly be welcomed and appreciated...
|
|
Top |
|
|
jclaydon
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 3:32 pm |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:16 pm Posts: 2027 Location: HIgh River, AB Been Liked: 268 times
|
chrisavis wrote: It wouldn't be too difficult to take the 320k GEM rips and replace the graphics with red label graphics. Will save a lot of time in creating the base 320k, artifact free torrents that will inevitably show up because of the HELP program.
I know I joked about it before, but there might be an opportunity to make some money on the side selling access to "a collection of Sound Choice music that meets the strict qualifications of the PEP HELP program". Even if i had a set of GEM discs to do this with, there is no way in hell i would risk it. All of the music from the GEM series is watermarked and traceable, so if those files are ever analysed with the proper software, that person would know EXACTLY where the files came from -James
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 256 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|