KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - Is Sound Choice Helping Zoom & Sunfly? Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Fri Jan 03, 2025 11:20 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 6:28 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:35 am
Posts: 691
Location: Carson City, NV
Been Liked: 0 time
c. staley wrote:
Wall Of Sound wrote:
"Since investigators for Sound Choice discovered a growing level of Sunfly Karaoke, Zoom Entertainment and Mr. Entertainer songs being played, they are in discussions with these UK companies to represent their Intellectual Property interests in the U.S., with possible lawsuits for these brands in the future."

From the Northwest Karaoke Guide featuring Sound Choice's press release about the Washington State lawsuits on page 13.

http://www.themedallion.net/publicftp/2 ... 207-11.pdf

Speculation and hearsay...


Yeah, you have proven that you know A LOT about spreading speculation & hearsay for sure!

viewtopic.php?f=26&t=21497&p=299426#p299426

_________________
"Just Say NO, To Justin Bieber & His Beatle Haircut"


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 6:39 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
Wall Of Sound wrote:
c. staley wrote:
Wall Of Sound wrote:
"Since investigators for Sound Choice discovered a growing level of Sunfly Karaoke, Zoom Entertainment and Mr. Entertainer songs being played, they are in discussions with these UK companies to represent their Intellectual Property interests in the U.S., with possible lawsuits for these brands in the future."

From the Northwest Karaoke Guide featuring Sound Choice's press release about the Washington State lawsuits on page 13.

http://www.themedallion.net/publicftp/2 ... 207-11.pdf

Speculation and hearsay...


Yeah, you have proven that you know A LOT about spreading speculation & hearsay for sure!

viewtopic.php?f=26&t=21497&p=299426#p299426

Let's remember who's "spreading" this now....it's you.

(Now that's insane!)


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:04 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
Wall Of Sound wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
I already answered and gave the differences several times in this thread and others, and explained why downloads are not originals at least as many times, with as much clarity as humanly possible. If you don't get it, you don't get it. If you wish to ignore, please do. Not my problem- that's the business.

I have also discussed how the manufacturers feel about having to own - in their own words- " Original Fixed Media" several times. I have noted the word FIXED in that phrase.

What I'm seeing is WOS skipping what he can't explain, and maybe throwing Paradigm - normally a sensible guy- off with it.

Again, If you don't get it, you don't get it. If you wish to ignore it, please do. Not my problem- that's the business.


And all this from a guy who uses unlicensed SuperCore CDG discs at his show.


...and also has enough sense to limit business liability by using original mfrs.' discs?

As opposed to a guy would WOULD use SC product that is only possibly licensed in the UK, and not in the U.S.? Who pays licensing fees to said mfr. anyway? Who then copies it to a PC and hopes said mfr. leaves him alone?

Yup, I'll take using Supercore discs anytime...

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:46 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
We will probably never see eye to eye on this one Joe.
i don't understand.....SC licensed the discs through MCPS, who paid the publishers and song writers, like Moonrider, the money they desirve and that is bad because they did not get U.S. licenses for it, but Supercore who told the publishers and song writers like Moonrider to shove it sideways up their azz and paid nothing to anyone, THAT is ok to use?

And as far as the last posts we had, i understand what you are saying about using the disc as opposed to using the PC copy. what i don't see is where you got the info that the manus lose liability of it once it gets transfered to computer. "Because Joe Charteuse said so" is as far as it has gotten, but you got that information somewhere to make the business decision you did, let me see what you saw, i am not opposed to changing my business model with new information, but as i am sure you would understand, i would prefer to base it on more than one guys say so. I was just asking to be able to base my decision on the same information you saw. you have given me no reason to think you a liar, in fact i believe that is the farthest from the truth for you, but i even double check my own parents information. trust but verify.

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 12:39 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
We will probably never see eye to eye on this one Joe.


1) i don't understand.....SC licensed the discs through MCPS, who paid the publishers and song writers, like Moonrider, the money they desirve and that is bad because they did not get U.S. licenses for it, but Supercore who told the publishers and song writers like Moonrider to shove it sideways up their azz and paid nothing to anyone, THAT is ok to use?

2) And as far as the last posts we had, i understand what you are saying about using the disc as opposed to using the PC copy. what i don't see is where you got the info that the manus lose liability of it once it gets transfered to computer. .


Paradigm, you have my full respect at all times, and I never took any post from you personally. I have, however, added Wall to the Thunder section on "ignore".

Since it's you, I will post it again. What has been happening is that there has been a misunderstanding constantly perpetuated by Wall for baiting purposes.

1) I don't say, nor have I ever said, that Supercore is any less "bad" or "better" than SC in regard to licensing. That's Wall twisting the issue. I have stated that as far as licensing in the U.S. - per Kurt's own statements on the forums- that they are on EQUAL footing. In other words, SC is in the same boat as SuperCore, or All Hits, or Dangerous, if they have no more U.S. licensing than they do.

My only gripe with SC's lack of U.S. licensing is their GALL in demanding licensing fees for said non- U.S. licensed product. It's ridiculous!

I DO say that by running these manufacturers' original discs, I deflect any monetary liability back to the manufacturer.

I say this because in essence, Moonrider is absolutely correct. If the OWNERS of the music were to get involved they would in liklihood find all hosts to be pirates in their eyes- as MOST of the mfrs. in any KJs collection have run into licensing difficulties.

However, I never claimed sainthood- I'm running a business. Until the OWNERS tell me to cease and desist, I will continue to do so and limit my liability to the best of my ability

2) This is more difficult to explain, and when I did so, it was a lot for a 2 finger typist, so this time I'll keep it light.

MP3 discs copied to PC: While I have conceded that this may still be a gray area, the manufacturers have not. They use "Trademark Infringement" as a hook, and claim that any PC host who has it displayed from their computer is showing a counterfeit copy. They may agree not to sue if the KJ has all the discs, but the fact remains that THEY consider it a counterfeit COPY, because it's not the original. I may or may not agree with this, but if one were to carry it to it's logical conclusion, this would mean that the CONTENT is not the original either. If that's the case, then that would mean they are no longer liable for it- it's your counterfeit copy.

I don't necessarily see it that way. However, I DO know that each copy of an original is slightly different than the original ( varying skills of different people running the PC, different software, varying levels of PC quality, etc, etc.) - and therefore can't BE the original.

Also, if you are ripping CDGs to MP3s you are deleteing audio data. There's no question that THAT is no longer the original. Which brings me to:

Downloads: Adding to all of the variables from the consumer end above we have AT LEAST two transmissions of data, upload and download. There is ALWAYS some loss or detriment in transmissions whether noticeable or not. I mean, some folks still download via dial up too!

All changes made at the mfrs. ( such as media shift) are still the manufactures', but any changes afterward ( and there always are) make the download the property of the end user.

Add to that more producer stuff, which I may or may not agree with. They speak of the neccesity of owning the "Original FIXED Media". Downloads are not fixed media. They are a transmitted data stream ( with all the pitfalls of the above) copy of a media shifted original.

No karaoke track producer can, or would want to guarantee that what ends up in your PC is an exact duplicate of the original. How could they ever know? In some way or another, through the entire process, there has been SOME alteration. This is what would give them the legal out in court, per my IP guys. The producers have no liability for download content. It simply physically is not the original. They RETAIN the original. They don't make a new one for each download.

Could my IP guys be wrong after 30 years with me in the engineering design biz? Sure, another law team could argue differently, but I trust the folks I know. They win a lot.

Now, you have asked for a link of some sort. Any good math teacher will tell you that you can't prove a negative, but CAN prove a positive.

Try getting ANY download mfr. to document and send to you a statement saying unequivocally that their tracks are specifically licensed from the music owners for use in a U.S. based karaoke show.

They should, without much cost or effort, and just like a receipt of payment, be able to do so with each track.

But they won't.

Until that happens, my negative stands.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Last edited by JoeChartreuse on Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 6:56 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am
Posts: 1066
Location: Madison VA
Been Liked: 0 time
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
We will probably never see eye to eye on this one Joe.
i don't understand.....SC licensed the discs through MCPS, who paid the publishers and song writers, like Moonrider, the money they desirve and that is bad because they did not get U.S. licenses for it, but Supercore who told the publishers and song writers like Moonrider to shove it sideways up their azz and paid nothing to anyone, THAT is ok to use?

And as far as the last posts we had, i understand what you are saying about using the disc as opposed to using the PC copy. what i don't see is where you got the info that the manus lose liability of it once it gets transfered to computer. "Because Joe Charteuse said so" is as far as it has gotten, but you got that information somewhere to make the business decision you did, let me see what you saw, i am not opposed to changing my business model with new information, but as i am sure you would understand, i would prefer to base it on more than one guys say so. I was just asking to be able to base my decision on the same information you saw. you have given me no reason to think you a liar, in fact i believe that is the farthest from the truth for you, but i even double check my own parents information. trust but verify.


There is no need to ask Joe to show you, because he can't! He has stated several time that "Kurt said" that SC does not have U.S. licensing (and I am sure without ever looking at his post he will say so again) but he will never show that to you, again because he can't.

On the other hand I said that "Kurt said" that SC product is licensed for use in the U.S. and I have shown you!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:15 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:35 am
Posts: 691
Location: Carson City, NV
Been Liked: 0 time
Thunder wrote:
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
We will probably never see eye to eye on this one Joe.
i don't understand.....SC licensed the discs through MCPS, who paid the publishers and song writers, like Moonrider, the money they desirve and that is bad because they did not get U.S. licenses for it, but Supercore who told the publishers and song writers like Moonrider to shove it sideways up their azz and paid nothing to anyone, THAT is ok to use?

And as far as the last posts we had, i understand what you are saying about using the disc as opposed to using the PC copy. what i don't see is where you got the info that the manus lose liability of it once it gets transfered to computer. "Because Joe Charteuse said so" is as far as it has gotten, but you got that information somewhere to make the business decision you did, let me see what you saw, i am not opposed to changing my business model with new information, but as i am sure you would understand, i would prefer to base it on more than one guys say so. I was just asking to be able to base my decision on the same information you saw. you have given me no reason to think you a liar, in fact i believe that is the farthest from the truth for you, but i even double check my own parents information. trust but verify.


There is no need to ask Joe to show you, because he can't! He has stated several time that "Kurt said" that SC does not have U.S. licensing (and I am sure without ever looking at his post he will say so again) but he will never show that to you, again because he can't.

On the other hand I said that "Kurt said" that SC product is licensed for use in the U.S. and I have shown you!


But then again remember Thunder that Joe knows everything.

_________________
"Just Say NO, To Justin Bieber & His Beatle Haircut"


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 4:44 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
Thunder wrote:
On the other hand I said that "Kurt said" that SC product is licensed for use in the U.S. and I have shown you!

I don't remember Thunder showing anything and even I'd like to see that.... Especially since Thunder never "shows" anything to substantiate what he says....

Wall Of Sound: Please repost what Thunder has "shown"....


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:25 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
c. staley wrote:
Thunder wrote:
On the other hand I said that "Kurt said" that SC product is licensed for use in the U.S. and I have shown you!

I don't remember Thunder showing anything and even I'd like to see that.... Especially since Thunder never "shows" anything to substantiate what he says....

Wall Of Sound: Please repost what Thunder has "shown"....


Chip, since you quoted Thunder, I can see his post. Please allow me:

One must be careful when reading what Thunder writes. "Kurt said that SC product is licensed for use in the U.S." is, in my opinion, a DELIBERATELY incomplete statement by Thunder for baiting purposes. Let me explain:

Assuming that SC was licensed in the UK, and legally sold the product manufactured there by MediaPlas in the U.S., then
like UK downloads, they are perfectly legal to use in the U.S.- but ONLY FOR HOME USERS.. Kurt would not say otherwise- not good business.

I have my difficulties with Kurt, but I do not believe for one nanosecond that he told Thunder that these tracks were legal for use in a U.S. based show- period.

Also, although they WANT you to do it, none of the mfrs. will tell you that they can legally authorize copying their product to your PC for show use. They WILL say that THEY won't bug you if you do things their way, but that's it.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 267 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech