Quote:
dammit I need a witch on a broom emoticon anyone able to help?
Of course this site isn't coded for the :witch prompt to turn into this emoticom. LOL
| Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums https://mail.karaokescene.net/forums/ |
|
| For MorganLeFey https://mail.karaokescene.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=7666 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Steven Kaplan [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | For MorganLeFey |
Quote: dammit I need a witch on a broom emoticon anyone able to help?
Of course this site isn't coded for the :witch prompt to turn into this emoticom. LOL |
|
| Author: | Guest [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
There is another nice one here: http://www.netaxs.com/~mhmyers/witchL.mov.gif |
|
| Author: | Steven Kaplan [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
Now that is a great one ! I wonder if it's within limits of an emoticom option ! |
|
| Author: | MorganLeFey [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
[schild=1 fontcolor=FF7F50 shadowcolor=238E68 shieldshadow=1]Kappy will you marry me[/schild] this is luvly, but ummm any chance of a gorgeous buxomly curvacious redheaded witch on a broom? You know, the sort you would be frightened to take home to mother |
|
| Author: | MorganLeFey [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
oohh just looked at the flying one...how do I turn that into an emotcion? |
|
| Author: | Steven Kaplan [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
Quote: this is luvly, but ummm any chance of a gorgeous buxomly curvacious redheaded witch on a broom?
You know, the sort you would be frightened to take home to mother That's the type I'd also be frightened to post in here LMAO |
|
| Author: | MorganLeFey [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
Kappy I dont believe you would be frightened of anything anywhere |
|
| Author: | Guest [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
I bet a plate of gefilte fish would send shivers up his spine--trust me on this... |
|
| Author: | MorganLeFey [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
had something like this in mind but in red |
|
| Author: | MorganLeFey [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
actually I could do away wiv the broom |
|
| Author: | MorganLeFey [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
michaeljayklein @ Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:51 pm wrote: I bet a plate of gefilte fish would send shivers up his spine--trust me on this...
the mere sound of it would terrify anyone especially if you were threatened with it as a child |
|
| Author: | Guest [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
If you go to this site, smiley.com, they have a nice assortment of "witch" emoticons: http://smiley.smileycentral.com/downloa ... +emoticons |
|
| Author: | MorganLeFey [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
michaeljayklein @ Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:55 pm wrote: If you go to this site, smiley.com, they have a nice assortment of "witch" emoticons:
http://smiley.smileycentral.com/downloa ... +emoticons I am there now |
|
| Author: | Steven Kaplan [ Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
Quote: Kappy I dont believe you would be frightened of anything anywhere Well, *I* wouldn't be frightened of anything except no longer being able to sign onto KS assuming I posted Quote: "a gorgeous buxomly curvacious redheaded witch on a broom?
You know, the sort you would be frightened to take home to mother" |
|
| Author: | Steven Kaplan [ Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
SNOPES Claim: A duck's quack doesn't echo, and no one knows why. Status: False. Origins: Anyone who has been on the Internet more than a week has probably received at least one of those annoying lists of "facts": dozens and dozens of items of no real significance that somebody thought would be cool for you to know. It is indeed fortunate that the lists are usually composed of items of no real significance, because many of the entries are of dubious veracity. The purpose of these lists apparently is not to educate the masses (however trivially), but to induce readers into the information age equivalent of a scavenger hunt, sending them scurrying all over the Internet in an attempt to verify the truthfulness of the entries. Ours is one of the virtual doors that gets knocked on quite frequently by these scavengers, and while we're glad to help, our job is never done because anyone can make up lists like these — just invent four or five of the most far-fetched statements you can imagine, and follow them with the phrase "and no one knows why." To wit: Ostrich eggs have no yolks, and no one knows why. Julius Caesar was left-handed, and no one knows why. Banging your head against a solid wall really hurts, and no one knows why. The winner (so far) of the Most Ludicrous Entry contest is the claim that a duck's quack doesn't echo. Unfortunately, it's also the item we're most frequently asked about. The premise is just silly: a duck's quack (and presumably, of all the sounds known to man, only a duck's quack) has some special sonic property that causes it not to echo. We're not talking about a situation where a landform creates an acoustic shadow (a phenomenon under which even loud sounds can be inaudible to nearby listeners), but the claim that a duck's quack doesn't echo under any conditions. First of all, how are we to define "a duck's quack"? Different breeds of duck make different sounds, and there are a lot of breeds of duck in the world. And anyone who has spent time around ducks knows that even within the same breed of duck, a male's quack can sound nothing like a female's. (Female mallards, for example, make loud honking sounds, but male mallards produce a much softer, rasping sound.) Do all these varied sounds, without exception, fail to produce an echo? I could dismiss this one merely from personal experience. Although I grew up in suburbia, much of my youth was spent raising various kinds of domesticated animals, particularly ducks and geese. When those ducks got to quacking, I could most assuredly hear the cacophony of sound as it echoed off the stone walls that surrounded our yard and entered my bedroom window. So could the neighbors a few hundred feet down the street, who frequently called us to complain about the noise. The surprise was not that our ducks' quacks didn't echo, but that they echoed so remarkably well. Fortunately, we now have more than my personal experience to offer since an acoustic research experiment was carried out at the University of Salford in Greater Manchester in 2003 to set this legend to rest: Acoustic expert Trevor Cox tested the popular myth — often the subject of television quiz shows and Internet chat rooms — by first recording Daisy's quack in a special chamber with jagged surfaces that produces no sound reflections. She was then moved to a reverberation chamber with cathedral-like acoustics before the data was used to create simulations of Daisy performing at the Royal Albert Hall and quacking as she flew past a cliff face. The tests revealed that a duck's quack definitely echoes, just like any other sound, but perhaps not as noticeably. "A duck quacks rather quietly, so the sound coming back is at a low level and might not be heard," Cox told the UK Press Association. "Also, a quack is a fading sound. It has a gradual decay, so it's hard to tell the difference between the actual quack and the echo. That's especially true if you haven't previously heard what it sounds like with no reflections." He said ducks were normally found in open-water areas and didn't usually congregate around echoey cliffs, which may have fueled the theory that their quacks don't produce an echo. "You get a bit of reverberation — it's distinctly echoey," Cox said Last updated: 9 September 2003 The URL for this page is http://www.snopes.com/critters/wild/duckecho.htm Click here to e-mail this page to a friend Urban Legends Reference Pages © 1995-2003 by Barbara and David P. Mikkelson This material may not be reproduced without permission |
|
| Author: | Steven Kaplan [ Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: For MorganLeFey |
Quote: Banging your head against a solid wall really hurts, and no one knows why.
This is another urban legend. I couldn't feel a thing |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
