Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums
https://mail.karaokescene.net/forums/

sm58
https://mail.karaokescene.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=10639
Page 1 of 3

Author:  karyoker [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 12:03 pm ]
Post subject:  sm58

The mic..what does she use

I saw her on the today show fri Her new song guess what she was using ?

Author:  Steven Kaplan [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 12:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

Makes you kind've wonder how much MORE microphone a person really benefits by I suppose.

Author:  Babs [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 12:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

Hmmmm - I'll have what she's having  :D

Author:  Jim_n_TN [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

I think a lot of other well known artists use the SM58.

Last year when I bought my 2 SM58s the salesman told me he had a special price on another brand of mic that was just as good as the SM58. I don't remember the name of the other mic but I ask him to plug in both and let me sing on them. After singing a bit on each without me saying a word the salesman said he wasn't going tell anyone else that the other mic was as good as an SM58.  

Besides great sound I had heard that they were rugged.  I had no desire to test the rugged part but less than 6 months after I bought them one was dropped 5 ft onto a bare concrete floor.  I had to take the wire ball off and straigten it out but it was otherwise undamaged.

Jim

Author:  Dr Fred [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

I know a few people who were Pro musicians and a bunch of bands that get regular gigs.

They all swear by the SM58 and SM57 for some applications. It is the standard for pretty much any wired mic in the public performance setting.

For studio work many of them use different mics, but that is when they dont have to worry about any background sound.

According to reputation the sound control from the SM58 allows people to sing into the mic without amplifying background noise coming from other directions, and that technology is what allows most public performance.

According to rep also, they can take major abuse and keep going.

I bought 3 on saturday and they feel VERY solid (and heavy) compared to many of the lightweight cheaper mics I usually see in Karaoke.

Author:  mckyj57 [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 3:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

I love my SM-58. Everybody tells me other ones are better, and I have bought a Sennheiser, Audix, and the Shure Beta 58A. I still keep going back to my SM58.

Author:  MorganLeFey [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 4:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

yep the sm58 is a very forgiving mic I am proof positive you dont have to be a great singer to sound good with an sm58...I do have to be having a good night to sound as smooth with my seinnheiser because its so freakin clear there is no margin for error. the sm58 hides a multitude of sins

Author:  karyoker [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 4:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

I did notice one thing with Martina and I never gave it much thought but I think I figured it out When she is not singing she holds the mic away. I think she is inhaling a bunch of air which could be heard on the mic. I love watching the pros on tv Ray charles used to bob his head it wasnt keeping time it was working the mic.

Author:  Lonman [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

Had the same 3 SM58's in operation since 94.  They've been dropped, slung, flung, kicked & one even dropped in a pitcher of beer - except for replacing the mic screens on them once or twice a year, they all work & sounds as good as day 1!  Actually in all honesty I did have to finally replace 1, not from quitting working, the fitting where the mic plug latches in the barrel wore out & don't hold the cord in anymore.  The new one took it's place & the old will move into service where it will be stationary.

Author:  karyoker [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

Quote:
ep the sm58 is a very forgiving mic I am proof positive you dont have to be a great singer to sound good with an sm58...I do have to be having a good night to sound as smooth with my seinnheiser because its so freakin clear there is no margin for error. the sm58 hides a multitude of sins


The seinhieser is for recording and can be tailored by post FX either analogue or digital  It takes a real sound man during live performances to tailor.. Whereas the sm58 can be be tailored by the performer and is the best live mic ever.

Author:  karaoke for food..... [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

I have both the Sm58, and Beta58, i like them both. Both are great, both are a little different. I noticed the Beta58 is a little hotter then the 58, but doesn't have the curve the sm58 has. How do some of you compare them?

Author:  Lonman [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

karaoke for food..... @ Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:46 pm wrote:
I have both the Sm58, and Beta58, i like them both. Both are great, both are a little different. I noticed the Beta58 is a little hotter then the 58, but doesn't have the curve the sm58 has. How do some of you compare them?


The Beta is also a tighter pickup pattern so you have to be more mic saavy & sing straight into it as well - better feedback rejection, but for a general karaoke mic I think the SM58 is a better choice for those who like to sing from their cheek or their chin or aiming at their nostrils - you all know the type  LMAO

Author:  jdmeister [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

I have two, looking at a third.. :hi5:

Author:  karaoke for food..... [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

I found the Beta to be a "Hotter" more sensitive mic. I couldn't justify the extra cost, just wondered if you guys felt the same was all. Guess ya'all due.... :worship:

Author:  Steven Kaplan [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

i've mic'd instruments with the Beta Greens, and the SM-57's and 58's, 48's and Uni 565's.  I can't hear a difference. Even in a head-to-head but I don't have the ability to EQ like pros do either.

Author:  karaoke for food..... [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

I've mic'ed a lot of accoustic, and dobro with the 57, a great little bright mic. I am currently using a couple of AKG c451's. They are just incredible for the bucks as well.

Author:  MorganLeFey [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

karyoker @ Tue Aug 28, 2007 1:40 pm wrote:
Quote:
ep the sm58 is a very forgiving mic I am proof positive you dont have to be a great singer to sound good with an sm58...I do have to be having a good night to sound as smooth with my seinnheiser because its so freakin clear there is no margin for error. the sm58 hides a multitude of sins


The seinhieser is for recording and can be tailored by post FX either analogue or digital  It takes a real sound man during live performances to tailor.. Whereas the sm58 can be be tailored by the performer and is the best live mic ever.



wish I had the luxury of a sound man lol nope I just tweak as I need to as the night progresses

Author:  mrdelicious2 [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 5:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

When I was just getting into the business a few years back....one of the first things I did was start paying attention to what mics you see at other places, what mics you see on tv with professional, bands, singers......I also talked to many many people about mics.  The choice was very clear, Shure SM58!  Industry standard for years.  There is a reason for this.  I've got (2) wired and also a wireless with SM58 guts.  Sure there are better mics out there, but price compared.......I'm sticking with my SM58's.  I've tried a few of the beta models recently, they also perform very well with unique differences, some are hotter, some are clearer, etc.  MrD

Author:  karyoker [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 5:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

One I like  is the axs 1 It has a shorter grille I lost the grille at an outside boat club gig and never could find one. I had to take one off of a beta...

Author:  pflugerville [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 6:18 am ]
Post subject:  Re: sm58

Lonman @ Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:56 pm wrote:
The Beta is also a tighter pickup pattern so you have to be more mic saavy & sing straight into it as well - better feedback rejection, but for a general karaoke mic I think the SM58 is a better choice for those who like to sing from their cheek or their chin or aiming at their nostrils - you all know the type  LMAO


jdmeister @ Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:00 pm wrote:
I have two, looking at a third.. :hi5:


a third nostril......hmmmmm.  i may have to look into that.  could help my Willie Nelson impersonation.

Page 1 of 3 All times are UTC - 8 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/