Lonman is right this is a few months old, however as of August 9, 2007 the second conviction has occured. Tray Brocks partner, Sonny Freeman was convicted of 3 felony counts.
1.Conspiricy to Commit Copyright Infringement
2.Criminal Copyright Infringement
3.Trafficking in Circumvention Technology in violation of the DMCA He has the same possible jail term 5 years and the same fines as Tracy Brock. However he also has given up, in order to obtain this plea agreement.
1. one car
2. one trailer
3. two jet skis
4. two Sea Ray boats
5. his home in Florida
6. two bank accounts
7. one brokerage account
These things were confiscated and are worth just under 2 million dollars.
What's truly the most interesting count is count 3 and the fact that using software that was designed to manage, organize and run a karaoke show.
FYI, I was also told recently that Panorama just lost it's appeal in the sixth circuit court for it's music being protected by the fair use act.

Boy she was asking for it - Dah put a website out selling illegal downloads. What was she thinking

She was a high volume seller on Ebay (profiting off've this pirated stuff for over two years). She was quite visible.  In this case it's easy for prosecution to show monetary damage.

This is actually a Civil and Criminal case.  What makes this a Felony that's being brought to Federal Court IS substantiated based on *dollar amount*.  These cases are ALWAYS about money damages. Otherwise great expense is doled out by the Plaintiff to only find that a court will dismiss it as a de minimus case.  What makes everybody certain that "monetary damage" will have no importance in the restitution phase ?  That usually settled via monetary relief.  Your hearing what :could: be, but remedies for infringement based upon damages and profit have been totally ruled out where ? They haven't been yet.  

There are options, alternative resolutions, and plea-bargaining tactics. The section on Copyright infringement and remedies (if you view 504 a,b,c & d) gives many options, and where it states "generally" regarding "Damages and Profits" vs "Statutory Penalty" (section 504 part 2) of the crime (meaning possible 5 years jail time, 3 years home release, costly fine) none of that precludes monetary relief settlements and alternate dispute possibilities. Yes, she's guilty we know that, but monetary damage, and her amount of profit DOES factor in, and is viewed heavily by the federal court.  These cases are still tried in accordance with all aspects of substantive law. Tangible figures are always factored in. It's always about "amount".
These aren't simplistic cases.  This might not go to trial for many years.


http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html#504

Copyright law is federal law. It's substantive law principles.