DannyG2006 @ Wed Aug 15, 2007 2:43 pm wrote:
If you were to read on other forums: Pacemaker sucks. Everyone wants a new one to come out.
The only software based keychanger worth its salt is built into Hoster.
I don't have to read on other forums. I use both Hoster and Pacemaker, and the only thing I don't like about Pacemaker in comparison is the lag time. Otherwise, it works great and sounds good. In some ways better than Hoster's, which has some ringing artifacts from time to time. I do have ears, and I know how to operate a computer. I can make my own evaluation there, and Pacemaker is fine.
Quote:
Any Hardware based keychanger, including the lousy ones built into the cdg players, is better than Pacemaker. You don't have to wait several notes for the change that you do have to wait for Pacemaker to make it's change.
If that is your only criterion, Pacemaker sucks. To me it is a minor problem, since I can adjust the key while the song is on pause and have no problem. It *sounds* good, which the hardware-based keychangers I have seen often do not. The VocoPro keychanger on the KJ-3000 sounds terrible, artifacts galore -- and the bigger the change, the worse it is.
For me, the sound is king. And if you are often changing key in the middle of the song, something is wrong with the way the show is running, in my opinion.
Quote:
What is this no eq to speak of bit? I can eq anything with a high low and mid adjustment buttons which is present on both models for not only the music but the vocals as well.
Well, I differ on that. I think that you need to be able to do better than that for a lot of rooms. If you want intelligible and "present" vocals, you need to be able to tune the midrange, and you can't do that with bass/treble and channel EQ. If it had a sweepable mid, maybe. But that still would make it difficult to accomplish. And I am sure those units don't have sweepable mids.